Cargando…

Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate how the choice of the region of interest (ROI) affects the registration results of surface imaging for daily positioning of breast cancer patients. METHODS: The AlignRT system (VisionRT, London) and the XVI Cone beam CT (CBCT; Elekta, Stockholm) ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauer, Tim‐Oliver, Ott, Oliver J., Lahmer, Godehard, Fietkau, Rainer, Bert, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13410
_version_ 1784581355207655424
author Sauer, Tim‐Oliver
Ott, Oliver J.
Lahmer, Godehard
Fietkau, Rainer
Bert, Christoph
author_facet Sauer, Tim‐Oliver
Ott, Oliver J.
Lahmer, Godehard
Fietkau, Rainer
Bert, Christoph
author_sort Sauer, Tim‐Oliver
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate how the choice of the region of interest (ROI) affects the registration results of surface imaging for daily positioning of breast cancer patients. METHODS: The AlignRT system (VisionRT, London) and the XVI Cone beam CT (CBCT; Elekta, Stockholm) installed on two Versa HD linacs (Elekta) were used in this study, which included 28 patients (160 fractions). In the clinical workflow, patients were prepositioned with AlignRT and then shifted in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) according to the CBCT. A new reference capture was taken immediately afterward. Retrospectively, the surface capture resulting from prepositioning was registered to the latest reference capture. By varying the ROI used for registration, the surface‐based results were optimized in terms of minimizing the deviation to the clinically applied CBCT shifts. Two sets of ROIs were used: one obtained by applying a variable margin to the breast surface, another by combining ROIs of anatomical structures, including the sternum and contralateral breast. RESULTS: Registration results showed significant differences from one ROI to another. Generally, the results improved with increasing ROI size, especially for rotational DOFs. ROIs, including the axilla or supraclavicular lymph drainage region, did not yield an improved registration result. On the other hand, an ROI comprising the breast surface, sternum, and a belt caudal to the breasts decreased the average magnitude of the translational and rotational deviations by 6.6% and 30.8% (p < 0.01), respectively, compared to the breast surface only results. CONCLUSION: The influence of the ROI choice on surface imaging registration results was analyzed and the surface‐based shifts were compared to clinically applied CBCT shifts. An optimal ROI for the treatment of breast cancer patients, consisting of the breast surface, sternum, and a belt, was identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8504613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85046132021-10-18 Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer Sauer, Tim‐Oliver Ott, Oliver J. Lahmer, Godehard Fietkau, Rainer Bert, Christoph J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate how the choice of the region of interest (ROI) affects the registration results of surface imaging for daily positioning of breast cancer patients. METHODS: The AlignRT system (VisionRT, London) and the XVI Cone beam CT (CBCT; Elekta, Stockholm) installed on two Versa HD linacs (Elekta) were used in this study, which included 28 patients (160 fractions). In the clinical workflow, patients were prepositioned with AlignRT and then shifted in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) according to the CBCT. A new reference capture was taken immediately afterward. Retrospectively, the surface capture resulting from prepositioning was registered to the latest reference capture. By varying the ROI used for registration, the surface‐based results were optimized in terms of minimizing the deviation to the clinically applied CBCT shifts. Two sets of ROIs were used: one obtained by applying a variable margin to the breast surface, another by combining ROIs of anatomical structures, including the sternum and contralateral breast. RESULTS: Registration results showed significant differences from one ROI to another. Generally, the results improved with increasing ROI size, especially for rotational DOFs. ROIs, including the axilla or supraclavicular lymph drainage region, did not yield an improved registration result. On the other hand, an ROI comprising the breast surface, sternum, and a belt caudal to the breasts decreased the average magnitude of the translational and rotational deviations by 6.6% and 30.8% (p < 0.01), respectively, compared to the breast surface only results. CONCLUSION: The influence of the ROI choice on surface imaging registration results was analyzed and the surface‐based shifts were compared to clinically applied CBCT shifts. An optimal ROI for the treatment of breast cancer patients, consisting of the breast surface, sternum, and a belt, was identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8504613/ /pubmed/34543500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13410 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Sauer, Tim‐Oliver
Ott, Oliver J.
Lahmer, Godehard
Fietkau, Rainer
Bert, Christoph
Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title_full Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title_fullStr Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title_short Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
title_sort region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34543500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13410
work_keys_str_mv AT sauertimoliver regionofinterestoptimizationforradiationtherapyofbreastcancer
AT ottoliverj regionofinterestoptimizationforradiationtherapyofbreastcancer
AT lahmergodehard regionofinterestoptimizationforradiationtherapyofbreastcancer
AT fietkaurainer regionofinterestoptimizationforradiationtherapyofbreastcancer
AT bertchristoph regionofinterestoptimizationforradiationtherapyofbreastcancer