Cargando…

Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study

ABSTRACT: SUMMARY: Human body height loss of 3–4 cm or more may be considered a simple indicator of increasing fracture risk, where the information is very similar to the results from fracture risk assessments by available online calculators, all of them based on a multiple variable approaches. INTR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pluskiewicz, W., Adamczyk, P., Drozdzowska, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33818635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05941-3
_version_ 1784582670528806912
author Pluskiewicz, W.
Adamczyk, P.
Drozdzowska, B.
author_facet Pluskiewicz, W.
Adamczyk, P.
Drozdzowska, B.
author_sort Pluskiewicz, W.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: SUMMARY: Human body height loss of 3–4 cm or more may be considered a simple indicator of increasing fracture risk, where the information is very similar to the results from fracture risk assessments by available online calculators, all of them based on a multiple variable approaches. INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between body height loss (HL) and fracture risk in postmenopausal women from the Gliwice Osteoporosis (GO) Study. METHODS: The study sample included 1735 postmenopausal women, aged over 55 years and recruited at the Osteoporotic Outpatient Clinic. The mean age of the study participants was 68.15 ± 8.16 years. Fracture risk was established, using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) (10-year probability of major and hip fractures), the Garvan calculator (any and hip fractures, 5 and 10 years) and the Polish (POL-RISK) algorithm, available at www.fracture-risk.pl (any fractures, 5 years). Bone densitometry at the femoral neck was performed, using a Prodigy device (Lunar, GE, USA). Body heights were measured before bone densitometry, using a wall stadiometer and compared with the maximum body heights, measured in early adulthood and reported by the study participants themselves. RESULTS: In 199 women, the body heights, measured during the study, did not change in comparison to their corresponding values in early adulthood, while being decreased in the other 1536 women. The mean height loss (HL) in the whole study group was 3.95 ± 3.24 cm. That HL correlated significantly with the calculated fracture risk (the r range from 0.13 to 0.39, p < 0.0001). In general, regarding the patients with fracture risk close to the recommended therapeutic thresholds, HL was around 3–4 cm, except of the values from the FRAX calculator for major fractures, where the commonly used therapeutic threshold (20%) was related to HL of approximately 6.5 cm. In subjects with HL between 3.5 and 4 cm (n = 208), the FRAX value for major fractures was 6.83 ± 3.74. CONCLUSIONS: Body height measurements, carried out to establish HL, provide an important information for clinical practice, where HL of 3–4 cm or more may be considered a simple indicator of increasing fracture risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8510894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85108942021-10-19 Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study Pluskiewicz, W. Adamczyk, P. Drozdzowska, B. Osteoporos Int Original Article ABSTRACT: SUMMARY: Human body height loss of 3–4 cm or more may be considered a simple indicator of increasing fracture risk, where the information is very similar to the results from fracture risk assessments by available online calculators, all of them based on a multiple variable approaches. INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between body height loss (HL) and fracture risk in postmenopausal women from the Gliwice Osteoporosis (GO) Study. METHODS: The study sample included 1735 postmenopausal women, aged over 55 years and recruited at the Osteoporotic Outpatient Clinic. The mean age of the study participants was 68.15 ± 8.16 years. Fracture risk was established, using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) (10-year probability of major and hip fractures), the Garvan calculator (any and hip fractures, 5 and 10 years) and the Polish (POL-RISK) algorithm, available at www.fracture-risk.pl (any fractures, 5 years). Bone densitometry at the femoral neck was performed, using a Prodigy device (Lunar, GE, USA). Body heights were measured before bone densitometry, using a wall stadiometer and compared with the maximum body heights, measured in early adulthood and reported by the study participants themselves. RESULTS: In 199 women, the body heights, measured during the study, did not change in comparison to their corresponding values in early adulthood, while being decreased in the other 1536 women. The mean height loss (HL) in the whole study group was 3.95 ± 3.24 cm. That HL correlated significantly with the calculated fracture risk (the r range from 0.13 to 0.39, p < 0.0001). In general, regarding the patients with fracture risk close to the recommended therapeutic thresholds, HL was around 3–4 cm, except of the values from the FRAX calculator for major fractures, where the commonly used therapeutic threshold (20%) was related to HL of approximately 6.5 cm. In subjects with HL between 3.5 and 4 cm (n = 208), the FRAX value for major fractures was 6.83 ± 3.74. CONCLUSIONS: Body height measurements, carried out to establish HL, provide an important information for clinical practice, where HL of 3–4 cm or more may be considered a simple indicator of increasing fracture risk. Springer London 2021-04-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8510894/ /pubmed/33818635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05941-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Pluskiewicz, W.
Adamczyk, P.
Drozdzowska, B.
Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title_full Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title_fullStr Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title_full_unstemmed Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title_short Height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? Results from the GO Study
title_sort height loss in postmenopausal women—do we need more for fracture risk assessment? results from the go study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33818635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05941-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pluskiewiczw heightlossinpostmenopausalwomendoweneedmoreforfractureriskassessmentresultsfromthegostudy
AT adamczykp heightlossinpostmenopausalwomendoweneedmoreforfractureriskassessmentresultsfromthegostudy
AT drozdzowskab heightlossinpostmenopausalwomendoweneedmoreforfractureriskassessmentresultsfromthegostudy