Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper

INTRODUCTION: Accumulation of secretions in an endotracheal tube can increase the resistance to flow resulting in an increased patient work of breathing when the patient is interacting with the ventilator. Retained secretions can also serve as an infection risk. Standard suction catheters are limite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, John D., Huang, Yuh Chin, MacIntyre, Neil R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34734112
http://dx.doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-026
_version_ 1784582376710471680
author Davies, John D.
Huang, Yuh Chin
MacIntyre, Neil R.
author_facet Davies, John D.
Huang, Yuh Chin
MacIntyre, Neil R.
author_sort Davies, John D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accumulation of secretions in an endotracheal tube can increase the resistance to flow resulting in an increased patient work of breathing when the patient is interacting with the ventilator. Retained secretions can also serve as an infection risk. Standard suction catheters are limited in their ability to keep the lumen of the endotracheal tube clear. A novel closed-suction catheter has been introduced that incorporates a balloon at its distal end that, when inflated, physically scrapes secretions out of the endotracheal tube (CleanSweep catheter (CSC), Teleflex, Morrisville NC). We hypothesized that the CSC would be more efficient at removing secretions from inside the endotracheal tube than a standard suction catheter (SSC). METHODS: We performed a bench study examining resistive pressures across different sizes of endotracheal tubes when cleaned by the CSC as compared with an SSC. This study was followed by a prospective crossover study again comparing the CSC with an SSC in intubated intensive care unit patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring frequent suctioning. RESULTS: For the bench study the CSC was significantly better in reducing airway resistive pressures (P < 0.001). In the prospective crossover study the CSC over 2 h also removed significantly more secretions than the SSC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both our bench and crossover clinical study demonstrated improved clearance of secretions with the CSC vs an SSC. Further research is needed to ascertain the clinical outcome benefits of enhanced secretion removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8509580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85095802021-11-02 Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper Davies, John D. Huang, Yuh Chin MacIntyre, Neil R. Can J Respir Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: Accumulation of secretions in an endotracheal tube can increase the resistance to flow resulting in an increased patient work of breathing when the patient is interacting with the ventilator. Retained secretions can also serve as an infection risk. Standard suction catheters are limited in their ability to keep the lumen of the endotracheal tube clear. A novel closed-suction catheter has been introduced that incorporates a balloon at its distal end that, when inflated, physically scrapes secretions out of the endotracheal tube (CleanSweep catheter (CSC), Teleflex, Morrisville NC). We hypothesized that the CSC would be more efficient at removing secretions from inside the endotracheal tube than a standard suction catheter (SSC). METHODS: We performed a bench study examining resistive pressures across different sizes of endotracheal tubes when cleaned by the CSC as compared with an SSC. This study was followed by a prospective crossover study again comparing the CSC with an SSC in intubated intensive care unit patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring frequent suctioning. RESULTS: For the bench study the CSC was significantly better in reducing airway resistive pressures (P < 0.001). In the prospective crossover study the CSC over 2 h also removed significantly more secretions than the SSC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both our bench and crossover clinical study demonstrated improved clearance of secretions with the CSC vs an SSC. Further research is needed to ascertain the clinical outcome benefits of enhanced secretion removal. Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8509580/ /pubmed/34734112 http://dx.doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-026 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact editor@csrt.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, John D.
Huang, Yuh Chin
MacIntyre, Neil R.
Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title_full Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title_short Evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
title_sort evaluation of a novel endotracheal tube suctioning system incorporating an inflatable sweeper
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34734112
http://dx.doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2021-026
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesjohnd evaluationofanovelendotrachealtubesuctioningsystemincorporatinganinflatablesweeper
AT huangyuhchin evaluationofanovelendotrachealtubesuctioningsystemincorporatinganinflatablesweeper
AT macintyreneilr evaluationofanovelendotrachealtubesuctioningsystemincorporatinganinflatablesweeper