Cargando…

A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)

Background: Leishmaniasis is a globally important yet neglected parasitic disease transmitted by phlebotomine sand flies. With new candidate vaccines in or near the clinic, a controlled human challenge model (CHIM) using natural sand fly challenge would provide a method for early evaluation of proph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkash, Vivak, Ashwin, Helen, Sadlova, Jovana, Vojtkova, Barbora, Jones, Georgina, Martin, Nina, Greensted, Elizabeth, Allgar, Victoria, Kamhawi, Shaden, Valenzuela, Jesus G., Layton, Alison M., Jaffe, Charles L., Volf, Petr, Kaye, Paul M., Lacey, Charles J. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34693027
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16870.1
_version_ 1784581692973907968
author Parkash, Vivak
Ashwin, Helen
Sadlova, Jovana
Vojtkova, Barbora
Jones, Georgina
Martin, Nina
Greensted, Elizabeth
Allgar, Victoria
Kamhawi, Shaden
Valenzuela, Jesus G.
Layton, Alison M.
Jaffe, Charles L.
Volf, Petr
Kaye, Paul M.
Lacey, Charles J. N.
author_facet Parkash, Vivak
Ashwin, Helen
Sadlova, Jovana
Vojtkova, Barbora
Jones, Georgina
Martin, Nina
Greensted, Elizabeth
Allgar, Victoria
Kamhawi, Shaden
Valenzuela, Jesus G.
Layton, Alison M.
Jaffe, Charles L.
Volf, Petr
Kaye, Paul M.
Lacey, Charles J. N.
author_sort Parkash, Vivak
collection PubMed
description Background: Leishmaniasis is a globally important yet neglected parasitic disease transmitted by phlebotomine sand flies. With new candidate vaccines in or near the clinic, a controlled human challenge model (CHIM) using natural sand fly challenge would provide a method for early evaluation of prophylactic efficacy. Methods : We evaluated the biting frequency and adverse effects resulting from exposure of human volunteers to bites of either Phlebotomus papatasi or P. duboscqi, two natural vectors of Leishmania major. 12 healthy participants were recruited (mean age 40.2 ± 11.8 years) with no history of significant travel to regions where L. major-transmitting sand flies are prevalent. Participants were assigned to either vector by 1:1 allocation and exposed to five female sand flies for 30 minutes in a custom biting chamber. Bite frequency was recorded to confirm a bloodmeal was taken. Participant responses and safety outcomes were monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS), clinical examination, and blood biochemistry. Focus groups were subsequently conducted to explore participant acceptability. Results: All participants had at least one successful sand fly bite with none reporting any serious adverse events, with median VAS scores of 0-1/10 out to day 21 post-sand fly bite. Corresponding assessment of sand flies confirmed that for each participant at least 1/5 sand flies had successfully taken a bloodmeal (overall mean 3.67±1.03 bites per participant). There was no significant difference between P. papatasi and P. duboscqi in the number of bites resulting from 5 sand flies applied to human participants (3.3±0.81 vs 3.00±1.27 bites per participant; p=0.56) .  In the two focus groups (n=5 per group), themes relating to positive participant-reported experiences of being bitten and the overall study, were identified. Conclusions: These results validate a protocol for achieving successful sand fly bites in humans that is safe, well-tolerated and acceptable for participants. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03999970 (27/06/2019)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8506224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85062242021-10-22 A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study) Parkash, Vivak Ashwin, Helen Sadlova, Jovana Vojtkova, Barbora Jones, Georgina Martin, Nina Greensted, Elizabeth Allgar, Victoria Kamhawi, Shaden Valenzuela, Jesus G. Layton, Alison M. Jaffe, Charles L. Volf, Petr Kaye, Paul M. Lacey, Charles J. N. Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Leishmaniasis is a globally important yet neglected parasitic disease transmitted by phlebotomine sand flies. With new candidate vaccines in or near the clinic, a controlled human challenge model (CHIM) using natural sand fly challenge would provide a method for early evaluation of prophylactic efficacy. Methods : We evaluated the biting frequency and adverse effects resulting from exposure of human volunteers to bites of either Phlebotomus papatasi or P. duboscqi, two natural vectors of Leishmania major. 12 healthy participants were recruited (mean age 40.2 ± 11.8 years) with no history of significant travel to regions where L. major-transmitting sand flies are prevalent. Participants were assigned to either vector by 1:1 allocation and exposed to five female sand flies for 30 minutes in a custom biting chamber. Bite frequency was recorded to confirm a bloodmeal was taken. Participant responses and safety outcomes were monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS), clinical examination, and blood biochemistry. Focus groups were subsequently conducted to explore participant acceptability. Results: All participants had at least one successful sand fly bite with none reporting any serious adverse events, with median VAS scores of 0-1/10 out to day 21 post-sand fly bite. Corresponding assessment of sand flies confirmed that for each participant at least 1/5 sand flies had successfully taken a bloodmeal (overall mean 3.67±1.03 bites per participant). There was no significant difference between P. papatasi and P. duboscqi in the number of bites resulting from 5 sand flies applied to human participants (3.3±0.81 vs 3.00±1.27 bites per participant; p=0.56) .  In the two focus groups (n=5 per group), themes relating to positive participant-reported experiences of being bitten and the overall study, were identified. Conclusions: These results validate a protocol for achieving successful sand fly bites in humans that is safe, well-tolerated and acceptable for participants. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03999970 (27/06/2019) F1000 Research Limited 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8506224/ /pubmed/34693027 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16870.1 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Parkash V et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The author(s) is/are employees of the US Government and therefore domestic copyright protection in USA does not apply to this work. The work may be protected under the copyright laws of other jurisdictions when used in those jurisdictions.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parkash, Vivak
Ashwin, Helen
Sadlova, Jovana
Vojtkova, Barbora
Jones, Georgina
Martin, Nina
Greensted, Elizabeth
Allgar, Victoria
Kamhawi, Shaden
Valenzuela, Jesus G.
Layton, Alison M.
Jaffe, Charles L.
Volf, Petr
Kaye, Paul M.
Lacey, Charles J. N.
A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title_full A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title_fullStr A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title_full_unstemmed A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title_short A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)
title_sort clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the flybite study)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34693027
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16870.1
work_keys_str_mv AT parkashvivak aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT ashwinhelen aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT sadlovajovana aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT vojtkovabarbora aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT jonesgeorgina aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT martinnina aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT greenstedelizabeth aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT allgarvictoria aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT kamhawishaden aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT valenzuelajesusg aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT laytonalisonm aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT jaffecharlesl aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT volfpetr aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT kayepaulm aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT laceycharlesjn aclinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT parkashvivak clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT ashwinhelen clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT sadlovajovana clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT vojtkovabarbora clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT jonesgeorgina clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT martinnina clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT greenstedelizabeth clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT allgarvictoria clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT kamhawishaden clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT valenzuelajesusg clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT laytonalisonm clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT jaffecharlesl clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT volfpetr clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT kayepaulm clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy
AT laceycharlesjn clinicalstudytooptimiseasandflybitingprotocolforuseinacontrolledhumaninfectionmodelofcutaneousleishmaniasistheflybitestudy