Cargando…

“Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease

For patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) lifestyle changes and disease management are key aspects of treatment that could be facilitated by mobile health applications (MHA). However, the quality and functions of MHA for CHD are largely unknown, since reviews are missing. Therefore, this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mack, Chiara, Terhorst, Yannik, Stephan, Mirjam, Baumeister, Harald, Stach, Michael, Messner, Eva-Maria, Bengel, Jürgen, Sander, Lasse B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910323
_version_ 1784582095551594496
author Mack, Chiara
Terhorst, Yannik
Stephan, Mirjam
Baumeister, Harald
Stach, Michael
Messner, Eva-Maria
Bengel, Jürgen
Sander, Lasse B.
author_facet Mack, Chiara
Terhorst, Yannik
Stephan, Mirjam
Baumeister, Harald
Stach, Michael
Messner, Eva-Maria
Bengel, Jürgen
Sander, Lasse B.
author_sort Mack, Chiara
collection PubMed
description For patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) lifestyle changes and disease management are key aspects of treatment that could be facilitated by mobile health applications (MHA). However, the quality and functions of MHA for CHD are largely unknown, since reviews are missing. Therefore, this study assessed the general characteristics, quality, and functions of MHA for CHD. Hereby, the Google Play and Apple App stores were systematically searched using a web crawler. The general characteristics and quality of MHA were rated with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) by two independent raters. From 3078 identified MHA, 38 met the pre-defined criteria and were included in the assessment. Most MHA were affiliated with commercial companies (52.63%) and lacked an evidence-base. An overall average quality of MHA (M = 3.38, SD = 0.36) was found with deficiencies in information quality and engagement. The most common functions were provision of information and CHD risk score calculators. Further functions included reminders (e.g., for medication or exercises), feedback, and health management support. Most MHA (81.58%) had one or two functions and MHA with more features had mostly higher MARS ratings. In summary, this review demonstrated that a number of potentially helpful MHA for patients with CHD are commercially available. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence documenting their usability and clinical potential. Since it is difficult for patients and healthcare providers to find suitable and high-quality MHA, databases with professionally reviewed MHA are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8508430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85084302021-10-13 “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease Mack, Chiara Terhorst, Yannik Stephan, Mirjam Baumeister, Harald Stach, Michael Messner, Eva-Maria Bengel, Jürgen Sander, Lasse B. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review For patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) lifestyle changes and disease management are key aspects of treatment that could be facilitated by mobile health applications (MHA). However, the quality and functions of MHA for CHD are largely unknown, since reviews are missing. Therefore, this study assessed the general characteristics, quality, and functions of MHA for CHD. Hereby, the Google Play and Apple App stores were systematically searched using a web crawler. The general characteristics and quality of MHA were rated with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) by two independent raters. From 3078 identified MHA, 38 met the pre-defined criteria and were included in the assessment. Most MHA were affiliated with commercial companies (52.63%) and lacked an evidence-base. An overall average quality of MHA (M = 3.38, SD = 0.36) was found with deficiencies in information quality and engagement. The most common functions were provision of information and CHD risk score calculators. Further functions included reminders (e.g., for medication or exercises), feedback, and health management support. Most MHA (81.58%) had one or two functions and MHA with more features had mostly higher MARS ratings. In summary, this review demonstrated that a number of potentially helpful MHA for patients with CHD are commercially available. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence documenting their usability and clinical potential. Since it is difficult for patients and healthcare providers to find suitable and high-quality MHA, databases with professionally reviewed MHA are required. MDPI 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8508430/ /pubmed/34639623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910323 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mack, Chiara
Terhorst, Yannik
Stephan, Mirjam
Baumeister, Harald
Stach, Michael
Messner, Eva-Maria
Bengel, Jürgen
Sander, Lasse B.
“Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title_full “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title_fullStr “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title_full_unstemmed “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title_short “Help in a Heartbeat?”: A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications (Apps) for Coronary Heart Disease
title_sort “help in a heartbeat?”: a systematic evaluation of mobile health applications (apps) for coronary heart disease
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910323
work_keys_str_mv AT mackchiara helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT terhorstyannik helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT stephanmirjam helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT baumeisterharald helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT stachmichael helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT messnerevamaria helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT bengeljurgen helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease
AT sanderlasseb helpinaheartbeatasystematicevaluationofmobilehealthapplicationsappsforcoronaryheartdisease