Cargando…
Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212 |
_version_ | 1784581472364003328 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Rucha M. Schmidt, Jason John, Elizabeth Rastegari, Sheila Acharya, Priyanka Kedia, Prashant |
author_facet | Shah, Rucha M. Schmidt, Jason John, Elizabeth Rastegari, Sheila Acharya, Priyanka Kedia, Prashant |
author_sort | Shah, Rucha M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized. RESULTS: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8505171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85051712021-10-19 Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles Shah, Rucha M. Schmidt, Jason John, Elizabeth Rastegari, Sheila Acharya, Priyanka Kedia, Prashant Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized. RESULTS: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-09 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8505171/ /pubmed/33189102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shah, Rucha M. Schmidt, Jason John, Elizabeth Rastegari, Sheila Acharya, Priyanka Kedia, Prashant Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title | Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title_full | Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title_fullStr | Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title_full_unstemmed | Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title_short | Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles |
title_sort | superior specimen and diagnostic accuracy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies using 19-gauge versus 22-gauge core needles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahrucham superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles AT schmidtjason superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles AT johnelizabeth superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles AT rastegarisheila superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles AT acharyapriyanka superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles AT kediaprashant superiorspecimenanddiagnosticaccuracywithendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsiesusing19gaugeversus22gaugecoreneedles |