Cargando…

Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study

This pilot study aimed to determine if a biophilic Green Therapy or Virtual Reality environment can decrease an oncology patient’s pain and distress while receiving chemotherapy. A case-crossover pilot study was conducted in a comprehensive cancer infusion center. 33 participants with breast, gyneco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashley Verzwyvelt, L., McNamara, Ann, Xu, Xiaohui, Stubbins, Renee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99763-2
_version_ 1784582693979160576
author Ashley Verzwyvelt, L.
McNamara, Ann
Xu, Xiaohui
Stubbins, Renee
author_facet Ashley Verzwyvelt, L.
McNamara, Ann
Xu, Xiaohui
Stubbins, Renee
author_sort Ashley Verzwyvelt, L.
collection PubMed
description This pilot study aimed to determine if a biophilic Green Therapy or Virtual Reality environment can decrease an oncology patient’s pain and distress while receiving chemotherapy. A case-crossover pilot study was conducted in a comprehensive cancer infusion center. 33 participants with breast, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, pancreatic and prostate cancers were all included in three rooms in a random order at different cycles: control room, Green Therapy room, and Virtual Reality room to receive chemotherapy, respectively. Participants’ pain, distress, heart rate, blood pressure, and saliva cortisol were measured before and after infusion in each room. No statistical significance differences were shown in the changes of heart rate, systolic, or diastolic blood pressure, saliva cortisol, pain, or distress before and after infusion between the control, Green Therapy, and Virtual Reality rooms. However, more patients reported the experience as “fun” and “enjoyable” when they were in Green Therapy or Virtual reality room as compared to in the control room. Additionally, since participating in the study, 14 patients reported spending at least 30 min or more outside in nature. In this study, we found that patients’ heart rate, blood pressure, and self-reported distress levels were reduced after each biophilic intervention although results are not statistically significant. The study also suggested that biophilic interventions are safe and feasible and may complement the standard of care for oncology patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85110092021-10-13 Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study Ashley Verzwyvelt, L. McNamara, Ann Xu, Xiaohui Stubbins, Renee Sci Rep Article This pilot study aimed to determine if a biophilic Green Therapy or Virtual Reality environment can decrease an oncology patient’s pain and distress while receiving chemotherapy. A case-crossover pilot study was conducted in a comprehensive cancer infusion center. 33 participants with breast, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, pancreatic and prostate cancers were all included in three rooms in a random order at different cycles: control room, Green Therapy room, and Virtual Reality room to receive chemotherapy, respectively. Participants’ pain, distress, heart rate, blood pressure, and saliva cortisol were measured before and after infusion in each room. No statistical significance differences were shown in the changes of heart rate, systolic, or diastolic blood pressure, saliva cortisol, pain, or distress before and after infusion between the control, Green Therapy, and Virtual Reality rooms. However, more patients reported the experience as “fun” and “enjoyable” when they were in Green Therapy or Virtual reality room as compared to in the control room. Additionally, since participating in the study, 14 patients reported spending at least 30 min or more outside in nature. In this study, we found that patients’ heart rate, blood pressure, and self-reported distress levels were reduced after each biophilic intervention although results are not statistically significant. The study also suggested that biophilic interventions are safe and feasible and may complement the standard of care for oncology patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8511009/ /pubmed/34642416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99763-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ashley Verzwyvelt, L.
McNamara, Ann
Xu, Xiaohui
Stubbins, Renee
Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title_full Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title_fullStr Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title_short Effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
title_sort effects of virtual reality v. biophilic environments on pain and distress in oncology patients: a case-crossover pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34642416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99763-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleyverzwyveltl effectsofvirtualrealityvbiophilicenvironmentsonpainanddistressinoncologypatientsacasecrossoverpilotstudy
AT mcnamaraann effectsofvirtualrealityvbiophilicenvironmentsonpainanddistressinoncologypatientsacasecrossoverpilotstudy
AT xuxiaohui effectsofvirtualrealityvbiophilicenvironmentsonpainanddistressinoncologypatientsacasecrossoverpilotstudy
AT stubbinsrenee effectsofvirtualrealityvbiophilicenvironmentsonpainanddistressinoncologypatientsacasecrossoverpilotstudy