Cargando…

Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background: The association between coronary physiology and immunoinflammation has not been investigated. We performed a retrospective study using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to evaluate the interaction between immunoinflammatory biomarkers and coronary physiology. Methods: A total of 172 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chengzhe, Yu, Zhiyao, Chen, Huaqiang, Wang, Jun, Liu, Wei, Zhou, Liping, Wang, Yueyi, Chen, Hu, Zhou, Huixin, Liu, Zhihao, Han, Jiapeng, Jiang, Hong, Yu, Lilei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.714276
_version_ 1784582767947808768
author Liu, Chengzhe
Yu, Zhiyao
Chen, Huaqiang
Wang, Jun
Liu, Wei
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Yueyi
Chen, Hu
Zhou, Huixin
Liu, Zhihao
Han, Jiapeng
Jiang, Hong
Yu, Lilei
author_facet Liu, Chengzhe
Yu, Zhiyao
Chen, Huaqiang
Wang, Jun
Liu, Wei
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Yueyi
Chen, Hu
Zhou, Huixin
Liu, Zhihao
Han, Jiapeng
Jiang, Hong
Yu, Lilei
author_sort Liu, Chengzhe
collection PubMed
description Background: The association between coronary physiology and immunoinflammation has not been investigated. We performed a retrospective study using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to evaluate the interaction between immunoinflammatory biomarkers and coronary physiology. Methods: A total of 172 patients with CAD who underwent coronary arteriography (CAG) and QFR were continuously enrolled from May 2020 to February 2021. As a quantitative indicator of coronary physiology, QFR can reflect the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. The target vessel measured by QFR was defined as that with the most severe lesions. Significant coronary anatomical stenosis was defined as 70% stenosis in the target vessel. Results: Compared with the QFR > 0.8 group, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interferon (IFN)-γ were increased and CD3(+) and CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts were decreased in the QFR ≤ 0.8 group. In addition, patients with DS ≤ 70% had higher IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α levels and decreased CD3(+) and CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts than those with DS > 70%. Logistic regression analysis indicated IL-6 to be an independent predictor of significant coronary functional and anatomic stenosis (odds ratio, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.059–1.196; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that IL-6 > 6.36 was predictive of QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel. The combination of IL-6, IL-10 and CD4 improved the value for predicting QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.661–0.810). Conclusion: Among immunoinflammatory biomarkers, IL-6 was independently associated with a higher risk of QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel. The combination of immunoinflammatory biomarkers was highly predictive of significant coronary functional and anatomic stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85114622021-10-14 Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Liu, Chengzhe Yu, Zhiyao Chen, Huaqiang Wang, Jun Liu, Wei Zhou, Liping Wang, Yueyi Chen, Hu Zhou, Huixin Liu, Zhihao Han, Jiapeng Jiang, Hong Yu, Lilei Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The association between coronary physiology and immunoinflammation has not been investigated. We performed a retrospective study using quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to evaluate the interaction between immunoinflammatory biomarkers and coronary physiology. Methods: A total of 172 patients with CAD who underwent coronary arteriography (CAG) and QFR were continuously enrolled from May 2020 to February 2021. As a quantitative indicator of coronary physiology, QFR can reflect the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. The target vessel measured by QFR was defined as that with the most severe lesions. Significant coronary anatomical stenosis was defined as 70% stenosis in the target vessel. Results: Compared with the QFR > 0.8 group, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interferon (IFN)-γ were increased and CD3(+) and CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts were decreased in the QFR ≤ 0.8 group. In addition, patients with DS ≤ 70% had higher IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α levels and decreased CD3(+) and CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts than those with DS > 70%. Logistic regression analysis indicated IL-6 to be an independent predictor of significant coronary functional and anatomic stenosis (odds ratio, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.059–1.196; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that IL-6 > 6.36 was predictive of QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel. The combination of IL-6, IL-10 and CD4 improved the value for predicting QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.661–0.810). Conclusion: Among immunoinflammatory biomarkers, IL-6 was independently associated with a higher risk of QFR ≤ 0.8 of the target vessel. The combination of immunoinflammatory biomarkers was highly predictive of significant coronary functional and anatomic stenosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8511462/ /pubmed/34660716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.714276 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Yu, Chen, Wang, Liu, Zhou, Wang, Chen, Zhou, Liu, Han, Jiang and Yu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Liu, Chengzhe
Yu, Zhiyao
Chen, Huaqiang
Wang, Jun
Liu, Wei
Zhou, Liping
Wang, Yueyi
Chen, Hu
Zhou, Huixin
Liu, Zhihao
Han, Jiapeng
Jiang, Hong
Yu, Lilei
Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Relationship Between Immunoinflammation and Coronary Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort relationship between immunoinflammation and coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients with coronary artery disease
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.714276
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchengzhe relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT yuzhiyao relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT chenhuaqiang relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT wangjun relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT liuwei relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT zhouliping relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT wangyueyi relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT chenhu relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT zhouhuixin relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT liuzhihao relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT hanjiapeng relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT jianghong relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease
AT yulilei relationshipbetweenimmunoinflammationandcoronaryphysiologyevaluatedbyquantitativeflowratioinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease