Cargando…

Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yu Ji, Lee, Gil Ho, Yang, Min Jae, Hwang, Jae Chul, Yoo, Byung Moo, Kim, Soon Sun, Lim, Sun Gyo, Kim, Jin Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616
_version_ 1784582292622016512
author Li, Yu Ji
Lee, Gil Ho
Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Soon Sun
Lim, Sun Gyo
Kim, Jin Hong
author_facet Li, Yu Ji
Lee, Gil Ho
Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Soon Sun
Lim, Sun Gyo
Kim, Jin Hong
author_sort Li, Yu Ji
collection PubMed
description Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 PCLs from 92 patients who underwent US immediately prior to EUS between January 2014 and May 2017. The intermodality reliability and agreement of the PCL morphologic findings of the two techniques were analyzed and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ values. The success rates of US for delineating PCLs in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas were 77.8%, 91.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for US and the corresponding EUS lesion size showed very good reliability (0.978; p < 0.001). The κ value between modalities was 0.882 for pancreatic duct dilation, indicating good agreement. The κ values for solid components and cystic wall and septal thickening were 0.481 and 0.395, respectively, indicating moderate agreement. US may be useful for monitoring PCL growth and changes in pancreatic duct dilation, but it has limited use in the diagnosis and surveillance of mural nodules or cystic wall thickness changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8509250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85092502021-10-13 Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography Li, Yu Ji Lee, Gil Ho Yang, Min Jae Hwang, Jae Chul Yoo, Byung Moo Kim, Soon Sun Lim, Sun Gyo Kim, Jin Hong J Clin Med Article Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 PCLs from 92 patients who underwent US immediately prior to EUS between January 2014 and May 2017. The intermodality reliability and agreement of the PCL morphologic findings of the two techniques were analyzed and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ values. The success rates of US for delineating PCLs in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas were 77.8%, 91.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for US and the corresponding EUS lesion size showed very good reliability (0.978; p < 0.001). The κ value between modalities was 0.882 for pancreatic duct dilation, indicating good agreement. The κ values for solid components and cystic wall and septal thickening were 0.481 and 0.395, respectively, indicating moderate agreement. US may be useful for monitoring PCL growth and changes in pancreatic duct dilation, but it has limited use in the diagnosis and surveillance of mural nodules or cystic wall thickness changes. MDPI 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8509250/ /pubmed/34640634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yu Ji
Lee, Gil Ho
Yang, Min Jae
Hwang, Jae Chul
Yoo, Byung Moo
Kim, Soon Sun
Lim, Sun Gyo
Kim, Jin Hong
Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_full Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_short Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography
title_sort diagnostic yield of transabdominal ultrasonography for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions compared with endoscopic ultrasonography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194616
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuji diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT leegilho diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT yangminjae diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT hwangjaechul diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT yoobyungmoo diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT kimsoonsun diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT limsungyo diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography
AT kimjinhong diagnosticyieldoftransabdominalultrasonographyforevaluationofpancreaticcysticlesionscomparedwithendoscopicultrasonography