Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool

The Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) examines the level of partner engagement in research studies. This study used mixed methods, including web-based surveys (N = 336), a modified Delphi process (N = 18), and cognitive response interviews (N = 16), with convenience sampling to develop and vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, Melody S., Ackermann, Nicole, Pierce, Kristyn A., Bowen, Deborah J., Thompson, Vetta Sanders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910020
_version_ 1784581968268099584
author Goodman, Melody S.
Ackermann, Nicole
Pierce, Kristyn A.
Bowen, Deborah J.
Thompson, Vetta Sanders
author_facet Goodman, Melody S.
Ackermann, Nicole
Pierce, Kristyn A.
Bowen, Deborah J.
Thompson, Vetta Sanders
author_sort Goodman, Melody S.
collection PubMed
description The Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) examines the level of partner engagement in research studies. This study used mixed methods, including web-based surveys (N = 336), a modified Delphi process (N = 18), and cognitive response interviews (N = 16), with convenience sampling to develop and validate a short version of the REST. We conducted factor analysis and calculated internal consistency for the condensed REST. We validated the condensed REST against the comprehensive REST. All analyses were carried out on two scales (quality and quantity) based on Likert-type response options. We examined convergent validity with other measures theoretically associated with the REST (e.g., the Community Engagement Research Index and the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool). This study produced a 9-item condensed version of the REST. The condensed REST loads on 1 factor, has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92 for the quantity scale; 0.94 for the quality scale), is significantly correlated (ρ = 0.97; p < 0.001 for both scales) with the comprehensive (32-item) REST, and has negligible, low, and moderate correlation with other measures (e.g., the Partnership Assessment In community-based Research, trust in medical researchers, and the Coalition Self-Assessment Survey). Use of the condensed REST will reduce participant burden and time to complete. This standardized and validated quantitative measure is useful to compare engagement across projects or within a project over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8507896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85078962021-10-13 Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool Goodman, Melody S. Ackermann, Nicole Pierce, Kristyn A. Bowen, Deborah J. Thompson, Vetta Sanders Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST) examines the level of partner engagement in research studies. This study used mixed methods, including web-based surveys (N = 336), a modified Delphi process (N = 18), and cognitive response interviews (N = 16), with convenience sampling to develop and validate a short version of the REST. We conducted factor analysis and calculated internal consistency for the condensed REST. We validated the condensed REST against the comprehensive REST. All analyses were carried out on two scales (quality and quantity) based on Likert-type response options. We examined convergent validity with other measures theoretically associated with the REST (e.g., the Community Engagement Research Index and the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool). This study produced a 9-item condensed version of the REST. The condensed REST loads on 1 factor, has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92 for the quantity scale; 0.94 for the quality scale), is significantly correlated (ρ = 0.97; p < 0.001 for both scales) with the comprehensive (32-item) REST, and has negligible, low, and moderate correlation with other measures (e.g., the Partnership Assessment In community-based Research, trust in medical researchers, and the Coalition Self-Assessment Survey). Use of the condensed REST will reduce participant burden and time to complete. This standardized and validated quantitative measure is useful to compare engagement across projects or within a project over time. MDPI 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8507896/ /pubmed/34639323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910020 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goodman, Melody S.
Ackermann, Nicole
Pierce, Kristyn A.
Bowen, Deborah J.
Thompson, Vetta Sanders
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title_full Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title_short Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Research Engagement Survey Tool
title_sort development and validation of a brief version of the research engagement survey tool
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910020
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmanmelodys developmentandvalidationofabriefversionoftheresearchengagementsurveytool
AT ackermannnicole developmentandvalidationofabriefversionoftheresearchengagementsurveytool
AT piercekristyna developmentandvalidationofabriefversionoftheresearchengagementsurveytool
AT bowendeborahj developmentandvalidationofabriefversionoftheresearchengagementsurveytool
AT thompsonvettasanders developmentandvalidationofabriefversionoftheresearchengagementsurveytool