Cargando…
EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC
In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054 |
_version_ | 1784581859327344640 |
---|---|
author | Thorén, Fredrik Johnsson, Åse A Hellström, Mikael Båth, Magnus |
author_facet | Thorén, Fredrik Johnsson, Åse A Hellström, Mikael Båth, Magnus |
author_sort | Thorén, Fredrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CTC on the detection and characterisation of extracolonic findings. In a prospective study 49 patients with colorectal symptoms were examined with CTC adding a ULD series (mean effective dose 0.9 ± 0.4 mSv) to the normal unenhanced standard dose (SD) series (mean effective dose 3.6 ± 1.2 mSv). Five radiologists individually and blindly evaluated the ULD, followed by evaluation of the SD after ≥9 weeks (median 35 weeks). A ViewDEX-based examination protocol was used, including a confidence scale and a graded assessment of need for follow-up according to the CTC Reporting and Data System (C-RADS E0–E4). The reference findings comprised the combined information from CTC (ULD, SD and contrast-enhanced CTC series) and a 4-year radiological and clinical follow-up. For the overall detection of reference findings (E2–E4) we found a statistically significant difference in favour of SD. This, however, was not the case when looking at classification of possibly important/important reference findings (E3–E4). Our results suggest that CTC with ULD (0.9 mSv) is comparable to SD (3.6 mSv) for identification of clinically relevant extracolonic pathology, but there is a large inter-observer variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8507454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85074542021-10-13 EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC Thorén, Fredrik Johnsson, Åse A Hellström, Mikael Båth, Magnus Radiat Prot Dosimetry Paper In contrast to optical colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) has the ability to reveal pathology outside of the colon. While identification of colorectal lesions at CTC requires only limited radiation dose, the detection of abnormalities in extracolonic soft tissue requires more radiation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CTC on the detection and characterisation of extracolonic findings. In a prospective study 49 patients with colorectal symptoms were examined with CTC adding a ULD series (mean effective dose 0.9 ± 0.4 mSv) to the normal unenhanced standard dose (SD) series (mean effective dose 3.6 ± 1.2 mSv). Five radiologists individually and blindly evaluated the ULD, followed by evaluation of the SD after ≥9 weeks (median 35 weeks). A ViewDEX-based examination protocol was used, including a confidence scale and a graded assessment of need for follow-up according to the CTC Reporting and Data System (C-RADS E0–E4). The reference findings comprised the combined information from CTC (ULD, SD and contrast-enhanced CTC series) and a 4-year radiological and clinical follow-up. For the overall detection of reference findings (E2–E4) we found a statistically significant difference in favour of SD. This, however, was not the case when looking at classification of possibly important/important reference findings (E3–E4). Our results suggest that CTC with ULD (0.9 mSv) is comparable to SD (3.6 mSv) for identification of clinically relevant extracolonic pathology, but there is a large inter-observer variability. Oxford University Press 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8507454/ /pubmed/33855447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Paper Thorén, Fredrik Johnsson, Åse A Hellström, Mikael Båth, Magnus EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title | EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title_full | EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title_fullStr | EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title_full_unstemmed | EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title_short | EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS—IDENTIFICATION AT LOW-DOSE CTC |
title_sort | extracolonic findings—identification at low-dose ctc |
topic | Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thorenfredrik extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc AT johnssonasea extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc AT hellstrommikael extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc AT bathmagnus extracolonicfindingsidentificationatlowdosectc |