Cargando…
The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019
PURPOSE: To evaluate and report the complications, and to analyse antimicrobial stewardship aspects following prostate biopsies (P-Bx) based on the data from a 9-year global study. METHODS: The primary outcome was to compare complications after P-Bx between patients of two cohorts: 2010–2014 and 201...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8 |
_version_ | 1784582678127837184 |
---|---|
author | Alidjanov, Jakhongir F. Cai, Tommaso Bartoletti, Riccardo Bonkat, Gernot Bruyère, Franck Köves, Béla Kulchavenya, Ekaterina Medina-Polo, José Naber, Kurt Perepanova, Tamara Pilatz, Adrian Tandogdu, Zafer Bjerklund Johansen, Truls E. Wagenlehner, Florian M. |
author_facet | Alidjanov, Jakhongir F. Cai, Tommaso Bartoletti, Riccardo Bonkat, Gernot Bruyère, Franck Köves, Béla Kulchavenya, Ekaterina Medina-Polo, José Naber, Kurt Perepanova, Tamara Pilatz, Adrian Tandogdu, Zafer Bjerklund Johansen, Truls E. Wagenlehner, Florian M. |
author_sort | Alidjanov, Jakhongir F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate and report the complications, and to analyse antimicrobial stewardship aspects following prostate biopsies (P-Bx) based on the data from a 9-year global study. METHODS: The primary outcome was to compare complications after P-Bx between patients of two cohorts: 2010–2014 and 2016–2019. Primary outcomes included symptoms of lower and severe/systemic urinary tract infection (LUTIS and SUTIS, respectively), and positive urine culture. Readmission to hospital after P-Bx, need for additional antimicrobial therapy, consumption of different antimicrobial agents for prophylaxis and therapy were evaluated. Students t test and chi-square test were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 1615 men. Fluoroquinolones-based prophylaxis rate increased from 72.0% in 2010–2014 to 78.6% in 2015–2019. Overall rates of complications increased from 6 to 11.7% including an increase in symptomatic complications from 4.7 to 10.2%, mainly due to an increase in LUTIS. Rates of patients seeking additional medical help in primary care after P-Bx increased from 7.4 to 14.4%; cases requiring post P-Bx antibiotic treatment increased from 6.1 to 9.7%, most of which received fluoroquinolones. Transperineal P-Bx was significantly associated with LUTIS. Following transrectal P-Bx, 2.8% developed febrile infections and 4.0% required hospitalisation. Two men (0.12%) died after transrectal P-Bx due to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of complications after P-Bx tended to increase in time, as well as rates of patients seeking additional medical help in the post-P-Bx period. To reduce the risk of infectious complications and to comply with the principles of antibiotic stewardship, clinicians should switch to the transperineal biopsy route. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8510929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85109292021-10-27 The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 Alidjanov, Jakhongir F. Cai, Tommaso Bartoletti, Riccardo Bonkat, Gernot Bruyère, Franck Köves, Béla Kulchavenya, Ekaterina Medina-Polo, José Naber, Kurt Perepanova, Tamara Pilatz, Adrian Tandogdu, Zafer Bjerklund Johansen, Truls E. Wagenlehner, Florian M. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and report the complications, and to analyse antimicrobial stewardship aspects following prostate biopsies (P-Bx) based on the data from a 9-year global study. METHODS: The primary outcome was to compare complications after P-Bx between patients of two cohorts: 2010–2014 and 2016–2019. Primary outcomes included symptoms of lower and severe/systemic urinary tract infection (LUTIS and SUTIS, respectively), and positive urine culture. Readmission to hospital after P-Bx, need for additional antimicrobial therapy, consumption of different antimicrobial agents for prophylaxis and therapy were evaluated. Students t test and chi-square test were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 1615 men. Fluoroquinolones-based prophylaxis rate increased from 72.0% in 2010–2014 to 78.6% in 2015–2019. Overall rates of complications increased from 6 to 11.7% including an increase in symptomatic complications from 4.7 to 10.2%, mainly due to an increase in LUTIS. Rates of patients seeking additional medical help in primary care after P-Bx increased from 7.4 to 14.4%; cases requiring post P-Bx antibiotic treatment increased from 6.1 to 9.7%, most of which received fluoroquinolones. Transperineal P-Bx was significantly associated with LUTIS. Following transrectal P-Bx, 2.8% developed febrile infections and 4.0% required hospitalisation. Two men (0.12%) died after transrectal P-Bx due to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of complications after P-Bx tended to increase in time, as well as rates of patients seeking additional medical help in the post-P-Bx period. To reduce the risk of infectious complications and to comply with the principles of antibiotic stewardship, clinicians should switch to the transperineal biopsy route. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8510929/ /pubmed/33615393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alidjanov, Jakhongir F. Cai, Tommaso Bartoletti, Riccardo Bonkat, Gernot Bruyère, Franck Köves, Béla Kulchavenya, Ekaterina Medina-Polo, José Naber, Kurt Perepanova, Tamara Pilatz, Adrian Tandogdu, Zafer Bjerklund Johansen, Truls E. Wagenlehner, Florian M. The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title | The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title_full | The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title_fullStr | The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title_short | The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
title_sort | negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03614-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alidjanovjakhongirf thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT caitommaso thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bartolettiriccardo thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bonkatgernot thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bruyerefranck thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT kovesbela thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT kulchavenyaekaterina thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT medinapolojose thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT naberkurt thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT perepanovatamara thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT pilatzadrian thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT tandogduzafer thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bjerklundjohansentrulse thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT wagenlehnerflorianm thenegativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT alidjanovjakhongirf negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT caitommaso negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bartolettiriccardo negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bonkatgernot negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bruyerefranck negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT kovesbela negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT kulchavenyaekaterina negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT medinapolojose negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT naberkurt negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT perepanovatamara negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT pilatzadrian negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT tandogduzafer negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT bjerklundjohansentrulse negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 AT wagenlehnerflorianm negativeaftermathofprostatebiopsyprophylaxiscomplicationsandantimicrobialstewardshipresultsoftheglobalprevalencestudyofinfectionsinurology20102019 |