Cargando…

Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through sno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peres, David, Monteiro, Jorge, Boléo-Tomé, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002
_version_ 1784582856778973184
author Peres, David
Monteiro, Jorge
Boléo-Tomé, José
author_facet Peres, David
Monteiro, Jorge
Boléo-Tomé, José
author_sort Peres, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through snowball convenience sample, collected by email/ social media to health care organizations. Participants answered an online anonymous survey in March 2021. RESULTS: Mean age of 3052 respondents was 42.1 years old, 83.6% were female and 77.8% provided direct health care to COVID-19 patients. Mean time of use per shift was 6-8 hours in 40.8% of the participants. 28.0% reported never changing it during their shift. Resp use (vs Mask) was more associated with discomfort (58.2% vs 26.8%), affecting task performance (41.5 vs 18.9%) and communication (55.0 vs 40.9%), dyspnea (36.0 vs 14.4%), skin rash (37.5 vs 19.4%) and headache (37.5 vs 19.4%). Frequent user errors included touching the front while in use (70.1% Mask vs 66.3% Resp) and omitting hand hygiene before (61.8% Mask vs 55.0% Resp) or after use (61.3% Mask vs 57.0% Resp). Average number of errors was higher for Mask (4.3), than for Resp (3.2) (all: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most HCP admitted an extended use of Mask/ Resp. Resp were more prone to adverse effects and Mask more prone to errors. Strategies to reinforce good practices should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85118732021-10-13 Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Peres, David Monteiro, Jorge Boléo-Tomé, José Am J Infect Control Major Article BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of surgical masks (Mask) and respirators (Resp) was experienced worldwide. We aimed to assess its pattern of use, adverse effects and user errors by Portuguese health care professionals (HCP). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through snowball convenience sample, collected by email/ social media to health care organizations. Participants answered an online anonymous survey in March 2021. RESULTS: Mean age of 3052 respondents was 42.1 years old, 83.6% were female and 77.8% provided direct health care to COVID-19 patients. Mean time of use per shift was 6-8 hours in 40.8% of the participants. 28.0% reported never changing it during their shift. Resp use (vs Mask) was more associated with discomfort (58.2% vs 26.8%), affecting task performance (41.5 vs 18.9%) and communication (55.0 vs 40.9%), dyspnea (36.0 vs 14.4%), skin rash (37.5 vs 19.4%) and headache (37.5 vs 19.4%). Frequent user errors included touching the front while in use (70.1% Mask vs 66.3% Resp) and omitting hand hygiene before (61.8% Mask vs 55.0% Resp) or after use (61.3% Mask vs 57.0% Resp). Average number of errors was higher for Mask (4.3), than for Resp (3.2) (all: P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most HCP admitted an extended use of Mask/ Resp. Resp were more prone to adverse effects and Mask more prone to errors. Strategies to reinforce good practices should be considered. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8511873/ /pubmed/34653529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002 Text en © 2021 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Major Article
Peres, David
Monteiro, Jorge
Boléo-Tomé, José
Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title_full Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title_short Medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among Portuguese health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
title_sort medical masks’ and respirators’ pattern of use, adverse effects and errors among portuguese health care professionals during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34653529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.002
work_keys_str_mv AT peresdavid medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy
AT monteirojorge medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy
AT boleotomejose medicalmasksandrespiratorspatternofuseadverseeffectsanderrorsamongportuguesehealthcareprofessionalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy