Cargando…

Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a popular method of particle size measurement, but at ultra-low particle concentrations, the occurrence of number concentration fluctuations limits the use of the technique. Number fluctuations add a non-Gaussian term to the scattered light intensity autocorrelation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Mengjie, Shen, Jin, Thomas, John C., Mu, Tongtong, Liu, Wei, Wang, Yajing, Pan, Jinfeng, Wang, Qin, Liu, Kaishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195683
_version_ 1784582550969122816
author Wang, Mengjie
Shen, Jin
Thomas, John C.
Mu, Tongtong
Liu, Wei
Wang, Yajing
Pan, Jinfeng
Wang, Qin
Liu, Kaishi
author_facet Wang, Mengjie
Shen, Jin
Thomas, John C.
Mu, Tongtong
Liu, Wei
Wang, Yajing
Pan, Jinfeng
Wang, Qin
Liu, Kaishi
author_sort Wang, Mengjie
collection PubMed
description Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a popular method of particle size measurement, but at ultra-low particle concentrations, the occurrence of number concentration fluctuations limits the use of the technique. Number fluctuations add a non-Gaussian term to the scattered light intensity autocorrelation function (ACF). This leads to an inaccurate particle size distribution (PSD) being recovered if the normal DLS analysis model is used. We propose two methods for inverting the DLS data and recovering the PSDs when number fluctuations are apparent. One is to directly establish the relationship between the non-Gaussian ACF and the PSD by the kernel function reconstruction (KFR) method while including the non-Gaussian term to recover the PSD. The other is to remove the effect of the non-Gaussian term in the ACF by the baseline reset (BR) method. By including the number fluctuation term, the ideal recovered PSD can be obtained from the simulated data, but this will not happen in the experimental measurement data. This is because the measured intensity ACF contains more noise than the simulated ACF at ultra-low concentration. In particular, the baseline noise at the tail of long delay time of ACF overwhelms the number fluctuation term, making it difficult to recover reliable PSD data. Resetting the baseline can effectively remove the digital fluctuation term in ACF, which is also a feasible method to improve PSD recovery under ultra-low concentration. However, increasing noise at ultra-low concentrations can lead to errors in determining an effective baseline. This greatly reduces the accuracy of inversion results. Results from simulated and measured ACF data show that, for both methods, noise on the ACF limits reliable PSD recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85103492021-10-13 Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations Wang, Mengjie Shen, Jin Thomas, John C. Mu, Tongtong Liu, Wei Wang, Yajing Pan, Jinfeng Wang, Qin Liu, Kaishi Materials (Basel) Article Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a popular method of particle size measurement, but at ultra-low particle concentrations, the occurrence of number concentration fluctuations limits the use of the technique. Number fluctuations add a non-Gaussian term to the scattered light intensity autocorrelation function (ACF). This leads to an inaccurate particle size distribution (PSD) being recovered if the normal DLS analysis model is used. We propose two methods for inverting the DLS data and recovering the PSDs when number fluctuations are apparent. One is to directly establish the relationship between the non-Gaussian ACF and the PSD by the kernel function reconstruction (KFR) method while including the non-Gaussian term to recover the PSD. The other is to remove the effect of the non-Gaussian term in the ACF by the baseline reset (BR) method. By including the number fluctuation term, the ideal recovered PSD can be obtained from the simulated data, but this will not happen in the experimental measurement data. This is because the measured intensity ACF contains more noise than the simulated ACF at ultra-low concentration. In particular, the baseline noise at the tail of long delay time of ACF overwhelms the number fluctuation term, making it difficult to recover reliable PSD data. Resetting the baseline can effectively remove the digital fluctuation term in ACF, which is also a feasible method to improve PSD recovery under ultra-low concentration. However, increasing noise at ultra-low concentrations can lead to errors in determining an effective baseline. This greatly reduces the accuracy of inversion results. Results from simulated and measured ACF data show that, for both methods, noise on the ACF limits reliable PSD recovery. MDPI 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8510349/ /pubmed/34640079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195683 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Mengjie
Shen, Jin
Thomas, John C.
Mu, Tongtong
Liu, Wei
Wang, Yajing
Pan, Jinfeng
Wang, Qin
Liu, Kaishi
Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title_full Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title_fullStr Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title_full_unstemmed Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title_short Particle Size Measurement Using Dynamic Light Scattering at Ultra-Low Concentration Accounting for Particle Number Fluctuations
title_sort particle size measurement using dynamic light scattering at ultra-low concentration accounting for particle number fluctuations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195683
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmengjie particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT shenjin particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT thomasjohnc particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT mutongtong particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT liuwei particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT wangyajing particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT panjinfeng particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT wangqin particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations
AT liukaishi particlesizemeasurementusingdynamiclightscatteringatultralowconcentrationaccountingforparticlenumberfluctuations