Cargando…

Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice

The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Pei-Lin, Liao, Jiunn-Der, Wu, Shun-Cheng, Chen, Yu-Hsing, Wong, Tak-Wah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266
_version_ 1784582183972765696
author Shao, Pei-Lin
Liao, Jiunn-Der
Wu, Shun-Cheng
Chen, Yu-Hsing
Wong, Tak-Wah
author_facet Shao, Pei-Lin
Liao, Jiunn-Der
Wu, Shun-Cheng
Chen, Yu-Hsing
Wong, Tak-Wah
author_sort Shao, Pei-Lin
collection PubMed
description The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated whether nonthermal microplasma (MP) treatment can promote the healing of skin wounds in diabetic mice. Splint excision wounds were created on diabetic mice, and various wound healing parameters were compared among MP treatment, NPWT, and control groups. Quantitative analysis of the re-epithelialization percentage by detecting Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the extending epidermal tongue (EET) of the wound area and the epidermal proliferation index (EPI) was subsequently performed. Both treatments promoted wound healing by enhancing wound closure kinetics and wound bed blood flow; this was confirmed through histological analysis and optical coherence tomography. Both treatments also increased Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the EET of the wound area and the EPI to enhance re-epithelialization. Increased Smad2/3/4 mRNA expression was observed in the epidermis layer of wounds, particularly after MP treatment. The results suggest that the Smad-dependent transforming growth factor β signaling contributes to the enhancement of re-epithelialization after MP treatment with an appropriate exposure time. Overall, a short-term MP treatment (applied for 30 s twice a day) demonstrated comparable or better efficacy to conventional NPWT (applied for 4 h once a day) in promoting wound healing in diabetic mice. Thus, MP treatment exhibits promise for treating diabetic wounds clinically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8508803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85088032021-10-13 Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice Shao, Pei-Lin Liao, Jiunn-Der Wu, Shun-Cheng Chen, Yu-Hsing Wong, Tak-Wah Int J Mol Sci Article The delayed healing response of diabetic wounds is a major challenge for treatment. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to treat chronic wounds. However, it usually requires a long treatment time and results in directional growth of wound healing skin tissue. We investigated whether nonthermal microplasma (MP) treatment can promote the healing of skin wounds in diabetic mice. Splint excision wounds were created on diabetic mice, and various wound healing parameters were compared among MP treatment, NPWT, and control groups. Quantitative analysis of the re-epithelialization percentage by detecting Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the extending epidermal tongue (EET) of the wound area and the epidermal proliferation index (EPI) was subsequently performed. Both treatments promoted wound healing by enhancing wound closure kinetics and wound bed blood flow; this was confirmed through histological analysis and optical coherence tomography. Both treatments also increased Ki67 and DSG1 expression in the EET of the wound area and the EPI to enhance re-epithelialization. Increased Smad2/3/4 mRNA expression was observed in the epidermis layer of wounds, particularly after MP treatment. The results suggest that the Smad-dependent transforming growth factor β signaling contributes to the enhancement of re-epithelialization after MP treatment with an appropriate exposure time. Overall, a short-term MP treatment (applied for 30 s twice a day) demonstrated comparable or better efficacy to conventional NPWT (applied for 4 h once a day) in promoting wound healing in diabetic mice. Thus, MP treatment exhibits promise for treating diabetic wounds clinically. MDPI 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8508803/ /pubmed/34638608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shao, Pei-Lin
Liao, Jiunn-Der
Wu, Shun-Cheng
Chen, Yu-Hsing
Wong, Tak-Wah
Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title_full Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title_fullStr Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title_full_unstemmed Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title_short Microplasma Treatment versus Negative Pressure Therapy for Promoting Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice
title_sort microplasma treatment versus negative pressure therapy for promoting wound healing in diabetic mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910266
work_keys_str_mv AT shaopeilin microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice
AT liaojiunnder microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice
AT wushuncheng microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice
AT chenyuhsing microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice
AT wongtakwah microplasmatreatmentversusnegativepressuretherapyforpromotingwoundhealingindiabeticmice