Cargando…

Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review

Irvine–Gass syndrome (IGS) remains one of the most common complications following uneventful cataract surgery. In most cases, macular edema (ME) in IGS is benign, self-limiting, and resolves spontaneously without visual impairment; however, persistent edema and refractory cases may occur and potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orski, Michał, Gawęcki, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194375
_version_ 1784582355473661952
author Orski, Michał
Gawęcki, Maciej
author_facet Orski, Michał
Gawęcki, Maciej
author_sort Orski, Michał
collection PubMed
description Irvine–Gass syndrome (IGS) remains one of the most common complications following uneventful cataract surgery. In most cases, macular edema (ME) in IGS is benign, self-limiting, and resolves spontaneously without visual impairment; however, persistent edema and refractory cases may occur and potentially deteriorate visual function. Despite the relatively high prevalence of IGS, no solid management guidelines exist. We searched the PUBMED database for randomized clinical trials (RCT) or case series of at least 10 cases published since 2000 evaluating different treatment strategies in patients with cystoid macular edema (CME). The search revealed 28 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria with only seven RCTs. The scarceness of material makes it impossible to formulate strong recommendations for the treatment of IGS. Clinical practice and theoretical background support topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the first-line therapy. Invasive procedures, such as periocular steroids, intravitreal corticosteroids, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), are usually applied in prolonged or refractory cases. Results of novel applications of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) are also promising and should be studied carefully in terms of the safety profile and cost effectiveness. Early initiation of invasive treatment for providing better functional results must be examined in further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8509495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85094952021-10-13 Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review Orski, Michał Gawęcki, Maciej J Clin Med Review Irvine–Gass syndrome (IGS) remains one of the most common complications following uneventful cataract surgery. In most cases, macular edema (ME) in IGS is benign, self-limiting, and resolves spontaneously without visual impairment; however, persistent edema and refractory cases may occur and potentially deteriorate visual function. Despite the relatively high prevalence of IGS, no solid management guidelines exist. We searched the PUBMED database for randomized clinical trials (RCT) or case series of at least 10 cases published since 2000 evaluating different treatment strategies in patients with cystoid macular edema (CME). The search revealed 28 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria with only seven RCTs. The scarceness of material makes it impossible to formulate strong recommendations for the treatment of IGS. Clinical practice and theoretical background support topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the first-line therapy. Invasive procedures, such as periocular steroids, intravitreal corticosteroids, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), are usually applied in prolonged or refractory cases. Results of novel applications of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) are also promising and should be studied carefully in terms of the safety profile and cost effectiveness. Early initiation of invasive treatment for providing better functional results must be examined in further research. MDPI 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8509495/ /pubmed/34640393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194375 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Orski, Michał
Gawęcki, Maciej
Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title_full Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title_fullStr Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title_short Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
title_sort current management options in irvine–gass syndrome: a systemized review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194375
work_keys_str_mv AT orskimichał currentmanagementoptionsinirvinegasssyndromeasystemizedreview
AT gaweckimaciej currentmanagementoptionsinirvinegasssyndromeasystemizedreview