Cargando…
Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a min...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312 |
_version_ | 1784582363078983680 |
---|---|
author | Wirtz, Michel Claeys, Wietse Francois, Philippe Waterloos, Marjan Waterschoot, Mieke Lumen, Nicolaas |
author_facet | Wirtz, Michel Claeys, Wietse Francois, Philippe Waterloos, Marjan Waterschoot, Mieke Lumen, Nicolaas |
author_sort | Wirtz, Michel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a minimum of 12 months was necessary for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were stricture extension into the penile urethra, concomitant stricture at another location, flap urethroplasty for a meatal stricture, dorsal inlay urethroplasty with another type of graft, ventral onlay graft urethroplasty or staged urethroplasty. Recurrence was defined by the inability to pass a 14F metal sound through the reconstructed meatus irrespective of patients’ complaints. Results: Our study cohort included 40 patients. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was used in 25 patients and 15 patients were treated with the aid of lingual mucosal graft (LMG). The median follow-up was 85 (IQR: 69–110) months. Seven (17.5%) patients suffered a stricture recurrence of which four (10%) needed re-intervention. The median 5-y recurrent free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 85 (±6)%. The median 5-y RFS was 96 (±4)% versus 65 (±13)% for respectively BMG and LMG (p = 0.03). Post-operative complications were identified in 11 (27.5%) patients with only one (2.5%) patient who had a grade 3a complication. Conclusions: Dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique for selected patients with meatal stenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8509526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85095262021-10-13 Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience Wirtz, Michel Claeys, Wietse Francois, Philippe Waterloos, Marjan Waterschoot, Mieke Lumen, Nicolaas J Clin Med Article Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a minimum of 12 months was necessary for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were stricture extension into the penile urethra, concomitant stricture at another location, flap urethroplasty for a meatal stricture, dorsal inlay urethroplasty with another type of graft, ventral onlay graft urethroplasty or staged urethroplasty. Recurrence was defined by the inability to pass a 14F metal sound through the reconstructed meatus irrespective of patients’ complaints. Results: Our study cohort included 40 patients. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was used in 25 patients and 15 patients were treated with the aid of lingual mucosal graft (LMG). The median follow-up was 85 (IQR: 69–110) months. Seven (17.5%) patients suffered a stricture recurrence of which four (10%) needed re-intervention. The median 5-y recurrent free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 85 (±6)%. The median 5-y RFS was 96 (±4)% versus 65 (±13)% for respectively BMG and LMG (p = 0.03). Post-operative complications were identified in 11 (27.5%) patients with only one (2.5%) patient who had a grade 3a complication. Conclusions: Dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique for selected patients with meatal stenosis. MDPI 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8509526/ /pubmed/34640331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wirtz, Michel Claeys, Wietse Francois, Philippe Waterloos, Marjan Waterschoot, Mieke Lumen, Nicolaas Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | treatment of meatal strictures by dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: a single-center experience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wirtzmichel treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience AT claeyswietse treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience AT francoisphilippe treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience AT waterloosmarjan treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience AT waterschootmieke treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience AT lumennicolaas treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience |