Cargando…
A novel angular dependency model for MatriXX response and its application to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans
PURPOSE: This paper proposes a model for the angular dependency of MatriXX response and investigates whether MatriXX, with the angular‐model‐based approach can be applied to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans. METHOD: This model attributes the angular dependence of MatriXX response to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13405 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: This paper proposes a model for the angular dependency of MatriXX response and investigates whether MatriXX, with the angular‐model‐based approach can be applied to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans. METHOD: This model attributes the angular dependence of MatriXX response to dynamical translation of its effective measurement plane (EMP) due to the change of beam angle. Considering this mechanism, true composite dose verifications for IMRT plans specified in AAPM TG 119 report using both MatriXX and Gafchromic EBT3 films were undertook and compared to validate the applicability of MatriXX for patient specific QA of composite beam IMRT plans. Dose verifications using MatriXX with and without angular‐model‐based approach were performed. RESULTS: MatriXX with angular‐model‐based approach achieved gamma passing rates with 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm criteria better than 98.3% and 98.1% respectively for true composite dose verification of plans in AAPM TG 119 report. The 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma passing rates using MatriXX without angular‐model‐based approach ranged from 85.8% to 98.2% and from 81.3% to 96.5%, respectively. The p‐values from the single sided paired t‐test indicated no statistical difference between the passing rates from MatriXX with angular‐model‐based approach and from films, and significant difference between the passing rates from uncorrected MatriXX and from films. CONCLUSION: The proposed model for angular dependent MatriXX response is necessary and effective. Dose verification using MatriXX with angular‐model‐based approach is acceptable for true composite beam IMRT plans with required accuracy to simplify patient specific QA. |
---|