Cargando…

Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, affecting more than 33 million people worldwide. Despite important advances in therapy, AF’s incidence remains high, and treatment often results in recurrence of the arrhythmia. A better understanding of the cellular and molecul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaplan, Aaron D., Joca, Humberto C., Boyman, Liron, Greiser, Maura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910513
_version_ 1784582192787095552
author Kaplan, Aaron D.
Joca, Humberto C.
Boyman, Liron
Greiser, Maura
author_facet Kaplan, Aaron D.
Joca, Humberto C.
Boyman, Liron
Greiser, Maura
author_sort Kaplan, Aaron D.
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, affecting more than 33 million people worldwide. Despite important advances in therapy, AF’s incidence remains high, and treatment often results in recurrence of the arrhythmia. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular changes that (1) trigger AF and (2) occur after the onset of AF will help to identify novel therapeutic targets. Over the past 20 years, a large body of research has shown that intracellular Ca(2+) handling is dramatically altered in AF. While some of these changes are arrhythmogenic, other changes counteract cellular arrhythmogenic mechanisms (Calcium Signaling Silencing). The intracellular Na(+) concentration ([Na(+)])(i) is a key regulator of intracellular Ca(2+) handling in cardiac myocytes. Despite its importance in the regulation of intracellular Ca(2+) handling, little is known about [Na(+)](i), its regulation, and how it might be changed in AF. Previous work suggests that there might be increases in the late component of the atrial Na(+) current (I(Na,L)) in AF, suggesting that [Na(+)](i) levels might be high in AF. Indeed, a pharmacological blockade of I(Na,L) has been suggested as a treatment for AF. Here, we review calcium signaling silencing and changes in intracellular Na(+) homeostasis during AF. We summarize the proposed arrhythmogenic mechanisms associated with increases in I(Na,L) during AF and discuss the evidence from clinical trials that have tested the pharmacological I(Na,L) blocker ranolazine in the treatment of AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8508839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85088392021-10-13 Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis Kaplan, Aaron D. Joca, Humberto C. Boyman, Liron Greiser, Maura Int J Mol Sci Review Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, affecting more than 33 million people worldwide. Despite important advances in therapy, AF’s incidence remains high, and treatment often results in recurrence of the arrhythmia. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular changes that (1) trigger AF and (2) occur after the onset of AF will help to identify novel therapeutic targets. Over the past 20 years, a large body of research has shown that intracellular Ca(2+) handling is dramatically altered in AF. While some of these changes are arrhythmogenic, other changes counteract cellular arrhythmogenic mechanisms (Calcium Signaling Silencing). The intracellular Na(+) concentration ([Na(+)])(i) is a key regulator of intracellular Ca(2+) handling in cardiac myocytes. Despite its importance in the regulation of intracellular Ca(2+) handling, little is known about [Na(+)](i), its regulation, and how it might be changed in AF. Previous work suggests that there might be increases in the late component of the atrial Na(+) current (I(Na,L)) in AF, suggesting that [Na(+)](i) levels might be high in AF. Indeed, a pharmacological blockade of I(Na,L) has been suggested as a treatment for AF. Here, we review calcium signaling silencing and changes in intracellular Na(+) homeostasis during AF. We summarize the proposed arrhythmogenic mechanisms associated with increases in I(Na,L) during AF and discuss the evidence from clinical trials that have tested the pharmacological I(Na,L) blocker ranolazine in the treatment of AF. MDPI 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8508839/ /pubmed/34638854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910513 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kaplan, Aaron D.
Joca, Humberto C.
Boyman, Liron
Greiser, Maura
Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title_full Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title_fullStr Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title_full_unstemmed Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title_short Calcium Signaling Silencing in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Atrial Sodium Homeostasis
title_sort calcium signaling silencing in atrial fibrillation: implications for atrial sodium homeostasis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8508839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34638854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910513
work_keys_str_mv AT kaplanaarond calciumsignalingsilencinginatrialfibrillationimplicationsforatrialsodiumhomeostasis
AT jocahumbertoc calciumsignalingsilencinginatrialfibrillationimplicationsforatrialsodiumhomeostasis
AT boymanliron calciumsignalingsilencinginatrialfibrillationimplicationsforatrialsodiumhomeostasis
AT greisermaura calciumsignalingsilencinginatrialfibrillationimplicationsforatrialsodiumhomeostasis