Cargando…
An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059 |
_version_ | 1784582611502366720 |
---|---|
author | Hasanov, Merve Milton, Denái R. Sharfman, William H. Taback, Bret Cranmer, Lee D. Daniels, Gregory A Flaherty, Lawrence Hallmeyer, Sigrun Milhem, Mohammed Feun, Lynn Hauke, Ralph Doolittle, Gary Gregory, Nancy Patel, Sapna |
author_facet | Hasanov, Merve Milton, Denái R. Sharfman, William H. Taback, Bret Cranmer, Lee D. Daniels, Gregory A Flaherty, Lawrence Hallmeyer, Sigrun Milhem, Mohammed Feun, Lynn Hauke, Ralph Doolittle, Gary Gregory, Nancy Patel, Sapna |
author_sort | Hasanov, Merve |
collection | PubMed |
description | Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced use of HD rIL-2 and IPI in MM patients. Eligible Stage IV MM patients were randomized to treatment with either two courses of HD rIL-2(600,000 IU/kg) followed by four doses of IPI 3 mg/kg or vice-versa. The primary objective was to compare one-year overall survival (OS) with historical control (46%, Hodi et al., NEJM 2010). Secondary objectives were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) profile. Evaluable Population (EP) included patients who received at least 50% of planned treatment with each drug. Thirteen and 16 patients were randomized to receive HD rIL-2 first, and IPI first, respectively. One-year OS rate was 75% for intention to treat population. Eighteen patients were included in EP, 8 in HD rIL-2, 10 in IPI first arm. In EP, 1-year OS, PFS and ORR rates were 87%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. The frequency of AEs was similar in both arms with 13 patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher AEs, 3 resulting in the end of study participation. There was one HD rIL-2-related death, from cerebral hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia. In this study with small sample size, HD rIL-2 and IPI were safe to administer sequentially in MM patients and showed more than additive effects. 1-year OS was superior to that of IPI alone from historical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8510610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85106102021-10-13 An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Hasanov, Merve Milton, Denái R. Sharfman, William H. Taback, Bret Cranmer, Lee D. Daniels, Gregory A Flaherty, Lawrence Hallmeyer, Sigrun Milhem, Mohammed Feun, Lynn Hauke, Ralph Doolittle, Gary Gregory, Nancy Patel, Sapna Oncoimmunology Research Article Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced use of HD rIL-2 and IPI in MM patients. Eligible Stage IV MM patients were randomized to treatment with either two courses of HD rIL-2(600,000 IU/kg) followed by four doses of IPI 3 mg/kg or vice-versa. The primary objective was to compare one-year overall survival (OS) with historical control (46%, Hodi et al., NEJM 2010). Secondary objectives were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) profile. Evaluable Population (EP) included patients who received at least 50% of planned treatment with each drug. Thirteen and 16 patients were randomized to receive HD rIL-2 first, and IPI first, respectively. One-year OS rate was 75% for intention to treat population. Eighteen patients were included in EP, 8 in HD rIL-2, 10 in IPI first arm. In EP, 1-year OS, PFS and ORR rates were 87%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. The frequency of AEs was similar in both arms with 13 patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher AEs, 3 resulting in the end of study participation. There was one HD rIL-2-related death, from cerebral hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia. In this study with small sample size, HD rIL-2 and IPI were safe to administer sequentially in MM patients and showed more than additive effects. 1-year OS was superior to that of IPI alone from historical studies. Taylor & Francis 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8510610/ /pubmed/34650833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hasanov, Merve Milton, Denái R. Sharfman, William H. Taback, Bret Cranmer, Lee D. Daniels, Gregory A Flaherty, Lawrence Hallmeyer, Sigrun Milhem, Mohammed Feun, Lynn Hauke, Ralph Doolittle, Gary Gregory, Nancy Patel, Sapna An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title | An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title_full | An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title_fullStr | An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title_short | An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma |
title_sort | open–label, randomized, multi–center study comparing the sequence of high dose aldesleukin (interleukin–2) and ipilimumab (yervoy) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasanovmerve anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT miltondenair anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT sharfmanwilliamh anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT tabackbret anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT cranmerleed anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT danielsgregorya anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT flahertylawrence anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT hallmeyersigrun anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT milhemmohammed anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT feunlynn anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT haukeralph anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT doolittlegary anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT gregorynancy anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT patelsapna anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT hasanovmerve openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT miltondenair openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT sharfmanwilliamh openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT tabackbret openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT cranmerleed openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT danielsgregorya openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT flahertylawrence openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT hallmeyersigrun openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT milhemmohammed openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT feunlynn openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT haukeralph openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT doolittlegary openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT gregorynancy openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT patelsapna openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma |