Cargando…

EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC

In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorén, Fredrik, Johnsson, Åse A, Hellström, Mikael, Båth, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054
_version_ 1784581859327344640
author Thorén, Fredrik
Johnsson, Åse A
Hellström, Mikael
Båth, Magnus
author_facet Thorén, Fredrik
Johnsson, Åse A
Hellström, Mikael
Båth, Magnus
author_sort Thorén, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CTC on the detection and characterisation of extracolonic findings. In a prospective study 49 patients with colorectal symptoms were examined with CTC adding a ULD series (mean effective dose 0.9 ± 0.4 mSv) to the normal unenhanced standard dose (SD) series (mean effective dose 3.6 ± 1.2 mSv). Five radiologists individually and blindly evaluated the ULD, followed by evaluation of the SD after ≥9 weeks (median 35 weeks). A ViewDEX-based examination protocol was used, including a confidence scale and a graded assessment of need for follow-up according to the CTC Reporting and Data System (C-RADS E0–E4). The reference findings comprised the combined information from CTC (ULD, SD and contrast-enhanced CTC series) and a 4-year radiological and clinical follow-up. For the overall detection of reference findings (E2–E4) we found a statistically significant difference in favour of SD. This, however, was not the case when looking at classification of possibly important/important reference findings (E3–E4). Our results suggest that CTC with ULD (0.9 mSv) is comparable to SD (3.6 mSv) for identification of clinically relevant extracolonic pathology, but there is a large inter-observer variability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8507454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85074542021-10-13 EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC Thorén, Fredrik Johnsson, Åse A Hellström, Mikael Båth, Magnus Radiat Prot Dosimetry Paper In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CTC on the detection and characterisation of extracolonic findings. In a prospective study 49 patients with colorectal symptoms were examined with CTC adding a ULD series (mean effective dose 0.9 ± 0.4 mSv) to the normal unenhanced standard dose (SD) series (mean effective dose 3.6 ± 1.2 mSv). Five radiologists individually and blindly evaluated the ULD, followed by evaluation of the SD after ≥9 weeks (median 35 weeks). A ViewDEX-based examination protocol was used, including a confidence scale and a graded assessment of need for follow-up according to the CTC Reporting and Data System (C-RADS E0–E4). The reference findings comprised the combined information from CTC (ULD, SD and contrast-enhanced CTC series) and a 4-year radiological and clinical follow-up. For the overall detection of reference findings (E2–E4) we found a statistically significant difference in favour of SD. This, however, was not the case when looking at classification of possibly important/important reference findings (E3–E4). Our results suggest that CTC with ULD (0.9 mSv) is comparable to SD (3.6 mSv) for identification of clinically relevant extracolonic pathology, but there is a large inter-observer variability. Oxford University Press 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8507454/ /pubmed/33855447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Paper
Thorén, Fredrik
Johnsson, Åse A
Hellström, Mikael
Båth, Magnus
EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title_full EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title_fullStr EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title_full_unstemmed EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title_short EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
title_sort extracolonic findings—identification at low-dose ctc
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054
work_keys_str_mv AT thorenfredrik extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc
AT johnssonasea extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc
AT hellstrommikael extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc
AT bathmagnus extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc