Cargando…
Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection
The information captured by the gist signal, which refers to radiologists’ first impression arising from an initial global image processing, is poorly understood. We examined whether the gist signal can provide complementary information to data captured by radiologists (experiment 1), or computer al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99582-5 |
_version_ | 1784581577755328512 |
---|---|
author | Gandomkar, Ziba Siviengphanom, Somphone Ekpo, Ernest U. Suleiman, Mo’ayyad Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli Li, Tong Xu, Dong Evans, Karla K. Lewis, Sarah J. Wolfe, Jeremy M. Brennan, Patrick C. |
author_facet | Gandomkar, Ziba Siviengphanom, Somphone Ekpo, Ernest U. Suleiman, Mo’ayyad Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli Li, Tong Xu, Dong Evans, Karla K. Lewis, Sarah J. Wolfe, Jeremy M. Brennan, Patrick C. |
author_sort | Gandomkar, Ziba |
collection | PubMed |
description | The information captured by the gist signal, which refers to radiologists’ first impression arising from an initial global image processing, is poorly understood. We examined whether the gist signal can provide complementary information to data captured by radiologists (experiment 1), or computer algorithms (experiment 2) based on detailed mammogram inspection. In the first experiment, 19 radiologists assessed a case set twice, once based on a half-second image presentation (i.e., gist signal) and once in the usual viewing condition. Their performances in two viewing conditions were compared using repeated measure correlation (rm-corr). The cancer cases (19 cases × 19 readers) exhibited non-significant trend with rm-corr = 0.012 (p = 0.82, CI: −0.09, 0.12). For normal cases (41 cases × 19 readers), a weak correlation of rm-corr = 0.238 (p < 0.001, CI: 0.17, 0.30) was found. In the second experiment, we combined the abnormality score from a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool (DL) with the radiological gist signal using a support vector machine (SVM). To obtain the gist signal, 53 radiologists assessed images based on half-second image presentation. The SVM performance for each radiologist and an average reader, whose gist responses were the mean abnormality scores given by all 53 readers to each image was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. For the average reader, the AUC for gist, DL, and the SVM, were 0.76 (CI: 0.62–0.86), 0.79 (CI: 0.63–0.89), and 0.88 (CI: 0.79–0.94). For all readers with a gist AUC significantly better than chance-level, the SVM outperformed DL. The gist signal provided malignancy evidence with no or weak associations with the information captured by humans in normal radiologic reporting, which involves detailed mammogram inspection. Adding gist signal to a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool improved its performance for the breast cancer detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8505651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85056512021-10-13 Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection Gandomkar, Ziba Siviengphanom, Somphone Ekpo, Ernest U. Suleiman, Mo’ayyad Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli Li, Tong Xu, Dong Evans, Karla K. Lewis, Sarah J. Wolfe, Jeremy M. Brennan, Patrick C. Sci Rep Article The information captured by the gist signal, which refers to radiologists’ first impression arising from an initial global image processing, is poorly understood. We examined whether the gist signal can provide complementary information to data captured by radiologists (experiment 1), or computer algorithms (experiment 2) based on detailed mammogram inspection. In the first experiment, 19 radiologists assessed a case set twice, once based on a half-second image presentation (i.e., gist signal) and once in the usual viewing condition. Their performances in two viewing conditions were compared using repeated measure correlation (rm-corr). The cancer cases (19 cases × 19 readers) exhibited non-significant trend with rm-corr = 0.012 (p = 0.82, CI: −0.09, 0.12). For normal cases (41 cases × 19 readers), a weak correlation of rm-corr = 0.238 (p < 0.001, CI: 0.17, 0.30) was found. In the second experiment, we combined the abnormality score from a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool (DL) with the radiological gist signal using a support vector machine (SVM). To obtain the gist signal, 53 radiologists assessed images based on half-second image presentation. The SVM performance for each radiologist and an average reader, whose gist responses were the mean abnormality scores given by all 53 readers to each image was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. For the average reader, the AUC for gist, DL, and the SVM, were 0.76 (CI: 0.62–0.86), 0.79 (CI: 0.63–0.89), and 0.88 (CI: 0.79–0.94). For all readers with a gist AUC significantly better than chance-level, the SVM outperformed DL. The gist signal provided malignancy evidence with no or weak associations with the information captured by humans in normal radiologic reporting, which involves detailed mammogram inspection. Adding gist signal to a state-of-the-art deep learning-based tool improved its performance for the breast cancer detection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8505651/ /pubmed/34635726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99582-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gandomkar, Ziba Siviengphanom, Somphone Ekpo, Ernest U. Suleiman, Mo’ayyad Taba, Seyedamir Tavakoli Li, Tong Xu, Dong Evans, Karla K. Lewis, Sarah J. Wolfe, Jeremy M. Brennan, Patrick C. Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title | Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title_full | Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title_fullStr | Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title_full_unstemmed | Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title_short | Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
title_sort | global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99582-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandomkarziba globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT siviengphanomsomphone globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT ekpoernestu globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT suleimanmoayyad globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT tabaseyedamirtavakoli globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT litong globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT xudong globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT evanskarlak globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT lewissarahj globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT wolfejeremym globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection AT brennanpatrickc globalprocessingprovidesmalignancyevidencecomplementarytotheinformationcapturedbyhumansormachinesfollowingdetailedmammograminspection |