Cargando…
PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study
We studied the predictive value of the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio for classifying COVID-19-positive patients who will develop severe clinical outcomes. One hundred fifty patients were recruited and categorized into two distinct populations (“A” and “B”), according to the indications given by the World Heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02840-7 |
_version_ | 1784581539297755136 |
---|---|
author | Sinatti, Gaia Santini, Silvano Junior Tarantino, Giovanni Picchi, Giovanna Cosimini, Benedetta Ranfone, Francesca Casano, Nicolò Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella Iapadre, Nerio Bianconi, Simone Armiento, Antonietta Carducci, Paolo Ciardi, Maria Rosa Mastroianni, Claudio Maria Grimaldi, Alessandro Balsano, Clara |
author_facet | Sinatti, Gaia Santini, Silvano Junior Tarantino, Giovanni Picchi, Giovanna Cosimini, Benedetta Ranfone, Francesca Casano, Nicolò Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella Iapadre, Nerio Bianconi, Simone Armiento, Antonietta Carducci, Paolo Ciardi, Maria Rosa Mastroianni, Claudio Maria Grimaldi, Alessandro Balsano, Clara |
author_sort | Sinatti, Gaia |
collection | PubMed |
description | We studied the predictive value of the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio for classifying COVID-19-positive patients who will develop severe clinical outcomes. One hundred fifty patients were recruited and categorized into two distinct populations (“A” and “B”), according to the indications given by the World Health Organization. Patients belonging the population “A” presented with mild disease not requiring oxygen support, whereas population “B” presented with a severe disease needing oxygen support. The AUC curve of PaO(2)/FiO(2) in the discovery cohort was 0.838 (95% CI 0.771–0.908). The optimal cut-off value for distinguishing population “A” from the “B” one, calculated by Youden’s index, with sensitivity of 71.79% and specificity 85.25%, LR+4.866, LR−0.339, was < 274 mmHg. The AUC in the validation cohort of 170 patients overlapped the previous one, i.e., 0.826 (95% CI 0.760–0.891). PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio < 274 mmHg was a good predictive index test to forecast the development of a severe respiratory failure in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Moreover, our work highlights that PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, compared to inflammatory scores (hs-CRP, NLR, PLR and LDH) indicated to be useful in clinical managements, results to be the most reliable parameter to identify patients who require closer respiratory monitoring and more aggressive supportive therapies. Clinical trial registration: Prognostic Score in COVID-19, prot. NCT04780373 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04780373 (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-021-02840-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8505469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85054692021-10-12 PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study Sinatti, Gaia Santini, Silvano Junior Tarantino, Giovanni Picchi, Giovanna Cosimini, Benedetta Ranfone, Francesca Casano, Nicolò Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella Iapadre, Nerio Bianconi, Simone Armiento, Antonietta Carducci, Paolo Ciardi, Maria Rosa Mastroianni, Claudio Maria Grimaldi, Alessandro Balsano, Clara Intern Emerg Med Im - Original We studied the predictive value of the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio for classifying COVID-19-positive patients who will develop severe clinical outcomes. One hundred fifty patients were recruited and categorized into two distinct populations (“A” and “B”), according to the indications given by the World Health Organization. Patients belonging the population “A” presented with mild disease not requiring oxygen support, whereas population “B” presented with a severe disease needing oxygen support. The AUC curve of PaO(2)/FiO(2) in the discovery cohort was 0.838 (95% CI 0.771–0.908). The optimal cut-off value for distinguishing population “A” from the “B” one, calculated by Youden’s index, with sensitivity of 71.79% and specificity 85.25%, LR+4.866, LR−0.339, was < 274 mmHg. The AUC in the validation cohort of 170 patients overlapped the previous one, i.e., 0.826 (95% CI 0.760–0.891). PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio < 274 mmHg was a good predictive index test to forecast the development of a severe respiratory failure in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Moreover, our work highlights that PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, compared to inflammatory scores (hs-CRP, NLR, PLR and LDH) indicated to be useful in clinical managements, results to be the most reliable parameter to identify patients who require closer respiratory monitoring and more aggressive supportive therapies. Clinical trial registration: Prognostic Score in COVID-19, prot. NCT04780373 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04780373 (retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-021-02840-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8505469/ /pubmed/34637082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02840-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Im - Original Sinatti, Gaia Santini, Silvano Junior Tarantino, Giovanni Picchi, Giovanna Cosimini, Benedetta Ranfone, Francesca Casano, Nicolò Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella Iapadre, Nerio Bianconi, Simone Armiento, Antonietta Carducci, Paolo Ciardi, Maria Rosa Mastroianni, Claudio Maria Grimaldi, Alessandro Balsano, Clara PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title | PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title_full | PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title_fullStr | PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title_full_unstemmed | PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title_short | PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio forecasts COVID-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
title_sort | pao(2)/fio(2) ratio forecasts covid-19 patients’ outcome regardless of age: a cross-sectional, monocentric study |
topic | Im - Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02840-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinattigaia pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT santinisilvanojunior pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT tarantinogiovanni pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT picchigiovanna pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT cosiminibenedetta pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT ranfonefrancesca pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT casanonicolo pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT zingaropolimariaantonella pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT iapadrenerio pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT bianconisimone pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT armientoantonietta pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT carduccipaolo pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT ciardimariarosa pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT mastroianniclaudiomaria pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT grimaldialessandro pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy AT balsanoclara pao2fio2ratioforecastscovid19patientsoutcomeregardlessofageacrosssectionalmonocentricstudy |