Cargando…
SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS
Automatic segmentation of bones in computed tomography (CT) images is used for instance in beam hardening correction algorithms where it improves the accuracy of resulting CT numbers. Of special interest are pelvic bones, which—because of their strong attenuation—affect the accuracy of brachytherapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab073 |
_version_ | 1784581856784547840 |
---|---|
author | Jeuthe, Julius Sánchez, José Carlos González Magnusson, Maria Sandborg, Michael Tedgren, Åsa Carlsson Malusek, Alexandr |
author_facet | Jeuthe, Julius Sánchez, José Carlos González Magnusson, Maria Sandborg, Michael Tedgren, Åsa Carlsson Malusek, Alexandr |
author_sort | Jeuthe, Julius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automatic segmentation of bones in computed tomography (CT) images is used for instance in beam hardening correction algorithms where it improves the accuracy of resulting CT numbers. Of special interest are pelvic bones, which—because of their strong attenuation—affect the accuracy of brachytherapy in this region. This work evaluated the performance of the JJ2016 algorithm with the performance of MK2014v2 and JS2018 algorithms; all these algorithms were developed by authors. Visual comparison, and, in the latter case, also Dice similarity coefficients derived from the ground truth were used. It was found that the 3D-based JJ2016 performed better than the 2D-based MK2014v2, mainly because of the more accurate hole filling that benefitted from information in adjacent slices. The neural network-based JS2018 outperformed both traditional algorithms. It was, however, limited to the resolution of 128(3) owing to the limited amount of memory in the graphical processing unit (GPU). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8507443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85074432021-10-13 SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS Jeuthe, Julius Sánchez, José Carlos González Magnusson, Maria Sandborg, Michael Tedgren, Åsa Carlsson Malusek, Alexandr Radiat Prot Dosimetry Paper Automatic segmentation of bones in computed tomography (CT) images is used for instance in beam hardening correction algorithms where it improves the accuracy of resulting CT numbers. Of special interest are pelvic bones, which—because of their strong attenuation—affect the accuracy of brachytherapy in this region. This work evaluated the performance of the JJ2016 algorithm with the performance of MK2014v2 and JS2018 algorithms; all these algorithms were developed by authors. Visual comparison, and, in the latter case, also Dice similarity coefficients derived from the ground truth were used. It was found that the 3D-based JJ2016 performed better than the 2D-based MK2014v2, mainly because of the more accurate hole filling that benefitted from information in adjacent slices. The neural network-based JS2018 outperformed both traditional algorithms. It was, however, limited to the resolution of 128(3) owing to the limited amount of memory in the graphical processing unit (GPU). Oxford University Press 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8507443/ /pubmed/34037238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab073 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Paper Jeuthe, Julius Sánchez, José Carlos González Magnusson, Maria Sandborg, Michael Tedgren, Åsa Carlsson Malusek, Alexandr SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title | SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title_full | SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title_fullStr | SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title_full_unstemmed | SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title_short | SEMI-AUTOMATED 3D SEGMENTATION OF PELVIC REGION BONES IN CT VOLUMES FOR THE ANNOTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING DATASETS |
title_sort | semi-automated 3d segmentation of pelvic region bones in ct volumes for the annotation of machine learning datasets |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34037238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeuthejulius semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets AT sanchezjosecarlosgonzalez semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets AT magnussonmaria semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets AT sandborgmichael semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets AT tedgrenasacarlsson semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets AT malusekalexandr semiautomated3dsegmentationofpelvicregionbonesinctvolumesfortheannotationofmachinelearningdatasets |