Cargando…

Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance

PURPOSE: The current literature on the use of brachial artery access is controversial. Some studies found increased puncture site complications. Others found no higher complication rates than in patients with femoral or radial access. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ultrasou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appelt, K., Takes, M., Zech, C. J., Blackham, KA, Schubert, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34633563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-021-00262-2
_version_ 1784581567175196672
author Appelt, K.
Takes, M.
Zech, C. J.
Blackham, KA
Schubert, T.
author_facet Appelt, K.
Takes, M.
Zech, C. J.
Blackham, KA
Schubert, T.
author_sort Appelt, K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The current literature on the use of brachial artery access is controversial. Some studies found increased puncture site complications. Others found no higher complication rates than in patients with femoral or radial access. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ultrasound (US)-guidance on access site complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of all consecutive patients with brachial arterial access for interventional procedures. Complications were classified into minor complications (conservative treatment only) and major complications (requiring surgical intervention). The brachial artery was cannulated in the antecubital fossa under US-guidance. After the intervention, manual compression or closure devices, both followed by a compression bandage for 3 h, either achieved hemostasis. RESULTS: Seventy-five procedures in seventy-one patients were performed in the study period using brachial access. Access was successful in all cases (100%). Procedures in different vascular territories were performed: neurovascular (10/13.5%), upper extremity (32/43.2%), visceral (20/27.0%), and lower extremity (12/16.3%). Sheath size ranged from 3.2F to 8F (mean: 5F). Closure devices were used in 17 cases (22.7%). In total, six complications were observed (8.0%), four minor complications (5.3%, mostly puncture site hematomas), and two major complications, that needed surgical treatment (2.7%). No brachial artery thrombosis or upper extremity ischemia occurred. CONCLUSION: Exclusive use of US-guidance resulted in a low risk of brachial artery access site complications in our study compared to the literature. US-guidance has been proven to reduce the risk of access site complications in several studies in femoral access. In addition, brachial artery access yields a high technical success rate and requires no additional injection of spasmolytic medication. Sheath size was the single significant predictor for complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8505595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85055952021-10-27 Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance Appelt, K. Takes, M. Zech, C. J. Blackham, KA Schubert, T. CVIR Endovasc Original Article PURPOSE: The current literature on the use of brachial artery access is controversial. Some studies found increased puncture site complications. Others found no higher complication rates than in patients with femoral or radial access. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ultrasound (US)-guidance on access site complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of all consecutive patients with brachial arterial access for interventional procedures. Complications were classified into minor complications (conservative treatment only) and major complications (requiring surgical intervention). The brachial artery was cannulated in the antecubital fossa under US-guidance. After the intervention, manual compression or closure devices, both followed by a compression bandage for 3 h, either achieved hemostasis. RESULTS: Seventy-five procedures in seventy-one patients were performed in the study period using brachial access. Access was successful in all cases (100%). Procedures in different vascular territories were performed: neurovascular (10/13.5%), upper extremity (32/43.2%), visceral (20/27.0%), and lower extremity (12/16.3%). Sheath size ranged from 3.2F to 8F (mean: 5F). Closure devices were used in 17 cases (22.7%). In total, six complications were observed (8.0%), four minor complications (5.3%, mostly puncture site hematomas), and two major complications, that needed surgical treatment (2.7%). No brachial artery thrombosis or upper extremity ischemia occurred. CONCLUSION: Exclusive use of US-guidance resulted in a low risk of brachial artery access site complications in our study compared to the literature. US-guidance has been proven to reduce the risk of access site complications in several studies in femoral access. In addition, brachial artery access yields a high technical success rate and requires no additional injection of spasmolytic medication. Sheath size was the single significant predictor for complications. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8505595/ /pubmed/34633563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-021-00262-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Appelt, K.
Takes, M.
Zech, C. J.
Blackham, KA
Schubert, T.
Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title_full Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title_fullStr Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title_full_unstemmed Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title_short Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
title_sort complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34633563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-021-00262-2
work_keys_str_mv AT appeltk complicationratesofpercutaneousbrachialarterypunctureeffectofliveultrasoundguidance
AT takesm complicationratesofpercutaneousbrachialarterypunctureeffectofliveultrasoundguidance
AT zechcj complicationratesofpercutaneousbrachialarterypunctureeffectofliveultrasoundguidance
AT blackhamka complicationratesofpercutaneousbrachialarterypunctureeffectofliveultrasoundguidance
AT schubertt complicationratesofpercutaneousbrachialarterypunctureeffectofliveultrasoundguidance