Cargando…
Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance
The present research attempted to extend prior research that showed that thin-slices of pre-performance nonverbal behavior (NVB) of professional darts players gives valid information to observers about subsequent performance tendencies. Specifically, we investigated what kind of nonverbal cues were...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99729-4 |
_version_ | 1784581580011864064 |
---|---|
author | Furley, Philip Klingner, Florian Memmert, Daniel |
author_facet | Furley, Philip Klingner, Florian Memmert, Daniel |
author_sort | Furley, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present research attempted to extend prior research that showed that thin-slices of pre-performance nonverbal behavior (NVB) of professional darts players gives valid information to observers about subsequent performance tendencies. Specifically, we investigated what kind of nonverbal cues were associated with success and informed thin-slice ratings. Participants (N = 61) were first asked to estimate the performance of a random sample of videos showing the preparatory NVB of professional darts players (N = 47) either performing well (470 clips) or poorly (470 clips). Preparatory NVB was assessed via preparation times and Active Appearance Modeling using Noldus FaceReader. Results showed that observers could distinguish between good and poor performance based on thin-slices of preparatory NVB (p = 0.001, d = 0.87). Further analyses showed that facial expressions prior to poor performance showed more arousal (p = 0.011, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.10), sadness (p = 0.040, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.04), and anxiety (p = 0.009, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.09) and preparation times were shorter (p = 0.001, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.36) prior to poor performance than good performance. Lens model analyses showed preparation times (p = 0.001, rho = 0.18), neutral (p = 0.001, rho = 0.13), sad (rho = 0.12), and facial expressions of arousal (p = 0.001, rho = 0.11) to be correlated with observers’ performance ratings. Hence, preparation times and facial cues associated with a player’s level of arousal, neutrality, and sadness seem to be valid nonverbal cues that observers utilize to infer information about subsequent perceptual-motor performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8505661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85056612021-10-13 Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance Furley, Philip Klingner, Florian Memmert, Daniel Sci Rep Article The present research attempted to extend prior research that showed that thin-slices of pre-performance nonverbal behavior (NVB) of professional darts players gives valid information to observers about subsequent performance tendencies. Specifically, we investigated what kind of nonverbal cues were associated with success and informed thin-slice ratings. Participants (N = 61) were first asked to estimate the performance of a random sample of videos showing the preparatory NVB of professional darts players (N = 47) either performing well (470 clips) or poorly (470 clips). Preparatory NVB was assessed via preparation times and Active Appearance Modeling using Noldus FaceReader. Results showed that observers could distinguish between good and poor performance based on thin-slices of preparatory NVB (p = 0.001, d = 0.87). Further analyses showed that facial expressions prior to poor performance showed more arousal (p = 0.011, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.10), sadness (p = 0.040, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.04), and anxiety (p = 0.009, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.09) and preparation times were shorter (p = 0.001, ƞ(2)(p) = 0.36) prior to poor performance than good performance. Lens model analyses showed preparation times (p = 0.001, rho = 0.18), neutral (p = 0.001, rho = 0.13), sad (rho = 0.12), and facial expressions of arousal (p = 0.001, rho = 0.11) to be correlated with observers’ performance ratings. Hence, preparation times and facial cues associated with a player’s level of arousal, neutrality, and sadness seem to be valid nonverbal cues that observers utilize to infer information about subsequent perceptual-motor performance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8505661/ /pubmed/34635761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99729-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Furley, Philip Klingner, Florian Memmert, Daniel Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title | Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title_full | Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title_fullStr | Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title_short | Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
title_sort | nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8505661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99729-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furleyphilip nonverbalpreperformanceexpressionsofprofessionaldartsplayersdistinguishbetweengoodandpoorperformance AT klingnerflorian nonverbalpreperformanceexpressionsofprofessionaldartsplayersdistinguishbetweengoodandpoorperformance AT memmertdaniel nonverbalpreperformanceexpressionsofprofessionaldartsplayersdistinguishbetweengoodandpoorperformance |