Cargando…

Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection

Quantitative risk assessments for Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) necessitate estimates for key parameters such as the prevalence of infection, the probability of absence of infection in defined birth cohorts, and the numbers of BSE-infected, but non-detected cattle entering the food chain. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greiner, Matthias, Selhorst, Thomas, Balkema-Buschmann, Anne, Johnson, Wesley O., Müller-Graf, Christine, Conraths, Franz Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199966
_version_ 1784582060311052288
author Greiner, Matthias
Selhorst, Thomas
Balkema-Buschmann, Anne
Johnson, Wesley O.
Müller-Graf, Christine
Conraths, Franz Josef
author_facet Greiner, Matthias
Selhorst, Thomas
Balkema-Buschmann, Anne
Johnson, Wesley O.
Müller-Graf, Christine
Conraths, Franz Josef
author_sort Greiner, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Quantitative risk assessments for Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) necessitate estimates for key parameters such as the prevalence of infection, the probability of absence of infection in defined birth cohorts, and the numbers of BSE-infected, but non-detected cattle entering the food chain. We estimated three key parameters with adjustment for misclassification using the German BSE surveillance data using a Gompertz model for latent (i.e., unobserved) age-dependent detection probabilities and a Poisson response model for the number of BSE cases for birth cohorts 1999 to 2015. The models were combined in a Bayesian framework. We estimated the median true BSE prevalence between 3.74 and 0.216 cases per 100,000 animals for the birth cohorts 1990 to 2001 and observed a peak for the 1996 birth cohort with a point estimate of 16.41 cases per 100,000 cattle. For birth cohorts ranging from 2002 to 2013, the estimated median prevalence was below one case per 100,000 heads. The calculated confidence in freedom from disease (design prevalence 1 in 100,000) was above 99.5% for the birth cohorts 2002 to 2006. In conclusion, BSE surveillance in the healthy slaughtered cattle chain was extremely sensitive at the time, when BSE repeatedly occurred in Germany (2000–2009), because the entry of BSE-infected cattle into the food chain could virtually be prevented by the extensive surveillance program during these years and until 2015 (estimated non-detected cases/100.000 [95% credible interval] in 2000, 2009, and 2015 are 0.64 [0.5,0.8], 0.05 [0.01,0.14], and 0.19 [0.05,0.61], respectively).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8508286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85082862021-10-13 Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection Greiner, Matthias Selhorst, Thomas Balkema-Buschmann, Anne Johnson, Wesley O. Müller-Graf, Christine Conraths, Franz Josef Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Quantitative risk assessments for Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) necessitate estimates for key parameters such as the prevalence of infection, the probability of absence of infection in defined birth cohorts, and the numbers of BSE-infected, but non-detected cattle entering the food chain. We estimated three key parameters with adjustment for misclassification using the German BSE surveillance data using a Gompertz model for latent (i.e., unobserved) age-dependent detection probabilities and a Poisson response model for the number of BSE cases for birth cohorts 1999 to 2015. The models were combined in a Bayesian framework. We estimated the median true BSE prevalence between 3.74 and 0.216 cases per 100,000 animals for the birth cohorts 1990 to 2001 and observed a peak for the 1996 birth cohort with a point estimate of 16.41 cases per 100,000 cattle. For birth cohorts ranging from 2002 to 2013, the estimated median prevalence was below one case per 100,000 heads. The calculated confidence in freedom from disease (design prevalence 1 in 100,000) was above 99.5% for the birth cohorts 2002 to 2006. In conclusion, BSE surveillance in the healthy slaughtered cattle chain was extremely sensitive at the time, when BSE repeatedly occurred in Germany (2000–2009), because the entry of BSE-infected cattle into the food chain could virtually be prevented by the extensive surveillance program during these years and until 2015 (estimated non-detected cases/100.000 [95% credible interval] in 2000, 2009, and 2015 are 0.64 [0.5,0.8], 0.05 [0.01,0.14], and 0.19 [0.05,0.61], respectively). MDPI 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8508286/ /pubmed/34639268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199966 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Greiner, Matthias
Selhorst, Thomas
Balkema-Buschmann, Anne
Johnson, Wesley O.
Müller-Graf, Christine
Conraths, Franz Josef
Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title_full Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title_fullStr Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title_short Analysis of German BSE Surveillance Data: Estimation of the Prevalence of Confirmed Cases versus the Number of Infected, but Non-Detected, Cattle to Assess Confidence in Freedom from Infection
title_sort analysis of german bse surveillance data: estimation of the prevalence of confirmed cases versus the number of infected, but non-detected, cattle to assess confidence in freedom from infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199966
work_keys_str_mv AT greinermatthias analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection
AT selhorstthomas analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection
AT balkemabuschmannanne analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection
AT johnsonwesleyo analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection
AT mullergrafchristine analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection
AT conrathsfranzjosef analysisofgermanbsesurveillancedataestimationoftheprevalenceofconfirmedcasesversusthenumberofinfectedbutnondetectedcattletoassessconfidenceinfreedomfrominfection