Cargando…

RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings

BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) are essential for safe surgical practice as they impact workflow and patient outcomes. Observational tools to measure operating room (OR) teams’ NTS have been introduced. However, there are none that account for the specific teamwork challenges introduced by ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreyer, Julia, Koch, Amelie, Herlemann, Annika, Becker, Armin, Schlenker, Boris, Catchpole, Ken, Weigl, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33844085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2
_version_ 1784581562969358336
author Schreyer, Julia
Koch, Amelie
Herlemann, Annika
Becker, Armin
Schlenker, Boris
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
author_facet Schreyer, Julia
Koch, Amelie
Herlemann, Annika
Becker, Armin
Schlenker, Boris
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
author_sort Schreyer, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) are essential for safe surgical practice as they impact workflow and patient outcomes. Observational tools to measure operating room (OR) teams’ NTS have been introduced. However, there are none that account for the specific teamwork challenges introduced by robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). We set out to develop and content-validate a tool to assess multidisciplinary NTS in RAS. METHODOLOGY: Stepwise, multi-method procedure. Observations in different surgical departments and a scoping literature review were first used to compile a set of RAS-specific teamwork behaviours. This list was refined and expert validated using a Delphi consensus approach consisting of qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey. Then, RAS-specific behaviours were merged with a well-established assessment tool on OR teamwork (NOTECHS II). Finally, the new tool—RAS-NOTECHS—was applied in standardized observations of real-world procedures to test its reliability (inter-rater agreement via intra-class correlations). RESULTS: Our scoping review revealed 5242 articles, of which 21 were included based on pre-established inclusion criteria. We elicited 16 RAS-specific behaviours from the literature base. These were synthesized with further 18 behavioural markers (obtained from 12 OR-observations) into a list of 26 behavioural markers. This list was reviewed by seven RAS experts and condensed to 15 expert-validated RAS-specific behavioural markers which were then merged into NOTECHS II. For five observations of urologic RAS procedures (duration: 13 h and 41 min), inter-rater agreement for identification of behavioural markers was strong. Agreement of RAS-NOTECHS scores indicated moderate to strong agreement. CONCLUSIONS: RAS-NOTECHS is the first observational tool for multidisciplinary NTS in RAS. In preliminary application, it has been shown to be reliable. Since RAS is rapidly increasing and challenges for effective and safe teamwork remain at the forefront of quality and safety of surgical care, RAS-NOTECHS may contribute to training and improvement efforts in technology-facilitated surgeries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8505574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85055742022-02-23 RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings Schreyer, Julia Koch, Amelie Herlemann, Annika Becker, Armin Schlenker, Boris Catchpole, Ken Weigl, Matthias Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) are essential for safe surgical practice as they impact workflow and patient outcomes. Observational tools to measure operating room (OR) teams’ NTS have been introduced. However, there are none that account for the specific teamwork challenges introduced by robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). We set out to develop and content-validate a tool to assess multidisciplinary NTS in RAS. METHODOLOGY: Stepwise, multi-method procedure. Observations in different surgical departments and a scoping literature review were first used to compile a set of RAS-specific teamwork behaviours. This list was refined and expert validated using a Delphi consensus approach consisting of qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey. Then, RAS-specific behaviours were merged with a well-established assessment tool on OR teamwork (NOTECHS II). Finally, the new tool—RAS-NOTECHS—was applied in standardized observations of real-world procedures to test its reliability (inter-rater agreement via intra-class correlations). RESULTS: Our scoping review revealed 5242 articles, of which 21 were included based on pre-established inclusion criteria. We elicited 16 RAS-specific behaviours from the literature base. These were synthesized with further 18 behavioural markers (obtained from 12 OR-observations) into a list of 26 behavioural markers. This list was reviewed by seven RAS experts and condensed to 15 expert-validated RAS-specific behavioural markers which were then merged into NOTECHS II. For five observations of urologic RAS procedures (duration: 13 h and 41 min), inter-rater agreement for identification of behavioural markers was strong. Agreement of RAS-NOTECHS scores indicated moderate to strong agreement. CONCLUSIONS: RAS-NOTECHS is the first observational tool for multidisciplinary NTS in RAS. In preliminary application, it has been shown to be reliable. Since RAS is rapidly increasing and challenges for effective and safe teamwork remain at the forefront of quality and safety of surgical care, RAS-NOTECHS may contribute to training and improvement efforts in technology-facilitated surgeries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2. Springer US 2021-04-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8505574/ /pubmed/33844085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schreyer, Julia
Koch, Amelie
Herlemann, Annika
Becker, Armin
Schlenker, Boris
Catchpole, Ken
Weigl, Matthias
RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title_full RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title_fullStr RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title_full_unstemmed RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title_short RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
title_sort ras-notechs: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33844085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08474-2
work_keys_str_mv AT schreyerjulia rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT kochamelie rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT herlemannannika rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT beckerarmin rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT schlenkerboris rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT catchpoleken rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings
AT weiglmatthias rasnotechsvalidityandreliabilityofatoolformeasuringnontechnicalskillsinroboticassistedsurgerysettings