Cargando…

The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management and operation of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry around the world. It has prompted regulatory authorities to consider new ways of working and introduced, among others, remote inspections to validate the integrity of the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mofid, Sarah, Bolislis, Winona Rei, Brading, Clive, Hamilton, Nigel, Hardit, Cyril, Nagaoka, Makoto, Parain, Julien, Zanta, Maria, Kühler, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.003
_version_ 1784582813751705600
author Mofid, Sarah
Bolislis, Winona Rei
Brading, Clive
Hamilton, Nigel
Hardit, Cyril
Nagaoka, Makoto
Parain, Julien
Zanta, Maria
Kühler, Thomas C.
author_facet Mofid, Sarah
Bolislis, Winona Rei
Brading, Clive
Hamilton, Nigel
Hardit, Cyril
Nagaoka, Makoto
Parain, Julien
Zanta, Maria
Kühler, Thomas C.
author_sort Mofid, Sarah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management and operation of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry around the world. It has prompted regulatory authorities to consider new ways of working and introduced, among others, remote inspections to validate the integrity of the regulatory data submitted by companies, to evaluate the quality of production and manufacturing sites, and to ensure the conformity with Good Regulatory Practices with the overall goal of guaranteeing patient safety during the crisis. METHOD: This article summarizes and discusses remote inspection guidelines and other related information made available by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (Japan), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (United Kingdom), and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We also analyze the effect of the pandemic on inspections conducted by the inspectorates of the EMA and the FDA. FINDINGS: The regulatory authorities that we studied all recognized the importance of implementing regulatory policies on remote inspections in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The remote inspection guidelines from the 5 selected regulatory authorities aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic but, while providing valuable advice to the pharmaceutical companies and being similar in intent, were not always aligned in terms of approach and solutions. IMPLICATIONS: On-site inspections are likely to continue to be the norm and the preferred standard for the foreseeable future. However, health authorities will need to further adopt a risk-based inspection approach and stimulate the increased uptake of inspection reliance as proposed by the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme not to overwhelm the pharmaceutical companies with repeat and redundant inspections. Remote inspections have proven to be a new inspection tool, but health authorities should align on their approach to remote inspections in terms of methods applied and documentation requested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85116542021-10-13 The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting Mofid, Sarah Bolislis, Winona Rei Brading, Clive Hamilton, Nigel Hardit, Cyril Nagaoka, Makoto Parain, Julien Zanta, Maria Kühler, Thomas C. Clin Ther COVID Original Research PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management and operation of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry around the world. It has prompted regulatory authorities to consider new ways of working and introduced, among others, remote inspections to validate the integrity of the regulatory data submitted by companies, to evaluate the quality of production and manufacturing sites, and to ensure the conformity with Good Regulatory Practices with the overall goal of guaranteeing patient safety during the crisis. METHOD: This article summarizes and discusses remote inspection guidelines and other related information made available by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (Japan), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (United Kingdom), and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We also analyze the effect of the pandemic on inspections conducted by the inspectorates of the EMA and the FDA. FINDINGS: The regulatory authorities that we studied all recognized the importance of implementing regulatory policies on remote inspections in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The remote inspection guidelines from the 5 selected regulatory authorities aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic but, while providing valuable advice to the pharmaceutical companies and being similar in intent, were not always aligned in terms of approach and solutions. IMPLICATIONS: On-site inspections are likely to continue to be the norm and the preferred standard for the foreseeable future. However, health authorities will need to further adopt a risk-based inspection approach and stimulate the increased uptake of inspection reliance as proposed by the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme not to overwhelm the pharmaceutical companies with repeat and redundant inspections. Remote inspections have proven to be a new inspection tool, but health authorities should align on their approach to remote inspections in terms of methods applied and documentation requested. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-12 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8511654/ /pubmed/34740466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle COVID Original Research
Mofid, Sarah
Bolislis, Winona Rei
Brading, Clive
Hamilton, Nigel
Hardit, Cyril
Nagaoka, Makoto
Parain, Julien
Zanta, Maria
Kühler, Thomas C.
The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title_full The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title_fullStr The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title_short The Utility of Remote Inspections During the COVID-19 Health Emergency and in the Postpandemic Setting
title_sort utility of remote inspections during the covid-19 health emergency and in the postpandemic setting
topic COVID Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.003
work_keys_str_mv AT mofidsarah theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT bolisliswinonarei theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT bradingclive theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT hamiltonnigel theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT harditcyril theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT nagaokamakoto theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT parainjulien theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT zantamaria theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT kuhlerthomasc theutilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT mofidsarah utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT bolisliswinonarei utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT bradingclive utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT hamiltonnigel utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT harditcyril utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT nagaokamakoto utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT parainjulien utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT zantamaria utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting
AT kuhlerthomasc utilityofremoteinspectionsduringthecovid19healthemergencyandinthepostpandemicsetting