Cargando…

OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA

The choice of the material base to which the material decomposition is performed in dual-energy computed tomography may affect the quality of reconstructed images. The aim of this work is to investigate how the commonly used bases (water, bone), (water, iodine) and (photoelectric effect, Compton sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magnusson, Maria, Alm Carlsson, Gudrun, Sandborg, Michael, Carlsson Tedgren, Åsa, Malusek, Alexandr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34240219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab097
_version_ 1784581863239581696
author Magnusson, Maria
Alm Carlsson, Gudrun
Sandborg, Michael
Carlsson Tedgren, Åsa
Malusek, Alexandr
author_facet Magnusson, Maria
Alm Carlsson, Gudrun
Sandborg, Michael
Carlsson Tedgren, Åsa
Malusek, Alexandr
author_sort Magnusson, Maria
collection PubMed
description The choice of the material base to which the material decomposition is performed in dual-energy computed tomography may affect the quality of reconstructed images. The aim of this work is to investigate how the commonly used bases (water, bone), (water, iodine) and (photoelectric effect, Compton scattering) affect the reconstructed linear attenuation coefficient in the case of the Alvarez–Macovski method. The performance of this method is also compared with the performance of the Dual-energy Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (DIRA). In both cases, the study is performed using simulations. The results show that the Alvarez–Macovski method produced artefacts when iodine was present in the phantom together with human tissues since this method can only work with one doublet. It was shown that these artefacts could be avoided with DIRA using the (water, bone) doublet for tissues and the (water, iodine) doublet for the iodine solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8507470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85074702021-10-13 OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA Magnusson, Maria Alm Carlsson, Gudrun Sandborg, Michael Carlsson Tedgren, Åsa Malusek, Alexandr Radiat Prot Dosimetry Articles The choice of the material base to which the material decomposition is performed in dual-energy computed tomography may affect the quality of reconstructed images. The aim of this work is to investigate how the commonly used bases (water, bone), (water, iodine) and (photoelectric effect, Compton scattering) affect the reconstructed linear attenuation coefficient in the case of the Alvarez–Macovski method. The performance of this method is also compared with the performance of the Dual-energy Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (DIRA). In both cases, the study is performed using simulations. The results show that the Alvarez–Macovski method produced artefacts when iodine was present in the phantom together with human tissues since this method can only work with one doublet. It was shown that these artefacts could be avoided with DIRA using the (water, bone) doublet for tissues and the (water, iodine) doublet for the iodine solution. Oxford University Press 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8507470/ /pubmed/34240219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab097 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Magnusson, Maria
Alm Carlsson, Gudrun
Sandborg, Michael
Carlsson Tedgren, Åsa
Malusek, Alexandr
OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title_full OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title_fullStr OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title_full_unstemmed OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title_short OPTIMAL SELECTION OF BASE MATERIALS FOR ACCURATE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ–MACOVSKI METHOD AND DIRA
title_sort optimal selection of base materials for accurate dual-energy computed tomography: comparison between the alvarez–macovski method and dira
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34240219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab097
work_keys_str_mv AT magnussonmaria optimalselectionofbasematerialsforaccuratedualenergycomputedtomographycomparisonbetweenthealvarezmacovskimethodanddira
AT almcarlssongudrun optimalselectionofbasematerialsforaccuratedualenergycomputedtomographycomparisonbetweenthealvarezmacovskimethodanddira
AT sandborgmichael optimalselectionofbasematerialsforaccuratedualenergycomputedtomographycomparisonbetweenthealvarezmacovskimethodanddira
AT carlssontedgrenasa optimalselectionofbasematerialsforaccuratedualenergycomputedtomographycomparisonbetweenthealvarezmacovskimethodanddira
AT malusekalexandr optimalselectionofbasematerialsforaccuratedualenergycomputedtomographycomparisonbetweenthealvarezmacovskimethodanddira