Cargando…
Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)
In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9 |
_version_ | 1784582669060800512 |
---|---|
author | Brix, Saskia Held, Christoph Kaiser, Stefanie Jennings, Robert M. Driskell, Amy Brandt, Angelika |
author_facet | Brix, Saskia Held, Christoph Kaiser, Stefanie Jennings, Robert M. Driskell, Amy Brandt, Angelika |
author_sort | Brix, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships are not completely understood. There is little doubt about the close relationship of these families, but the taxonomic position of a number of genera is so far unknown. Based on a combined morphological phylogeny using the Hennigian method with a dataset of 107 described species and a molecular phylogeny based on three markers (COI, 16S, and 18S) with 75 species (most new to science), we could separate Desmosomatidae and Nannoniscidae as separate families. However, we could not support the concept of the subfamilies Eugerdellatinae Hessler, 1970 and Desmosomatinae Hessler, 1970. Most genera of both families were well supported, but several genera appear as para- or even polyphyletic. Within both families, convergent evolution and analogies caused difficulty in defining apomorphies for phylogenetic reconstructions and this is reflected in the results of the concatenated molecular tree. There is no biogeographic pattern in the distribution as the genera occur over the entire Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, showing no specific phylogeographical pattern. Poor resolution at deep desmosomatid nodes may reflect the long evolutionary history of the family and rapid evolutionary radiations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8510888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85108882021-10-13 Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) Brix, Saskia Held, Christoph Kaiser, Stefanie Jennings, Robert M. Driskell, Amy Brandt, Angelika Org Divers Evol Original Article In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships are not completely understood. There is little doubt about the close relationship of these families, but the taxonomic position of a number of genera is so far unknown. Based on a combined morphological phylogeny using the Hennigian method with a dataset of 107 described species and a molecular phylogeny based on three markers (COI, 16S, and 18S) with 75 species (most new to science), we could separate Desmosomatidae and Nannoniscidae as separate families. However, we could not support the concept of the subfamilies Eugerdellatinae Hessler, 1970 and Desmosomatinae Hessler, 1970. Most genera of both families were well supported, but several genera appear as para- or even polyphyletic. Within both families, convergent evolution and analogies caused difficulty in defining apomorphies for phylogenetic reconstructions and this is reflected in the results of the concatenated molecular tree. There is no biogeographic pattern in the distribution as the genera occur over the entire Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, showing no specific phylogeographical pattern. Poor resolution at deep desmosomatid nodes may reflect the long evolutionary history of the family and rapid evolutionary radiations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8510888/ /pubmed/34658667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Brix, Saskia Held, Christoph Kaiser, Stefanie Jennings, Robert M. Driskell, Amy Brandt, Angelika Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title | Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title_full | Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title_fullStr | Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title_short | Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota) |
title_sort | evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families desmosomatidae sars, 1897 and nannoniscidae hansen, 1916 (isopoda: asellota) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brixsaskia evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota AT heldchristoph evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota AT kaiserstefanie evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota AT jenningsrobertm evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota AT driskellamy evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota AT brandtangelika evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota |