Cargando…

Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility

Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna, Mysior, Martyna, Rusak, Agnieszka, Kuropka, Piotr, Kozakiewicz, Marcin, Jurczyszyn, Kamil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857
_version_ 1784582572542525440
author Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna
Mysior, Martyna
Rusak, Agnieszka
Kuropka, Piotr
Kozakiewicz, Marcin
Jurczyszyn, Kamil
author_facet Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna
Mysior, Martyna
Rusak, Agnieszka
Kuropka, Piotr
Kozakiewicz, Marcin
Jurczyszyn, Kamil
author_sort Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissues for a long time. The research material involves six types of cement used frequently in the subgingival region: Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany), Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) (Glass Ionomer Cements), Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) (Resin-based Cement), Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic), Harvard Polycarboxylat Cement (Harvard Dental, Great Britain) (Zinc polycarboxylate types of cement) and Agatos S (Chema-Elektromet, Poland) (Zinc Phosphate Cement). Texture and fractal dimension analysis was applied. An evaluation of cytotoxicity and cell adhesion was carried out. The fractal dimension of Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) differed in each of the tested types of cement. Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic) cytotoxicity was rated 4 on a 0–4 scale. The Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany) and Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) cements showed the most favorable conditions for the adhesion of fibroblasts, despite statistically significant differences in the fractal dimension of their surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85104382021-10-13 Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna Mysior, Martyna Rusak, Agnieszka Kuropka, Piotr Kozakiewicz, Marcin Jurczyszyn, Kamil Materials (Basel) Article Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissues for a long time. The research material involves six types of cement used frequently in the subgingival region: Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany), Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) (Glass Ionomer Cements), Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) (Resin-based Cement), Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic), Harvard Polycarboxylat Cement (Harvard Dental, Great Britain) (Zinc polycarboxylate types of cement) and Agatos S (Chema-Elektromet, Poland) (Zinc Phosphate Cement). Texture and fractal dimension analysis was applied. An evaluation of cytotoxicity and cell adhesion was carried out. The fractal dimension of Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) differed in each of the tested types of cement. Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic) cytotoxicity was rated 4 on a 0–4 scale. The Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany) and Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) cements showed the most favorable conditions for the adhesion of fibroblasts, despite statistically significant differences in the fractal dimension of their surfaces. MDPI 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8510438/ /pubmed/34640254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna
Mysior, Martyna
Rusak, Agnieszka
Kuropka, Piotr
Kozakiewicz, Marcin
Jurczyszyn, Kamil
Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title_full Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title_fullStr Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title_full_unstemmed Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title_short Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
title_sort application of texture and fractal dimension analysis to evaluate subgingival cement surfaces in terms of biocompatibility
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857
work_keys_str_mv AT skoskiewiczmalinowskakatarzyna applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility
AT mysiormartyna applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility
AT rusakagnieszka applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility
AT kuropkapiotr applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility
AT kozakiewiczmarcin applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility
AT jurczyszynkamil applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility