Cargando…

An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasanov, Merve, Milton, Denái R., Sharfman, William H., Taback, Bret, Cranmer, Lee D., Daniels, Gregory A, Flaherty, Lawrence, Hallmeyer, Sigrun, Milhem, Mohammed, Feun, Lynn, Hauke, Ralph, Doolittle, Gary, Gregory, Nancy, Patel, Sapna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059
_version_ 1784582611502366720
author Hasanov, Merve
Milton, Denái R.
Sharfman, William H.
Taback, Bret
Cranmer, Lee D.
Daniels, Gregory A
Flaherty, Lawrence
Hallmeyer, Sigrun
Milhem, Mohammed
Feun, Lynn
Hauke, Ralph
Doolittle, Gary
Gregory, Nancy
Patel, Sapna
author_facet Hasanov, Merve
Milton, Denái R.
Sharfman, William H.
Taback, Bret
Cranmer, Lee D.
Daniels, Gregory A
Flaherty, Lawrence
Hallmeyer, Sigrun
Milhem, Mohammed
Feun, Lynn
Hauke, Ralph
Doolittle, Gary
Gregory, Nancy
Patel, Sapna
author_sort Hasanov, Merve
collection PubMed
description Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced use of HD rIL-2 and IPI in MM patients. Eligible Stage IV MM patients were randomized to treatment with either two courses of HD rIL-2(600,000 IU/kg) followed by four doses of IPI 3 mg/kg or vice-versa. The primary objective was to compare one-year overall survival (OS) with historical control (46%, Hodi et al., NEJM 2010). Secondary objectives were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) profile. Evaluable Population (EP) included patients who received at least 50% of planned treatment with each drug. Thirteen and 16 patients were randomized to receive HD rIL-2 first, and IPI first, respectively. One-year OS rate was 75% for intention to treat population. Eighteen patients were included in EP, 8 in HD rIL-2, 10 in IPI first arm. In EP, 1-year OS, PFS and ORR rates were 87%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. The frequency of AEs was similar in both arms with 13 patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher AEs, 3 resulting in the end of study participation. There was one HD rIL-2-related death, from cerebral hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia. In this study with small sample size, HD rIL-2 and IPI were safe to administer sequentially in MM patients and showed more than additive effects. 1-year OS was superior to that of IPI alone from historical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85106102021-10-13 An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Hasanov, Merve Milton, Denái R. Sharfman, William H. Taback, Bret Cranmer, Lee D. Daniels, Gregory A Flaherty, Lawrence Hallmeyer, Sigrun Milhem, Mohammed Feun, Lynn Hauke, Ralph Doolittle, Gary Gregory, Nancy Patel, Sapna Oncoimmunology Research Article Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced use of HD rIL-2 and IPI in MM patients. Eligible Stage IV MM patients were randomized to treatment with either two courses of HD rIL-2(600,000 IU/kg) followed by four doses of IPI 3 mg/kg or vice-versa. The primary objective was to compare one-year overall survival (OS) with historical control (46%, Hodi et al., NEJM 2010). Secondary objectives were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) profile. Evaluable Population (EP) included patients who received at least 50% of planned treatment with each drug. Thirteen and 16 patients were randomized to receive HD rIL-2 first, and IPI first, respectively. One-year OS rate was 75% for intention to treat population. Eighteen patients were included in EP, 8 in HD rIL-2, 10 in IPI first arm. In EP, 1-year OS, PFS and ORR rates were 87%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. The frequency of AEs was similar in both arms with 13 patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher AEs, 3 resulting in the end of study participation. There was one HD rIL-2-related death, from cerebral hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia. In this study with small sample size, HD rIL-2 and IPI were safe to administer sequentially in MM patients and showed more than additive effects. 1-year OS was superior to that of IPI alone from historical studies. Taylor & Francis 2021-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8510610/ /pubmed/34650833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hasanov, Merve
Milton, Denái R.
Sharfman, William H.
Taback, Bret
Cranmer, Lee D.
Daniels, Gregory A
Flaherty, Lawrence
Hallmeyer, Sigrun
Milhem, Mohammed
Feun, Lynn
Hauke, Ralph
Doolittle, Gary
Gregory, Nancy
Patel, Sapna
An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title_full An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title_fullStr An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title_short An Open–Label, Randomized, Multi–Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin–2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
title_sort open–label, randomized, multi–center study comparing the sequence of high dose aldesleukin (interleukin–2) and ipilimumab (yervoy) in patients with metastatic melanoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34650833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1984059
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanovmerve anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT miltondenair anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT sharfmanwilliamh anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT tabackbret anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT cranmerleed anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT danielsgregorya anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT flahertylawrence anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT hallmeyersigrun anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT milhemmohammed anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT feunlynn anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT haukeralph anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT doolittlegary anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT gregorynancy anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT patelsapna anopenlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT hasanovmerve openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT miltondenair openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT sharfmanwilliamh openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT tabackbret openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT cranmerleed openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT danielsgregorya openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT flahertylawrence openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT hallmeyersigrun openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT milhemmohammed openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT feunlynn openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT haukeralph openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT doolittlegary openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT gregorynancy openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma
AT patelsapna openlabelrandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingthesequenceofhighdosealdesleukininterleukin2andipilimumabyervoyinpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma