Cargando…

Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter

Aims: We aimed to prospectively investigate the effectiveness of a standardized follow-up for AF-detection after common atrial flutter (cAFL) ablation. Methods: A total of 309 patients after cAFL ablation without known AF, from 5 centers, and at least one completed, standardized follow-up at 3, 6 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krisai, Philipp, Roten, Laurent, Zeljkovic, Ivan, Pavlovic, Nikola, Ammann, Peter, Reichlin, Tobias, Auf der Maur, Eric, Streicher, Olivia, Knecht, Sven, Kühne, Michael, Osswald, Stefan, Novak, Jan, Sticherling, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194453
_version_ 1784582431540510720
author Krisai, Philipp
Roten, Laurent
Zeljkovic, Ivan
Pavlovic, Nikola
Ammann, Peter
Reichlin, Tobias
Auf der Maur, Eric
Streicher, Olivia
Knecht, Sven
Kühne, Michael
Osswald, Stefan
Novak, Jan
Sticherling, Christian
author_facet Krisai, Philipp
Roten, Laurent
Zeljkovic, Ivan
Pavlovic, Nikola
Ammann, Peter
Reichlin, Tobias
Auf der Maur, Eric
Streicher, Olivia
Knecht, Sven
Kühne, Michael
Osswald, Stefan
Novak, Jan
Sticherling, Christian
author_sort Krisai, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Aims: We aimed to prospectively investigate the effectiveness of a standardized follow-up for AF-detection after common atrial flutter (cAFL) ablation. Methods: A total of 309 patients after cAFL ablation without known AF, from 5 centers, and at least one completed, standardized follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months, including a 24 h Holter-electrocardiogram (ECG), were included. The primary outcome was incident atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial tachycardia (AT). Predictors were investigated by Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: The mean age was 67.9 years; 15.2% were female and the mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke, Vascular disease, Sex category) score was 2.4 points. The great majority of patients (90.3%) were anticoagulated. Over a mean follow-up of 12.2 months with a standardized approach, AF/AT was detected in 73 patients, corresponding to 11.7% at 3 months, 18.4% at 6 months and 28.2% at 12 months of follow-up. AF was found in 64 patients, AT in 9 and both in 2 patients. Occurrence of AF was recorded in 40 (60.6%) patients by Holter-ECG and in the remaining 26 (39.4%) by clinical follow-up only. There was no difference in male versus female (p = 0.08), or in younger versus older patients (p = 0.96) for AF/AT detection. Only coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals] 1.03 [1.01–1.05], p = 0.01) was associated with the primary outcome. Conclusions: AF or AT was detected in a large proportion of cAFL patients after cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) ablation, using a standardized follow-up over 1 year. This standardized screening can be easily implemented with high patient acceptance. The high proportion of post-ablation AF needs to be taken into consideration when deciding on long-term oral anticoagulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8509798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85097982021-10-13 Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter Krisai, Philipp Roten, Laurent Zeljkovic, Ivan Pavlovic, Nikola Ammann, Peter Reichlin, Tobias Auf der Maur, Eric Streicher, Olivia Knecht, Sven Kühne, Michael Osswald, Stefan Novak, Jan Sticherling, Christian J Clin Med Article Aims: We aimed to prospectively investigate the effectiveness of a standardized follow-up for AF-detection after common atrial flutter (cAFL) ablation. Methods: A total of 309 patients after cAFL ablation without known AF, from 5 centers, and at least one completed, standardized follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months, including a 24 h Holter-electrocardiogram (ECG), were included. The primary outcome was incident atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial tachycardia (AT). Predictors were investigated by Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: The mean age was 67.9 years; 15.2% were female and the mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke, Vascular disease, Sex category) score was 2.4 points. The great majority of patients (90.3%) were anticoagulated. Over a mean follow-up of 12.2 months with a standardized approach, AF/AT was detected in 73 patients, corresponding to 11.7% at 3 months, 18.4% at 6 months and 28.2% at 12 months of follow-up. AF was found in 64 patients, AT in 9 and both in 2 patients. Occurrence of AF was recorded in 40 (60.6%) patients by Holter-ECG and in the remaining 26 (39.4%) by clinical follow-up only. There was no difference in male versus female (p = 0.08), or in younger versus older patients (p = 0.96) for AF/AT detection. Only coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals] 1.03 [1.01–1.05], p = 0.01) was associated with the primary outcome. Conclusions: AF or AT was detected in a large proportion of cAFL patients after cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) ablation, using a standardized follow-up over 1 year. This standardized screening can be easily implemented with high patient acceptance. The high proportion of post-ablation AF needs to be taken into consideration when deciding on long-term oral anticoagulation. MDPI 2021-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8509798/ /pubmed/34640470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194453 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Krisai, Philipp
Roten, Laurent
Zeljkovic, Ivan
Pavlovic, Nikola
Ammann, Peter
Reichlin, Tobias
Auf der Maur, Eric
Streicher, Olivia
Knecht, Sven
Kühne, Michael
Osswald, Stefan
Novak, Jan
Sticherling, Christian
Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title_full Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title_fullStr Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title_short Prospective Evaluation of a Standardized Screening for Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
title_sort prospective evaluation of a standardized screening for atrial fibrillation after ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8509798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640470
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194453
work_keys_str_mv AT krisaiphilipp prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT rotenlaurent prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT zeljkovicivan prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT pavlovicnikola prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT ammannpeter prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT reichlintobias prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT aufdermaureric prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT streicherolivia prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT knechtsven prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT kuhnemichael prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT osswaldstefan prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT novakjan prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter
AT sticherlingchristian prospectiveevaluationofastandardizedscreeningforatrialfibrillationafterablationofcavotricuspidisthmusdependentatrialflutter