Histone Deacetylase (HDAC)-1, -2, -4, and -6 in Uveal Melanomas: Associations with Clinicopathological Parameters and Patients’ Survival

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) have been reportedly associated with tumor development and progression in several types of human malignancy, being currently investigated as potential targets of anti-cancer therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical significance and prognostic role of the of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 immunohistochemical expression, in 75 uveal melanoma (UM) cases. HDACs are differentially expressed in UMs, HDAC-2 being the most frequently expressed isoform, whereas cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms is also observed. Additionally, HDAC-1 was associated with increased tumor size, HDAC-6 with mitotic index, and HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, both parameters of adverse prognosis. Moreover, our data support a significant association of HDAC-2 with patients’ improved OS. These findings suggest that HDACs, and especially HDAC-2, may be implicated in the formation and progression of UM. ABSTRACT: Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, exerting high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a key role in carcinogenesis, and HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are currently being explored as anti-cancer agents in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression in UM. Methods: HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression was examined immunohistochemically in 75 UM tissue specimens and was correlated with tumors’ clinicopathological characteristics, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS), as well as with our patients’ overall survival (OS). Results: HDAC-2 was the most frequently expressed isoform (66%), whereas we confirmed in addition to the expected nuclear expression the presence of cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms, namely HDAC-1 (33%) and HDAC-2 (9.5%). HDAC-4 and -6 expression was cytoplasmic. HDAC-1 nuclear expression was associated with increased tumor size (p = 0.03), HDAC-6 with higher mitotic index (p = 0.03), and nuclear HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology (p = 0.03) and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.04). The association with the remaining parameters including Monosomy 3 was not significant. Moreover, the presence as well as the nuclear expression pattern of HDAC-2 were correlated with patients’ improved OS and remained significant in multivariate survival analysis. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for a potential role of HDACs and especially HDAC-2 in the biological mechanisms governing UM evolution and progression.