Cargando…

Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine

Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auinger, Alice Barbara, Dahm, Valerie, Liepins, Rudolfs, Riss, Dominik, Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter, Arnoldner, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.742219
_version_ 1784582775746068480
author Auinger, Alice Barbara
Dahm, Valerie
Liepins, Rudolfs
Riss, Dominik
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Arnoldner, Christoph
author_facet Auinger, Alice Barbara
Dahm, Valerie
Liepins, Rudolfs
Riss, Dominik
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Arnoldner, Christoph
author_sort Auinger, Alice Barbara
collection PubMed
description Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interest if preoperative planning of a safe trajectory to the middle ear is possible with clinically available image data. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of robotic cochlear implant surgery in 50 patients (100 ears) scheduled for routine cochlear implant procedures based on clinically available imaging. The primary objective was to assess if available high-resolution computed tomography or cone beam tomography imaging is sufficient for planning a trajectory by an otological software. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of cochlear implant surgery with a drill bit diameter of 1.8 mm, which is the currently used as a standard drill bit. Furthermore, it was evaluated if feasibility of robotic surgery could be increased when using smaller drill bit sizes. Cochlear and trajectory parameters of successfully planned ears were collected. Measurements were carried out by two observers and the interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Under the prerequisite of the available image data being sufficient for the planning of the procedure, up to two thirds of ears were eligible for robotic cochlear implant surgery with the standard drill bit size of 1.8 mm. The main reason for inability to plan the keyhole access was insufficient image resolution causing anatomical landmarks not being accurately identified. Although currently not applicable in robotic cochlear implantation, narrower drill bit sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 mm in diameter could increase feasibility up to 100%. The interrater agreement between the two observers was good for this data set. Discussion: For robotic cochlear implant surgery, imaging with sufficient resolution is essential for preoperative assessment. A slice thickness of <0.3 mm is necessary for trajectory planning. This can be achieved by using digital volume tomography while radiation exposure can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, surgeons who use the software tool, should be trained on a regular basis in order to achieve planning consistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85114932021-10-14 Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine Auinger, Alice Barbara Dahm, Valerie Liepins, Rudolfs Riss, Dominik Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter Arnoldner, Christoph Front Surg Surgery Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interest if preoperative planning of a safe trajectory to the middle ear is possible with clinically available image data. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of robotic cochlear implant surgery in 50 patients (100 ears) scheduled for routine cochlear implant procedures based on clinically available imaging. The primary objective was to assess if available high-resolution computed tomography or cone beam tomography imaging is sufficient for planning a trajectory by an otological software. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of cochlear implant surgery with a drill bit diameter of 1.8 mm, which is the currently used as a standard drill bit. Furthermore, it was evaluated if feasibility of robotic surgery could be increased when using smaller drill bit sizes. Cochlear and trajectory parameters of successfully planned ears were collected. Measurements were carried out by two observers and the interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Under the prerequisite of the available image data being sufficient for the planning of the procedure, up to two thirds of ears were eligible for robotic cochlear implant surgery with the standard drill bit size of 1.8 mm. The main reason for inability to plan the keyhole access was insufficient image resolution causing anatomical landmarks not being accurately identified. Although currently not applicable in robotic cochlear implantation, narrower drill bit sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 mm in diameter could increase feasibility up to 100%. The interrater agreement between the two observers was good for this data set. Discussion: For robotic cochlear implant surgery, imaging with sufficient resolution is essential for preoperative assessment. A slice thickness of <0.3 mm is necessary for trajectory planning. This can be achieved by using digital volume tomography while radiation exposure can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, surgeons who use the software tool, should be trained on a regular basis in order to achieve planning consistency. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8511493/ /pubmed/34660683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.742219 Text en Copyright © 2021 Auinger, Dahm, Liepins, Riss, Baumgartner and Arnoldner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Auinger, Alice Barbara
Dahm, Valerie
Liepins, Rudolfs
Riss, Dominik
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Arnoldner, Christoph
Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title_full Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title_fullStr Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title_short Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine
title_sort robotic cochlear implant surgery: imaging-based evaluation of feasibility in clinical routine
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660683
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.742219
work_keys_str_mv AT auingeralicebarbara roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine
AT dahmvalerie roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine
AT liepinsrudolfs roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine
AT rissdominik roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine
AT baumgartnerwolfdieter roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine
AT arnoldnerchristoph roboticcochlearimplantsurgeryimagingbasedevaluationoffeasibilityinclinicalroutine