Cargando…
Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions
Eyewitness evidence is often important in criminal cases, but false or misleading eyewitness evidence is known to be a leading cause of wrongful convictions. One explanation for mistakes that jurors are making when evaluating eyewitness evidence is their lack of accurate knowledge relating to false...
Autor principal: | Helm, Rebecca K. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13657127211031018 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Perceptions of Recanted Confessions
por: Ewanation, Logan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis
por: Eldridge, Heidi
Publicado: (2019) -
Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony
por: Salerno, Jessica M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A guide to forensic testimony: the art and practice of presenting testimony as an expert technical witness
por: Smith, Fred Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
The importance of the smallest effect size of interest in expert witness testimony on alcohol and memory
por: Otgaar, Henry, et al.
Publicado: (2022)