Cargando…

Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients

OBJECTIVE: Patients with labor and sex trafficking experiences seek healthcare while and after being trafficked. Their trafficking experiences are often unrecognized by clinicians who lack a validated tool to systematically screen for trafficking. We aimed to derive and validate a brief, comprehensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chisolm‐Straker, Makini, Singer, Elizabeth, Strong, David, Loo, George T., Rothman, Emily F., Clesca, Cindy, d'Etienne, James, Alanis, Naomi, Richardson, Lynne D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12558
_version_ 1784582504619966464
author Chisolm‐Straker, Makini
Singer, Elizabeth
Strong, David
Loo, George T.
Rothman, Emily F.
Clesca, Cindy
d'Etienne, James
Alanis, Naomi
Richardson, Lynne D.
author_facet Chisolm‐Straker, Makini
Singer, Elizabeth
Strong, David
Loo, George T.
Rothman, Emily F.
Clesca, Cindy
d'Etienne, James
Alanis, Naomi
Richardson, Lynne D.
author_sort Chisolm‐Straker, Makini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients with labor and sex trafficking experiences seek healthcare while and after being trafficked. Their trafficking experiences are often unrecognized by clinicians who lack a validated tool to systematically screen for trafficking. We aimed to derive and validate a brief, comprehensive trafficking screening tool for use in healthcare settings. METHODS: Patients were randomly selected to participate in this prospective study based on time of arrival. Data collectors administered 5 dichotomous index questions and a reference standard trafficking assessment tool that requires 30 to 60 minutes to administer. Data collection was from June 2016 to January 2021. Data from patients in 5 New York City (NYC) emergency departments (EDs) were used for tool psychometric derivation, and data from patients in a Fort Worth ED were used for external validation. Clinically stable ED adults (aged ≥18 years) were eligible to participate. Candidate questions were selected from the Trafficking Victim Identification Tool (TVIT). The study outcome measurement was a determination of a participant having a lifetime experience of labor and/or sex trafficking based on the interpretation of the reference standard interview, the TVIT. RESULTS: Overall, 4127 ED patients were enrolled. In the derivation group, the reference standard identified 36 (1.1%) as positive for a labor and/or sex trafficking experience. In the validation group, 12 (1.4%) were positive by the reference standard. Rapid Appraisal for Trafficking (RAFT) is a new 4‐item trafficking screening tool: in the derivation group, RAFT was 89% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%–99%) and 74% specific (95% CI, 73%–76%) and in the external validation group, RAFT was 100% sensitive (95% CI, 100%–100%) and 61% specific (95% CI, 56%–65%). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid, 4‐item RAFT screening tool demonstrated good sensitivity compared with the existing, resource‐intensive reference standard tool. RAFT may enhance the detection of human trafficking in EDs. Additional multicenter studies and research on RAFT's implementation are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85101412021-10-18 Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients Chisolm‐Straker, Makini Singer, Elizabeth Strong, David Loo, George T. Rothman, Emily F. Clesca, Cindy d'Etienne, James Alanis, Naomi Richardson, Lynne D. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Injury Prevention OBJECTIVE: Patients with labor and sex trafficking experiences seek healthcare while and after being trafficked. Their trafficking experiences are often unrecognized by clinicians who lack a validated tool to systematically screen for trafficking. We aimed to derive and validate a brief, comprehensive trafficking screening tool for use in healthcare settings. METHODS: Patients were randomly selected to participate in this prospective study based on time of arrival. Data collectors administered 5 dichotomous index questions and a reference standard trafficking assessment tool that requires 30 to 60 minutes to administer. Data collection was from June 2016 to January 2021. Data from patients in 5 New York City (NYC) emergency departments (EDs) were used for tool psychometric derivation, and data from patients in a Fort Worth ED were used for external validation. Clinically stable ED adults (aged ≥18 years) were eligible to participate. Candidate questions were selected from the Trafficking Victim Identification Tool (TVIT). The study outcome measurement was a determination of a participant having a lifetime experience of labor and/or sex trafficking based on the interpretation of the reference standard interview, the TVIT. RESULTS: Overall, 4127 ED patients were enrolled. In the derivation group, the reference standard identified 36 (1.1%) as positive for a labor and/or sex trafficking experience. In the validation group, 12 (1.4%) were positive by the reference standard. Rapid Appraisal for Trafficking (RAFT) is a new 4‐item trafficking screening tool: in the derivation group, RAFT was 89% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%–99%) and 74% specific (95% CI, 73%–76%) and in the external validation group, RAFT was 100% sensitive (95% CI, 100%–100%) and 61% specific (95% CI, 56%–65%). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid, 4‐item RAFT screening tool demonstrated good sensitivity compared with the existing, resource‐intensive reference standard tool. RAFT may enhance the detection of human trafficking in EDs. Additional multicenter studies and research on RAFT's implementation are needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8510141/ /pubmed/34667976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12558 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Injury Prevention
Chisolm‐Straker, Makini
Singer, Elizabeth
Strong, David
Loo, George T.
Rothman, Emily F.
Clesca, Cindy
d'Etienne, James
Alanis, Naomi
Richardson, Lynne D.
Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title_full Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title_fullStr Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title_short Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
title_sort validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
topic Injury Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12558
work_keys_str_mv AT chisolmstrakermakini validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT singerelizabeth validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT strongdavid validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT loogeorget validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT rothmanemilyf validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT clescacindy validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT detiennejames validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT alanisnaomi validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients
AT richardsonlynned validationofascreeningtoolforlaborandsextraffickingamongemergencydepartmentpatients