Cargando…

Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods for training medical interns in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: A tertiary-care teaching hospital, Sydney, January 2018–February 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 72 of 90 medical in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyer, Mary, Hor, Su-Yin, Barratt, Ruth, Gilbert, G L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052985
_version_ 1784581770386079744
author Wyer, Mary
Hor, Su-Yin
Barratt, Ruth
Gilbert, G L
author_facet Wyer, Mary
Hor, Su-Yin
Barratt, Ruth
Gilbert, G L
author_sort Wyer, Mary
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods for training medical interns in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: A tertiary-care teaching hospital, Sydney, January 2018–February 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 72 of 90 medical interns consented to participate. Of these, 39 completed all three time points. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received a standard infection prevention and control (IPC) education module during their hospital orientation. They were then allocated alternately to a control or video group. At three time points (TPs) over the year, participants were asked to don/doff PPE items based on hospital protocol. At the first two TPs, all participants also participated in a reflexive discussion. At the second and third TPs, all participants were audited on their performance. The only difference between groups was that the video group was videoed while donning/doffing PPE, and they watched this footage as a stimulus for reflexive discussion. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy and acceptability of the intervention were assessed using: (1) comparisons of audit performance between and within groups over time, (2) comparisons between groups on survey responses for evaluation of training and self-efficacy and (3) thematic analysis of reflexive discussions. RESULTS: Both groups improved in their PPE competence over time, although there was no consistent pattern of significant differences within and between groups. No significant differences were found between groups on reported acceptability of training, or self-efficacy for PPE use. However, analysis of reflexive discussions shows that the effects of the video-reflexive intervention were tangible and different in important respects from standard training. CONCLUSIONS: Video reflexivity in group-based training can assist new clinicians in engagement with, and better understanding of, IPC in their clinical practice. Our study also highlights the need for ongoing and targeted IPC training during medical undergraduate studies as well as regular workplace refresher training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8506871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85068712021-10-22 Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study Wyer, Mary Hor, Su-Yin Barratt, Ruth Gilbert, G L BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods for training medical interns in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: A tertiary-care teaching hospital, Sydney, January 2018–February 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 72 of 90 medical interns consented to participate. Of these, 39 completed all three time points. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received a standard infection prevention and control (IPC) education module during their hospital orientation. They were then allocated alternately to a control or video group. At three time points (TPs) over the year, participants were asked to don/doff PPE items based on hospital protocol. At the first two TPs, all participants also participated in a reflexive discussion. At the second and third TPs, all participants were audited on their performance. The only difference between groups was that the video group was videoed while donning/doffing PPE, and they watched this footage as a stimulus for reflexive discussion. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy and acceptability of the intervention were assessed using: (1) comparisons of audit performance between and within groups over time, (2) comparisons between groups on survey responses for evaluation of training and self-efficacy and (3) thematic analysis of reflexive discussions. RESULTS: Both groups improved in their PPE competence over time, although there was no consistent pattern of significant differences within and between groups. No significant differences were found between groups on reported acceptability of training, or self-efficacy for PPE use. However, analysis of reflexive discussions shows that the effects of the video-reflexive intervention were tangible and different in important respects from standard training. CONCLUSIONS: Video reflexivity in group-based training can assist new clinicians in engagement with, and better understanding of, IPC in their clinical practice. Our study also highlights the need for ongoing and targeted IPC training during medical undergraduate studies as well as regular workplace refresher training. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8506871/ /pubmed/34635528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052985 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Wyer, Mary
Hor, Su-Yin
Barratt, Ruth
Gilbert, G L
Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title_full Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title_short Testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
title_sort testing the efficacy and acceptability of video-reflexive methods in personal protective equipment training for medical interns: a mixed methods study
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34635528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052985
work_keys_str_mv AT wyermary testingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofvideoreflexivemethodsinpersonalprotectiveequipmenttrainingformedicalinternsamixedmethodsstudy
AT horsuyin testingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofvideoreflexivemethodsinpersonalprotectiveequipmenttrainingformedicalinternsamixedmethodsstudy
AT barrattruth testingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofvideoreflexivemethodsinpersonalprotectiveequipmenttrainingformedicalinternsamixedmethodsstudy
AT gilbertgl testingtheefficacyandacceptabilityofvideoreflexivemethodsinpersonalprotectiveequipmenttrainingformedicalinternsamixedmethodsstudy