Cargando…
Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19
Access to online information has been crucial throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed more than eight million randomly selected Twitter posts from the first wave of the pandemic to study the role of the author’s social status (Health Expert or Influencer) and the informational novelty of the t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99060-y |
_version_ | 1784581550077116416 |
---|---|
author | Photiou, Antonis Nicolaides, Christos Dhillon, Paramveer S. |
author_facet | Photiou, Antonis Nicolaides, Christos Dhillon, Paramveer S. |
author_sort | Photiou, Antonis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Access to online information has been crucial throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed more than eight million randomly selected Twitter posts from the first wave of the pandemic to study the role of the author’s social status (Health Expert or Influencer) and the informational novelty of the tweet in the diffusion of several key types of information. Our results show that health-related information and political discourse propagated faster than personal narratives, economy-related or travel-related news. Content novelty further accelerated the spread of these discussion themes. People trusted health experts on health-related knowledge, especially when it was novel, while influencers were more effective at propagating political discourse. Finally, we observed a U-shaped relationship between the informational novelty and the number of retweets. Tweets with average novelty spread the least. Tweets with high novelty propagated the most, primarily when they discussed political, health, or personal information, perhaps owing to the immediacy to mobilize this information. On the other hand, economic and travel-related information spread most when it was less novel, and people resisted sharing such information before it was duly verified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8505518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85055182021-10-13 Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 Photiou, Antonis Nicolaides, Christos Dhillon, Paramveer S. Sci Rep Article Access to online information has been crucial throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed more than eight million randomly selected Twitter posts from the first wave of the pandemic to study the role of the author’s social status (Health Expert or Influencer) and the informational novelty of the tweet in the diffusion of several key types of information. Our results show that health-related information and political discourse propagated faster than personal narratives, economy-related or travel-related news. Content novelty further accelerated the spread of these discussion themes. People trusted health experts on health-related knowledge, especially when it was novel, while influencers were more effective at propagating political discourse. Finally, we observed a U-shaped relationship between the informational novelty and the number of retweets. Tweets with average novelty spread the least. Tweets with high novelty propagated the most, primarily when they discussed political, health, or personal information, perhaps owing to the immediacy to mobilize this information. On the other hand, economic and travel-related information spread most when it was less novel, and people resisted sharing such information before it was duly verified. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8505518/ /pubmed/34635687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99060-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Photiou, Antonis Nicolaides, Christos Dhillon, Paramveer S. Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title | Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title_full | Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title_short | Social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of COVID-19 |
title_sort | social status and novelty drove the spread of online information during the early stages of covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99060-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT photiouantonis socialstatusandnoveltydrovethespreadofonlineinformationduringtheearlystagesofcovid19 AT nicolaideschristos socialstatusandnoveltydrovethespreadofonlineinformationduringtheearlystagesofcovid19 AT dhillonparamveers socialstatusandnoveltydrovethespreadofonlineinformationduringtheearlystagesofcovid19 |