Diagnostic performance of CT-derived resting distal to aortic pressure ratio (resting Pd/Pa) vs. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in coronary lesion severity assessment

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has emerged as a promising non-invasive substitute for fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Normally, CT-FFR providing functional significance of coronary artery disease (CAD) by using a simplified total coronary resistance index (TCRI) model. Yet the error or discrepancy caused by this simplified model remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 20 consecutive patients with suspected CAD who underwent CTA and invasive FFR measurement were retrospectively analyzed. CT-FFR and CT-(Pd/Pa)(rest) values derived from the coronary CTA images. The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and CT-(Pd/Pa)(rest) were evaluated on a per-vessel level using C statistics with invasive FFR<0.80 as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of the 25 vessels eventually analyzed, the prevalence of functionally significant CAD were 64%. The Youden index of the ROC curve indicated that the best cutoff value of invasive resting Pd/Pa was 0.945 for identifying functionally significant lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy were 85%, 91%, 92%, 83% and 88% for CT-(Pd/Pa)(rest) and 85%, 58% 69%, 78% and 72% for CT-FFR. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) to detect functionally significant stenoses of CT-(Pd/Pa)(rest) and CT-FFR were 0.87 and 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the results suggest CT-derived resting Pd/Pa has a potential advantage over CT-FFR in triaging patients for revascularization.