Cargando…

A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care

BACKGROUND: Women with gynecologic malignancies experience improved clinical outcomes when they are treated by gynecologic oncologists and in high-volume cancer centers. However, geography is a major barrier to high-volume care for patients. This qualitative study was undertaken to identify facilita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mujumdar, Vaidehi, Butler, Timberly R., Shalowitz, David I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100868
_version_ 1784582848066355200
author Mujumdar, Vaidehi
Butler, Timberly R.
Shalowitz, David I.
author_facet Mujumdar, Vaidehi
Butler, Timberly R.
Shalowitz, David I.
author_sort Mujumdar, Vaidehi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with gynecologic malignancies experience improved clinical outcomes when they are treated by gynecologic oncologists and in high-volume cancer centers. However, geography is a major barrier to high-volume care for patients. This qualitative study was undertaken to identify facilitators and barriers to patients traveling long distances for gynecologic cancer care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 women with gynecologic malignancies traveling >50 miles for treatment at Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center. Eight interviews included caregivers. Four interview domains focused on personal challenges and coping strategies related to accessing cancer care. RESULTS: Mean distance traveled for care was 87 miles (range: 54–218). Most participants reported that recommendations from physicians, friends, and family motivated travel. 10/19 participants were aware of closer sites for cancer care; 5 had unfavorable experiences elsewhere. Barriers to travel included time, cost, childcare, difficulty navigating, and physical discomfort. Social support was an important facilitator of travel for care; some patients utilized loaned money or vehicles. Participants reported significant energy expenditure scheduling travel, coordinating time off work, and arranging overnight stays near the cancer center. Suggestions for care improvement included travel vouchers, transportation assistance, signage and personnel to help with navigation, and appointments later in the day. Participants supported in-person oncologist outreach to rural areas and appointments via telemedicine; few preferred the current infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Patients who travel long distances for gynecologic cancer care encounter significant burdens and rely heavily on social and financial support. Interventions should be developed and evaluated to reduce the burden of long-distance travel and develop efficient methods of outreach, including telemedicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85118362021-10-21 A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care Mujumdar, Vaidehi Butler, Timberly R. Shalowitz, David I. Gynecol Oncol Rep Research Report BACKGROUND: Women with gynecologic malignancies experience improved clinical outcomes when they are treated by gynecologic oncologists and in high-volume cancer centers. However, geography is a major barrier to high-volume care for patients. This qualitative study was undertaken to identify facilitators and barriers to patients traveling long distances for gynecologic cancer care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 women with gynecologic malignancies traveling >50 miles for treatment at Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center. Eight interviews included caregivers. Four interview domains focused on personal challenges and coping strategies related to accessing cancer care. RESULTS: Mean distance traveled for care was 87 miles (range: 54–218). Most participants reported that recommendations from physicians, friends, and family motivated travel. 10/19 participants were aware of closer sites for cancer care; 5 had unfavorable experiences elsewhere. Barriers to travel included time, cost, childcare, difficulty navigating, and physical discomfort. Social support was an important facilitator of travel for care; some patients utilized loaned money or vehicles. Participants reported significant energy expenditure scheduling travel, coordinating time off work, and arranging overnight stays near the cancer center. Suggestions for care improvement included travel vouchers, transportation assistance, signage and personnel to help with navigation, and appointments later in the day. Participants supported in-person oncologist outreach to rural areas and appointments via telemedicine; few preferred the current infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Patients who travel long distances for gynecologic cancer care encounter significant burdens and rely heavily on social and financial support. Interventions should be developed and evaluated to reduce the burden of long-distance travel and develop efficient methods of outreach, including telemedicine. Elsevier 2021-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8511836/ /pubmed/34692967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100868 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Report
Mujumdar, Vaidehi
Butler, Timberly R.
Shalowitz, David I.
A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title_full A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title_fullStr A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title_short A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
title_sort qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34692967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100868
work_keys_str_mv AT mujumdarvaidehi aqualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare
AT butlertimberlyr aqualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare
AT shalowitzdavidi aqualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare
AT mujumdarvaidehi qualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare
AT butlertimberlyr qualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare
AT shalowitzdavidi qualitativestudyontheimpactoflongdistancetravelforgynecologiccancercare