Cargando…
Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array
PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409 |
_version_ | 1784581351452704768 |
---|---|
author | Jäger, Andreas Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. |
author_facet | Jäger, Andreas Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. |
author_sort | Jäger, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a linear accelerator were applied to the detector array while decreasing the average dose rate, that is, the pulse frequency, from 500 to 30 MU/min. An ion chamber was placed inside the ArcCHECK cavity as a reference. Furthermore, the instantaneous dose rate dependence (DRD) was studied. The position of the detector was adjusted to change the dose‐per‐pulse, varying the distance between the focus and the diode closest to the focus between 69.6 and 359.6 cm. Reference measurements were performed with an ion chamber placed inside a PMMA slab phantom at the same source‐to‐detector distances ([Formula: see text]. Exponential saturation functions were fitted to the data, with different parameters to account for two generations of ArcCHECK detectors (types 2 and 3) and both DRDs. Corrections were applied to 12 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. RESULTS: The sensitivity decreased by up to 2.8% with a decrease in average dose rate and by 9% with a decrease in instantaneous dose rate. Correcting the average DRD, the mean gamma pass rates (2%/2‐mm criterion) of the treatment plans were improved by 5 percentage points (PP) for diode type 3 and 0.4 PP for type 2. Correcting the instantaneous DRD, the improvement was 8.4 PP for type 3 and 0.9 PP for type 2. CONCLUSIONS: The instantaneous DRD was identified as the prevailing effect on the diode sensitivity. We developed and validated a method to correct this behavior. The number of falsely not passed treatment plans could be considerably reduced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8504598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85045982021-10-18 Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array Jäger, Andreas Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: A signal dependence on dose rate was reported for the ArcCHECK array due to recombination processes within the diodes. The purpose of our work was to quantify the necessary correction and apply them to quality assurance measurements. METHODS: Static 10 × 10 cm(2) 6‐MV fields delivered by a linear accelerator were applied to the detector array while decreasing the average dose rate, that is, the pulse frequency, from 500 to 30 MU/min. An ion chamber was placed inside the ArcCHECK cavity as a reference. Furthermore, the instantaneous dose rate dependence (DRD) was studied. The position of the detector was adjusted to change the dose‐per‐pulse, varying the distance between the focus and the diode closest to the focus between 69.6 and 359.6 cm. Reference measurements were performed with an ion chamber placed inside a PMMA slab phantom at the same source‐to‐detector distances ([Formula: see text]. Exponential saturation functions were fitted to the data, with different parameters to account for two generations of ArcCHECK detectors (types 2 and 3) and both DRDs. Corrections were applied to 12 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. RESULTS: The sensitivity decreased by up to 2.8% with a decrease in average dose rate and by 9% with a decrease in instantaneous dose rate. Correcting the average DRD, the mean gamma pass rates (2%/2‐mm criterion) of the treatment plans were improved by 5 percentage points (PP) for diode type 3 and 0.4 PP for type 2. Correcting the instantaneous DRD, the improvement was 8.4 PP for type 3 and 0.9 PP for type 2. CONCLUSIONS: The instantaneous DRD was identified as the prevailing effect on the diode sensitivity. We developed and validated a method to correct this behavior. The number of falsely not passed treatment plans could be considerably reduced. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8504598/ /pubmed/34519437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Jäger, Andreas Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title | Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title_full | Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title_fullStr | Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title_short | Dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
title_sort | dose rate correction for a silicon diode detector array |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jagerandreas doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray AT wegenersonja doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray AT sauerottoa doseratecorrectionforasilicondiodedetectorarray |