Cargando…
Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissue...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857 |
_version_ | 1784582572542525440 |
---|---|
author | Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna Mysior, Martyna Rusak, Agnieszka Kuropka, Piotr Kozakiewicz, Marcin Jurczyszyn, Kamil |
author_facet | Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna Mysior, Martyna Rusak, Agnieszka Kuropka, Piotr Kozakiewicz, Marcin Jurczyszyn, Kamil |
author_sort | Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissues for a long time. The research material involves six types of cement used frequently in the subgingival region: Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany), Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) (Glass Ionomer Cements), Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) (Resin-based Cement), Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic), Harvard Polycarboxylat Cement (Harvard Dental, Great Britain) (Zinc polycarboxylate types of cement) and Agatos S (Chema-Elektromet, Poland) (Zinc Phosphate Cement). Texture and fractal dimension analysis was applied. An evaluation of cytotoxicity and cell adhesion was carried out. The fractal dimension of Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) differed in each of the tested types of cement. Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic) cytotoxicity was rated 4 on a 0–4 scale. The Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany) and Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) cements showed the most favorable conditions for the adhesion of fibroblasts, despite statistically significant differences in the fractal dimension of their surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8510438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85104382021-10-13 Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna Mysior, Martyna Rusak, Agnieszka Kuropka, Piotr Kozakiewicz, Marcin Jurczyszyn, Kamil Materials (Basel) Article Biocompatibility is defined as “the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application”. Biocompatibility is especially important for restorative dentists as they use materials that remain in close contact with living tissues for a long time. The research material involves six types of cement used frequently in the subgingival region: Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany), Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) (Glass Ionomer Cements), Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) (Resin-based Cement), Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic), Harvard Polycarboxylat Cement (Harvard Dental, Great Britain) (Zinc polycarboxylate types of cement) and Agatos S (Chema-Elektromet, Poland) (Zinc Phosphate Cement). Texture and fractal dimension analysis was applied. An evaluation of cytotoxicity and cell adhesion was carried out. The fractal dimension of Breeze (Pentron Clinical, USA) differed in each of the tested types of cement. Adhesor Carbofine (Pentron, Czech Republic) cytotoxicity was rated 4 on a 0–4 scale. The Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, Germany) and Riva Self Cure (SDI, Australia) cements showed the most favorable conditions for the adhesion of fibroblasts, despite statistically significant differences in the fractal dimension of their surfaces. MDPI 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8510438/ /pubmed/34640254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Skośkiewicz-Malinowska, Katarzyna Mysior, Martyna Rusak, Agnieszka Kuropka, Piotr Kozakiewicz, Marcin Jurczyszyn, Kamil Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title | Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title_full | Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title_fullStr | Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title_short | Application of Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis to Evaluate Subgingival Cement Surfaces in Terms of Biocompatibility |
title_sort | application of texture and fractal dimension analysis to evaluate subgingival cement surfaces in terms of biocompatibility |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14195857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skoskiewiczmalinowskakatarzyna applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility AT mysiormartyna applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility AT rusakagnieszka applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility AT kuropkapiotr applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility AT kozakiewiczmarcin applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility AT jurczyszynkamil applicationoftextureandfractaldimensionanalysistoevaluatesubgingivalcementsurfacesintermsofbiocompatibility |