Cargando…
Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616 |
_version_ | 1784582292622016512 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yu Ji Lee, Gil Ho Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Soon Sun Lim, Sun Gyo Kim, Jin Hong |
author_facet | Li, Yu Ji Lee, Gil Ho Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Soon Sun Lim, Sun Gyo Kim, Jin Hong |
author_sort | Li, Yu Ji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 PCLs from 92 patients who underwent US immediately prior to EUS between January 2014 and May 2017. The intermodality reliability and agreement of the PCL morphologic findings of the two techniques were analyzed and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ values. The success rates of US for delineating PCLs in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas were 77.8%, 91.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for US and the corresponding EUS lesion size showed very good reliability (0.978; p < 0.001). The κ value between modalities was 0.882 for pancreatic duct dilation, indicating good agreement. The κ values for solid components and cystic wall and septal thickening were 0.481 and 0.395, respectively, indicating moderate agreement. US may be useful for monitoring PCL growth and changes in pancreatic duct dilation, but it has limited use in the diagnosis and surveillance of mural nodules or cystic wall thickness changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8509250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85092502021-10-13 Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography Li, Yu Ji Lee, Gil Ho Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Soon Sun Lim, Sun Gyo Kim, Jin Hong J Clin Med Article Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 PCLs from 92 patients who underwent US immediately prior to EUS between January 2014 and May 2017. The intermodality reliability and agreement of the PCL morphologic findings of the two techniques were analyzed and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ values. The success rates of US for delineating PCLs in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas were 77.8%, 91.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for US and the corresponding EUS lesion size showed very good reliability (0.978; p < 0.001). The κ value between modalities was 0.882 for pancreatic duct dilation, indicating good agreement. The κ values for solid components and cystic wall and septal thickening were 0.481 and 0.395, respectively, indicating moderate agreement. US may be useful for monitoring PCL growth and changes in pancreatic duct dilation, but it has limited use in the diagnosis and surveillance of mural nodules or cystic wall thickness changes. MDPI 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8509250/ /pubmed/34640634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yu Ji Lee, Gil Ho Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Soon Sun Lim, Sun Gyo Kim, Jin Hong Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title | Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title_full | Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title_short | Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography |
title_sort | diagnostic yield of transabdominal ultrasonography for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions compared with endoscopic ultrasonography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyuji diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT leegilho diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT yangminjae diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT hwangjaechul diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT yoobyungmoo diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT kimsoonsun diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT limsungyo diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography AT kimjinhong diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography |