Cargando…

Determining the effects of blended learning using the community of inquiry on nursing students' learning gains in sudden patient deterioration module

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of blended learning using the community of inquiry framework on nursing students' learning gains in a sudden patient deterioration module. DESIGN: A quasi‐experimental trial. METHODS: 233 Chinese nursing students in their fourth semester of a sudden patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Weichu, Wang, Jun, Zhang, Han, Yu, Changfeng, Liu, Shuai, Zhang, Cen, Yu, Jingya, Liu, Qiao, Yang, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.914
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of blended learning using the community of inquiry framework on nursing students' learning gains in a sudden patient deterioration module. DESIGN: A quasi‐experimental trial. METHODS: 233 Chinese nursing students in their fourth semester of a sudden patient deterioration learning module were assigned to control (N = 113) and experimental group (N = 120). Students in experimental group engaged in community of inquiry‐based blended learning in sudden patient deterioration module, including computer‐aided self‐instruction, team‐based topic discussion and simulation training. Control group learned similar contents through face‐to‐face teaching comprising of a presentation with lecture, tutorial and simulation training. Student assessment of learning gains, knowledge and practical ability was quantified after the interventions. RESULTS: Compared with control group, students in experimental group had improved student assessment of learning gains (p = .001, Cohen d = 0.69) and practical ability (p < .001, Cohen d = 0.48). Although no significant difference in overall knowledge score, experimental group students did better performance in application and analysis (p = .001, Cohen d = 0.45).