Cargando…
Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a commonly performed salvage procedure for failed proximal humeral fracture fixation. The rate of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures is higher compared to primary RSA. The goal of this study was to investigate the biomechanical value of a protective cercla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194600 |
_version_ | 1784582360420843520 |
---|---|
author | Michel, Philipp A. Katthagen, J. Christoph Schliemann, Benedikt Wilkens, Sina Frank, Andre Heilmann, Lukas F. Dyrna, Felix Raschke, Michael J. |
author_facet | Michel, Philipp A. Katthagen, J. Christoph Schliemann, Benedikt Wilkens, Sina Frank, Andre Heilmann, Lukas F. Dyrna, Felix Raschke, Michael J. |
author_sort | Michel, Philipp A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a commonly performed salvage procedure for failed proximal humeral fracture fixation. The rate of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures is higher compared to primary RSA. The goal of this study was to investigate the biomechanical value of a protective cerclage during stem impaction in a revision surgery setting. Twenty-eight fresh-frozen human humeri were used to assess different configurations for steel wire and FiberTape cerclages. A custom-built biomechanical test setup simulated the mallet strikes during the stem impaction process with the Univers Revers prothesis stem. The mallet energy until the occurrence of a first crack was not different between groups. The total energy until progression of the fracture distally to the cerclage was significantly higher in the cerclage groups compared to the native humerus (9.5 J vs. 3.5 J, respectively; p = 0.0125). There was no difference between the steel wire and FiberTape groups (11.4 J vs. 8.6 J, respectively; p = 0.2695). All fractures were located at the concave side of the stem at the metaphyseal calcar region. This study demonstrates that a protective cerclage can successfully delay the occurrence of a fracture during stem impaction in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A FiberTape cerclage is biomechanically equally efficient compared to a steel wire cerclage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8509515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85095152021-10-13 Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Michel, Philipp A. Katthagen, J. Christoph Schliemann, Benedikt Wilkens, Sina Frank, Andre Heilmann, Lukas F. Dyrna, Felix Raschke, Michael J. J Clin Med Article Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a commonly performed salvage procedure for failed proximal humeral fracture fixation. The rate of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures is higher compared to primary RSA. The goal of this study was to investigate the biomechanical value of a protective cerclage during stem impaction in a revision surgery setting. Twenty-eight fresh-frozen human humeri were used to assess different configurations for steel wire and FiberTape cerclages. A custom-built biomechanical test setup simulated the mallet strikes during the stem impaction process with the Univers Revers prothesis stem. The mallet energy until the occurrence of a first crack was not different between groups. The total energy until progression of the fracture distally to the cerclage was significantly higher in the cerclage groups compared to the native humerus (9.5 J vs. 3.5 J, respectively; p = 0.0125). There was no difference between the steel wire and FiberTape groups (11.4 J vs. 8.6 J, respectively; p = 0.2695). All fractures were located at the concave side of the stem at the metaphyseal calcar region. This study demonstrates that a protective cerclage can successfully delay the occurrence of a fracture during stem impaction in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A FiberTape cerclage is biomechanically equally efficient compared to a steel wire cerclage. MDPI 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8509515/ /pubmed/34640617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194600 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Michel, Philipp A. Katthagen, J. Christoph Schliemann, Benedikt Wilkens, Sina Frank, Andre Heilmann, Lukas F. Dyrna, Felix Raschke, Michael J. Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title | Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full | Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_short | Biomechanical Value of a Protective Proximal Humeral Cerclage in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_sort | biomechanical value of a protective proximal humeral cerclage in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michelphilippa biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT katthagenjchristoph biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT schliemannbenedikt biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT wilkenssina biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT frankandre biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT heilmannlukasf biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT dyrnafelix biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT raschkemichaelj biomechanicalvalueofaprotectiveproximalhumeralcerclageinreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty |