Cargando…

The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been widely described as an infodemic, an excess of rapidly circulating information in social and traditional media in which some information may be erroneous, contradictory, or inaccurate. One key theme cutting across many infodemic analyses is that it stymies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heyerdahl, Leonardo W, Lana, Benedetta, Giles-Vernick, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27472
_version_ 1784581852209610752
author Heyerdahl, Leonardo W
Lana, Benedetta
Giles-Vernick, Tamara
author_facet Heyerdahl, Leonardo W
Lana, Benedetta
Giles-Vernick, Tamara
author_sort Heyerdahl, Leonardo W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been widely described as an infodemic, an excess of rapidly circulating information in social and traditional media in which some information may be erroneous, contradictory, or inaccurate. One key theme cutting across many infodemic analyses is that it stymies users’ capacities to identify appropriate information and guidelines, encourages them to take inappropriate or even harmful actions, and should be managed through multiple transdisciplinary approaches. Yet, investigations demonstrating how the COVID-19 information ecosystem influences complex public decision making and behavior offline are relatively few. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether information reported through the social media channel Twitter, linked articles and websites, and selected traditional media affected the risk perception, engagement in field activities, and protective behaviors of French Red Cross (FRC) volunteers and health workers in the Paris region of France from June to October 2020. METHODS: We used a hybrid approach that blended online and offline data. We tracked daily Twitter discussions and selected traditional media in France for 7 months, qualitatively evaluating COVID-19 claims and debates about nonpharmaceutical protective measures. We conducted 24 semistructured interviews with FRC workers and volunteers. RESULTS: Social and traditional media debates about viral risks and nonpharmaceutical interventions fanned anxieties among FRC volunteers and workers. Decisions to continue conducting FRC field activities and daily protective practices were also influenced by other factors unrelated to the infodemic: familial and social obligations, gender expectations, financial pressures, FRC rules and communications, state regulations, and relationships with coworkers. Some respondents developed strategies for “tuning out” social and traditional media. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the information ecosystem may be just one among multiple influences on one group’s offline perceptions and behavior. Measures to address users who have disengaged from online sources of health information and who rely on social relationships to obtain information are needed. Tuning out can potentially lead to less informed decision making, leading to worse health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8507423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85074232021-10-12 The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study Heyerdahl, Leonardo W Lana, Benedetta Giles-Vernick, Tamara JMIR Infodemiology Original Paper BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has been widely described as an infodemic, an excess of rapidly circulating information in social and traditional media in which some information may be erroneous, contradictory, or inaccurate. One key theme cutting across many infodemic analyses is that it stymies users’ capacities to identify appropriate information and guidelines, encourages them to take inappropriate or even harmful actions, and should be managed through multiple transdisciplinary approaches. Yet, investigations demonstrating how the COVID-19 information ecosystem influences complex public decision making and behavior offline are relatively few. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether information reported through the social media channel Twitter, linked articles and websites, and selected traditional media affected the risk perception, engagement in field activities, and protective behaviors of French Red Cross (FRC) volunteers and health workers in the Paris region of France from June to October 2020. METHODS: We used a hybrid approach that blended online and offline data. We tracked daily Twitter discussions and selected traditional media in France for 7 months, qualitatively evaluating COVID-19 claims and debates about nonpharmaceutical protective measures. We conducted 24 semistructured interviews with FRC workers and volunteers. RESULTS: Social and traditional media debates about viral risks and nonpharmaceutical interventions fanned anxieties among FRC volunteers and workers. Decisions to continue conducting FRC field activities and daily protective practices were also influenced by other factors unrelated to the infodemic: familial and social obligations, gender expectations, financial pressures, FRC rules and communications, state regulations, and relationships with coworkers. Some respondents developed strategies for “tuning out” social and traditional media. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the information ecosystem may be just one among multiple influences on one group’s offline perceptions and behavior. Measures to address users who have disengaged from online sources of health information and who rely on social relationships to obtain information are needed. Tuning out can potentially lead to less informed decision making, leading to worse health outcomes. JMIR Publications 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8507423/ /pubmed/34661065 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27472 Text en ©Leonardo W Heyerdahl, Benedetta Lana, Tamara Giles-Vernick. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 06.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://infodemiology.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Heyerdahl, Leonardo W
Lana, Benedetta
Giles-Vernick, Tamara
The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title_full The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title_short The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors’ Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort impact of the online covid-19 infodemic on french red cross actors’ field engagement and protective behaviors: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661065
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27472
work_keys_str_mv AT heyerdahlleonardow theimpactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy
AT lanabenedetta theimpactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy
AT gilesvernicktamara theimpactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy
AT heyerdahlleonardow impactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy
AT lanabenedetta impactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy
AT gilesvernicktamara impactoftheonlinecovid19infodemiconfrenchredcrossactorsfieldengagementandprotectivebehaviorsmixedmethodsstudy