Cargando…

Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)

In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brix, Saskia, Held, Christoph, Kaiser, Stefanie, Jennings, Robert M., Driskell, Amy, Brandt, Angelika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9
_version_ 1784582669060800512
author Brix, Saskia
Held, Christoph
Kaiser, Stefanie
Jennings, Robert M.
Driskell, Amy
Brandt, Angelika
author_facet Brix, Saskia
Held, Christoph
Kaiser, Stefanie
Jennings, Robert M.
Driskell, Amy
Brandt, Angelika
author_sort Brix, Saskia
collection PubMed
description In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships are not completely understood. There is little doubt about the close relationship of these families, but the taxonomic position of a number of genera is so far unknown. Based on a combined morphological phylogeny using the Hennigian method with a dataset of 107 described species and a molecular phylogeny based on three markers (COI, 16S, and 18S) with 75 species (most new to science), we could separate Desmosomatidae and Nannoniscidae as separate families. However, we could not support the concept of the subfamilies Eugerdellatinae Hessler, 1970 and Desmosomatinae Hessler, 1970. Most genera of both families were well supported, but several genera appear as para- or even polyphyletic. Within both families, convergent evolution and analogies caused difficulty in defining apomorphies for phylogenetic reconstructions and this is reflected in the results of the concatenated molecular tree. There is no biogeographic pattern in the distribution as the genera occur over the entire Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, showing no specific phylogeographical pattern. Poor resolution at deep desmosomatid nodes may reflect the long evolutionary history of the family and rapid evolutionary radiations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85108882021-10-13 Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota) Brix, Saskia Held, Christoph Kaiser, Stefanie Jennings, Robert M. Driskell, Amy Brandt, Angelika Org Divers Evol Original Article In the deep sea, the phylogeny and biogeography of only a few taxa have been well studied. Although more than 200 species in 32 genera have been described for the asellote isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 from all ocean basins, their phylogenetic relationships are not completely understood. There is little doubt about the close relationship of these families, but the taxonomic position of a number of genera is so far unknown. Based on a combined morphological phylogeny using the Hennigian method with a dataset of 107 described species and a molecular phylogeny based on three markers (COI, 16S, and 18S) with 75 species (most new to science), we could separate Desmosomatidae and Nannoniscidae as separate families. However, we could not support the concept of the subfamilies Eugerdellatinae Hessler, 1970 and Desmosomatinae Hessler, 1970. Most genera of both families were well supported, but several genera appear as para- or even polyphyletic. Within both families, convergent evolution and analogies caused difficulty in defining apomorphies for phylogenetic reconstructions and this is reflected in the results of the concatenated molecular tree. There is no biogeographic pattern in the distribution as the genera occur over the entire Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, showing no specific phylogeographical pattern. Poor resolution at deep desmosomatid nodes may reflect the long evolutionary history of the family and rapid evolutionary radiations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8510888/ /pubmed/34658667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Brix, Saskia
Held, Christoph
Kaiser, Stefanie
Jennings, Robert M.
Driskell, Amy
Brandt, Angelika
Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title_full Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title_fullStr Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title_full_unstemmed Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title_short Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916  (Isopoda: Asellota)
title_sort evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families desmosomatidae sars, 1897 and nannoniscidae hansen, 1916  (isopoda: asellota)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00509-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brixsaskia evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota
AT heldchristoph evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota
AT kaiserstefanie evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota
AT jenningsrobertm evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota
AT driskellamy evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota
AT brandtangelika evolutionandphylogenyofthedeepseaisopodfamiliesdesmosomatidaesars1897andnannoniscidaehansen1916isopodaasellota