Cargando…

Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience

Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirtz, Michel, Claeys, Wietse, Francois, Philippe, Waterloos, Marjan, Waterschoot, Mieke, Lumen, Nicolaas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312
_version_ 1784582363078983680
author Wirtz, Michel
Claeys, Wietse
Francois, Philippe
Waterloos, Marjan
Waterschoot, Mieke
Lumen, Nicolaas
author_facet Wirtz, Michel
Claeys, Wietse
Francois, Philippe
Waterloos, Marjan
Waterschoot, Mieke
Lumen, Nicolaas
author_sort Wirtz, Michel
collection PubMed
description Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a minimum of 12 months was necessary for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were stricture extension into the penile urethra, concomitant stricture at another location, flap urethroplasty for a meatal stricture, dorsal inlay urethroplasty with another type of graft, ventral onlay graft urethroplasty or staged urethroplasty. Recurrence was defined by the inability to pass a 14F metal sound through the reconstructed meatus irrespective of patients’ complaints. Results: Our study cohort included 40 patients. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was used in 25 patients and 15 patients were treated with the aid of lingual mucosal graft (LMG). The median follow-up was 85 (IQR: 69–110) months. Seven (17.5%) patients suffered a stricture recurrence of which four (10%) needed re-intervention. The median 5-y recurrent free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 85 (±6)%. The median 5-y RFS was 96 (±4)% versus 65 (±13)% for respectively BMG and LMG (p = 0.03). Post-operative complications were identified in 11 (27.5%) patients with only one (2.5%) patient who had a grade 3a complication. Conclusions: Dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique for selected patients with meatal stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8509526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85095262021-10-13 Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience Wirtz, Michel Claeys, Wietse Francois, Philippe Waterloos, Marjan Waterschoot, Mieke Lumen, Nicolaas J Clin Med Article Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a minimum of 12 months was necessary for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were stricture extension into the penile urethra, concomitant stricture at another location, flap urethroplasty for a meatal stricture, dorsal inlay urethroplasty with another type of graft, ventral onlay graft urethroplasty or staged urethroplasty. Recurrence was defined by the inability to pass a 14F metal sound through the reconstructed meatus irrespective of patients’ complaints. Results: Our study cohort included 40 patients. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was used in 25 patients and 15 patients were treated with the aid of lingual mucosal graft (LMG). The median follow-up was 85 (IQR: 69–110) months. Seven (17.5%) patients suffered a stricture recurrence of which four (10%) needed re-intervention. The median 5-y recurrent free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 85 (±6)%. The median 5-y RFS was 96 (±4)% versus 65 (±13)% for respectively BMG and LMG (p = 0.03). Post-operative complications were identified in 11 (27.5%) patients with only one (2.5%) patient who had a grade 3a complication. Conclusions: Dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique for selected patients with meatal stenosis. MDPI 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8509526/ /pubmed/34640331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wirtz, Michel
Claeys, Wietse
Francois, Philippe
Waterloos, Marjan
Waterschoot, Mieke
Lumen, Nicolaas
Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort treatment of meatal strictures by dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: a single-center experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640331
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194312
work_keys_str_mv AT wirtzmichel treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience
AT claeyswietse treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience
AT francoisphilippe treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience
AT waterloosmarjan treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience
AT waterschootmieke treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience
AT lumennicolaas treatmentofmeatalstricturesbydorsalinlayoralmucosagrafturethroplastyasinglecenterexperience