Cargando…
Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266 |
_version_ | 1784582183972765696 |
---|---|
author | Shao, Pei-Lin Liao, Jiunn-Der Wu, Shun-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsing Wong, Tak-Wah |
author_facet | Shao, Pei-Lin Liao, Jiunn-Der Wu, Shun-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsing Wong, Tak-Wah |
author_sort | Shao, Pei-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated whether nonthermal microplasma (MP) treatment can promote the healing of skin wounds in diabetic mice. Splint excision wounds were created on diabetic mice, and various wound healing parameters were compared among MP treatment, NPWT, and control groups. Quantitative analysis of the re-epithelialization percentage by detecting Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the extending epidermal tongue (EET) of the wound area and the epidermal proliferation index (EPI) was subsequently performed. Both treatments promoted wound healing by enhancing wound closure kinetics and wound bed blood flow; this was confirmed through histological analysis and optical coherence tomography. Both treatments also increased Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the EET of the wound area and the EPI to enhance re-epithelialization. Increased Smad2/3/4 mRNA expression was observed in the epidermis layer of wounds, particularly after MP treatment. The results suggest that the Smad-dependent transforming growth factor β signaling contributes to the enhancement of re-epithelialization after MP treatment with an appropriate exposure time. Overall, a short-term MP treatment (applied for 30 s twice a day) demonstrated comparable or better efficacy to conventional NPWT (applied for 4 h once a day) in promoting wound healing in diabetic mice. Thus, MP treatment exhibits promise for treating diabetic wounds clinically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8508803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85088032021-10-13 Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice Shao, Pei-Lin Liao, Jiunn-Der Wu, Shun-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsing Wong, Tak-Wah Int J Mol Sci Article The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated whether nonthermal microplasma (MP) treatment can promote the healing of skin wounds in diabetic mice. Splint excision wounds were created on diabetic mice, and various wound healing parameters were compared among MP treatment, NPWT, and control groups. Quantitative analysis of the re-epithelialization percentage by detecting Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the extending epidermal tongue (EET) of the wound area and the epidermal proliferation index (EPI) was subsequently performed. Both treatments promoted wound healing by enhancing wound closure kinetics and wound bed blood flow; this was confirmed through histological analysis and optical coherence tomography. Both treatments also increased Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the EET of the wound area and the EPI to enhance re-epithelialization. Increased Smad2/3/4 mRNA expression was observed in the epidermis layer of wounds, particularly after MP treatment. The results suggest that the Smad-dependent transforming growth factor β signaling contributes to the enhancement of re-epithelialization after MP treatment with an appropriate exposure time. Overall, a short-term MP treatment (applied for 30 s twice a day) demonstrated comparable or better efficacy to conventional NPWT (applied for 4 h once a day) in promoting wound healing in diabetic mice. Thus, MP treatment exhibits promise for treating diabetic wounds clinically. MDPI 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8508803/ /pubmed/34638608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shao, Pei-Lin Liao, Jiunn-Der Wu, Shun-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsing Wong, Tak-Wah Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title | Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title_full | Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title_fullStr | Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title_short | Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice |
title_sort | microplasma treatment versus negative pressure therapy for promoting wound healing in diabetic mice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaopeilin microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice AT liaojiunnder microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice AT wushuncheng microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice AT chenyuhsing microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice AT wongtakwah microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice |