Cargando…
Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through sno...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002 |
_version_ | 1784582856778973184 |
---|---|
author | Peres, David Monteiro, Jorge Boléo-Tomé, José |
author_facet | Peres, David Monteiro, Jorge Boléo-Tomé, José |
author_sort | Peres, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through snowball convenience sample, collected by email/ social media to health care organizations. Participants answered an online anonymous survey in March 2021. RESULTS: Mean age of 3052 respondents was 42.1 years old, 83.6% were female and 77.8% provided direct health care to COVID-19 patients. Mean time of use per shift was 6-8 hours in 40.8% of the participants. 28.0% reported never changing it during their shift. Resp use (vs Mask) was more associated with discomfort (58.2% vs 26.8%), affecting task performance (41.5 vs 18.9%) and communication (55.0 vs 40.9%), dyspnea (36.0 vs 14.4%), skin rash (37.5 vs 19.4%) and headache (37.5 vs 19.4%). Frequent user errors included touching the front while in use (70.1% Mask vs 66.3% Resp) and omitting hand hygiene before (61.8% Mask vs 55.0% Resp) or after use (61.3% Mask vs 57.0% Resp). Average number of errors was higher for Mask (4.3), than for Resp (3.2) (all: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most HCP admitted an extended use of Mask/ Resp. Resp were more prone to adverse effects and Mask more prone to errors. Strategies to reinforce good practices should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8511873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85118732021-10-13 Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Peres, David Monteiro, Jorge Boléo-Tomé, José Am J Infect Control Major Article BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through snowball convenience sample, collected by email/ social media to health care organizations. Participants answered an online anonymous survey in March 2021. RESULTS: Mean age of 3052 respondents was 42.1 years old, 83.6% were female and 77.8% provided direct health care to COVID-19 patients. Mean time of use per shift was 6-8 hours in 40.8% of the participants. 28.0% reported never changing it during their shift. Resp use (vs Mask) was more associated with discomfort (58.2% vs 26.8%), affecting task performance (41.5 vs 18.9%) and communication (55.0 vs 40.9%), dyspnea (36.0 vs 14.4%), skin rash (37.5 vs 19.4%) and headache (37.5 vs 19.4%). Frequent user errors included touching the front while in use (70.1% Mask vs 66.3% Resp) and omitting hand hygiene before (61.8% Mask vs 55.0% Resp) or after use (61.3% Mask vs 57.0% Resp). Average number of errors was higher for Mask (4.3), than for Resp (3.2) (all: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most HCP admitted an extended use of Mask/ Resp. Resp were more prone to adverse effects and Mask more prone to errors. Strategies to reinforce good practices should be considered. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8511873/ /pubmed/34653529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002 Text en © 2021 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Major Article Peres, David Monteiro, Jorge Boléo-Tomé, José Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title | Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among portuguese health care professionals during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peresdavid medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT monteirojorge medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT boleotomejose medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy |