Cargando…

Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Rucha M., Schmidt, Jason, John, Elizabeth, Rastegari, Sheila, Acharya, Priyanka, Kedia, Prashant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212
_version_ 1784581472364003328
author Shah, Rucha M.
Schmidt, Jason
John, Elizabeth
Rastegari, Sheila
Acharya, Priyanka
Kedia, Prashant
author_facet Shah, Rucha M.
Schmidt, Jason
John, Elizabeth
Rastegari, Sheila
Acharya, Priyanka
Kedia, Prashant
author_sort Shah, Rucha M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized. RESULTS: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8505171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85051712021-10-19 Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles Shah, Rucha M. Schmidt, Jason John, Elizabeth Rastegari, Sheila Acharya, Priyanka Kedia, Prashant Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized. RESULTS: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-09 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8505171/ /pubmed/33189102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shah, Rucha M.
Schmidt, Jason
John, Elizabeth
Rastegari, Sheila
Acharya, Priyanka
Kedia, Prashant
Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title_full Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title_fullStr Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title_full_unstemmed Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title_short Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
title_sort superior specimen and diagnostic accuracy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies using 19-gauge versus 22-gauge core needles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212
work_keys_str_mv AT shahrucham superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles
AT schmidtjason superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles
AT johnelizabeth superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles
AT rastegarisheila superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles
AT acharyapriyanka superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles
AT kediaprashant superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles