Cargando…

Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Liposuction is the most accepted technique for treatment of gynecomastia at present with or without residual gland tissue excision. Conventional liposuction uses incisions for introduction of cannula, made usually at the inframammary crease or axilla resulting in consequent scars. Cross-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singamsetty, Ratnakar, Rout, Sunil Kumar, Giri, Sanjay Kumar, Panda, Ritesh, Behera, Kishore Kumar, Sable, Mukund Namdev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02611-x
_version_ 1784581870398210048
author Singamsetty, Ratnakar
Rout, Sunil Kumar
Giri, Sanjay Kumar
Panda, Ritesh
Behera, Kishore Kumar
Sable, Mukund Namdev
author_facet Singamsetty, Ratnakar
Rout, Sunil Kumar
Giri, Sanjay Kumar
Panda, Ritesh
Behera, Kishore Kumar
Sable, Mukund Namdev
author_sort Singamsetty, Ratnakar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liposuction is the most accepted technique for treatment of gynecomastia at present with or without residual gland tissue excision. Conventional liposuction uses incisions for introduction of cannula, made usually at the inframammary crease or axilla resulting in consequent scars. Cross-chest liposuction technique was introduced to avoid these additional scars and improve the aesthetic outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between aesthetic outcome of conventional liposuction and cross-chest liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia. METHOD: A prospective comparative study between 2 groups with 15 patients in each was conducted, one with conventional and the other cross-chest liposuction. Excision of residual gland tissue was performed through circum-areolar incision in both the groups. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated in both the groups using Likert scale and compared. RESULT: The mean age of the patients was 22.6 years and the mean duration of presentation was 8.13 years. Satisfaction rate with conventional and cross-chest liposuction was 80% and 86%, respectively, as assessed by the patients. The rate was 80% and 77%, respectively, in both the groups as assessed by independent observer. The complication rate was 13.3% in conventional and 20% in cross-chest group. The difference in outcome was not statistically significant between two groups. Difference between the mean Likert scores of pre-operative and post-operative satisfaction was statistically significant for both the techniques. CONCLUSION: The conventional and the cross-chest liposuction, both yield comparable results when used for treatment of gynecomastia in terms of aesthetic outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8507502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85075022021-10-13 Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study Singamsetty, Ratnakar Rout, Sunil Kumar Giri, Sanjay Kumar Panda, Ritesh Behera, Kishore Kumar Sable, Mukund Namdev Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Liposuction is the most accepted technique for treatment of gynecomastia at present with or without residual gland tissue excision. Conventional liposuction uses incisions for introduction of cannula, made usually at the inframammary crease or axilla resulting in consequent scars. Cross-chest liposuction technique was introduced to avoid these additional scars and improve the aesthetic outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between aesthetic outcome of conventional liposuction and cross-chest liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia. METHOD: A prospective comparative study between 2 groups with 15 patients in each was conducted, one with conventional and the other cross-chest liposuction. Excision of residual gland tissue was performed through circum-areolar incision in both the groups. Aesthetic outcome was evaluated in both the groups using Likert scale and compared. RESULT: The mean age of the patients was 22.6 years and the mean duration of presentation was 8.13 years. Satisfaction rate with conventional and cross-chest liposuction was 80% and 86%, respectively, as assessed by the patients. The rate was 80% and 77%, respectively, in both the groups as assessed by independent observer. The complication rate was 13.3% in conventional and 20% in cross-chest group. The difference in outcome was not statistically significant between two groups. Difference between the mean Likert scores of pre-operative and post-operative satisfaction was statistically significant for both the techniques. CONCLUSION: The conventional and the cross-chest liposuction, both yield comparable results when used for treatment of gynecomastia in terms of aesthetic outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 Springer US 2021-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8507502/ /pubmed/34636927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02611-x Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singamsetty, Ratnakar
Rout, Sunil Kumar
Giri, Sanjay Kumar
Panda, Ritesh
Behera, Kishore Kumar
Sable, Mukund Namdev
Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title_full Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title_short Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study
title_sort aesthetic outcome of gynecomastia management with conventional liposuction and cross-chest liposuction: a prospective comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02611-x
work_keys_str_mv AT singamsettyratnakar aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT routsunilkumar aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT girisanjaykumar aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT pandaritesh aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT beherakishorekumar aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT sablemukundnamdev aestheticoutcomeofgynecomastiamanagementwithconventionalliposuctionandcrosschestliposuctionaprospectivecomparativestudy