Cargando…

Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array

PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jäger, Andreas, Wegener, Sonja, Sauer, Otto A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409
_version_ 1784581351452704768
author Jäger, Andreas
Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
author_facet Jäger, Andreas
Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
author_sort Jäger, Andreas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a linear accelerator were applied to the detector array while decreasing the average dose rate, that is, the pulse frequency, from 500 to 30 MU/min. An ion chamber was placed inside the ArcCHECK cavity as a reference. Furthermore, the instantaneous dose rate dependence (DRD) was studied. The position of the detector was adjusted to change the dose‐per‐pulse, varying the distance between the focus and the diode closest to the focus between 69.6 and 359.6 cm. Reference measurements were performed with an ion chamber placed inside a PMMA slab phantom at the same source‐to‐detector distances ([Formula: see text]. Exponential saturation functions were fitted to the data, with different parameters to account for two generations of ArcCHECK detectors (types 2 and 3) and both DRDs. Corrections were applied to 12 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. RESULTS: The sensitivity decreased by up to 2.8% with a decrease in average dose rate and by 9% with a decrease in instantaneous dose rate. Correcting the average DRD, the mean gamma pass rates (2%/2‐mm criterion) of the treatment plans were improved by 5 percentage points (PP) for diode type 3 and 0.4 PP for type 2. Correcting the instantaneous DRD, the improvement was 8.4 PP for type 3 and 0.9 PP for type 2. CONCLUSIONS: The instantaneous DRD was identified as the prevailing effect on the diode sensitivity. We developed and validated a method to correct this behavior. The number of falsely not passed treatment plans could be considerably reduced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85045982021-10-18 Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array Jäger, Andreas Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a linear accelerator were applied to the detector array while decreasing the average dose rate, that is, the pulse frequency, from 500 to 30 MU/min. An ion chamber was placed inside the ArcCHECK cavity as a reference. Furthermore, the instantaneous dose rate dependence (DRD) was studied. The position of the detector was adjusted to change the dose‐per‐pulse, varying the distance between the focus and the diode closest to the focus between 69.6 and 359.6 cm. Reference measurements were performed with an ion chamber placed inside a PMMA slab phantom at the same source‐to‐detector distances ([Formula: see text]. Exponential saturation functions were fitted to the data, with different parameters to account for two generations of ArcCHECK detectors (types 2 and 3) and both DRDs. Corrections were applied to 12 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. RESULTS: The sensitivity decreased by up to 2.8% with a decrease in average dose rate and by 9% with a decrease in instantaneous dose rate. Correcting the average DRD, the mean gamma pass rates (2%/2‐mm criterion) of the treatment plans were improved by 5 percentage points (PP) for diode type 3 and 0.4 PP for type 2. Correcting the instantaneous DRD, the improvement was 8.4 PP for type 3 and 0.9 PP for type 2. CONCLUSIONS: The instantaneous DRD was identified as the prevailing effect on the diode sensitivity. We developed and validated a method to correct this behavior. The number of falsely not passed treatment plans could be considerably reduced. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8504598/ /pubmed/34519437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jäger, Andreas
Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title_full Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title_fullStr Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title_full_unstemmed Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title_short Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
title_sort dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409
work_keys_str_mv AT jagerandreas doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray
AT wegenersonja doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray
AT sauerottoa doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray