Cargando…

Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of point-of-care COVID-19 testing for identifying infected patients in an otolaryngology practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 947 patients tested with a point-of-care nucleic acid amplification test for SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott ID Now). SETTING: Tertiary otola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganesh, Meera, Brawley, Craig Cameron, Khanwalkar, Ashoke, Mycanka, John, Conley, David B., Kern, Robert C., Tan, Bruce K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211049328
_version_ 1784582870364323840
author Ganesh, Meera
Brawley, Craig Cameron
Khanwalkar, Ashoke
Mycanka, John
Conley, David B.
Kern, Robert C.
Tan, Bruce K.
author_facet Ganesh, Meera
Brawley, Craig Cameron
Khanwalkar, Ashoke
Mycanka, John
Conley, David B.
Kern, Robert C.
Tan, Bruce K.
author_sort Ganesh, Meera
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of point-of-care COVID-19 testing for identifying infected patients in an otolaryngology practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 947 patients tested with a point-of-care nucleic acid amplification test for SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott ID Now). SETTING: Tertiary otolaryngology clinic setting from July to November 2020. METHODS: Tests were characterized by provider-specified indication (symptomatic, preprocedural, and universal), subspecialty, provider type, and contemporaneous regional COVID-19 positivity rate, defined as 12%. Positive results were further classified as true or false positive (TP or FP) based on repeat polymerase chain reaction testing wherever available, and true positivity rates were compared among groups by multiway chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. FP rates within 48 hours of a TP result were also evaluated to assess for batch contamination. RESULTS: A total of 947 SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests were performed, yielding 9 TPs (0.95%) and 5 FPs (0.53%). TP rates were significantly different by testing indication, with higher rates among symptomatic patients (P = .012; vs universal, odds ratio = 7.86 [95% CI, 1.27-83.52]; vs preprocedural, odds ratio = 4.91 [95% CI, 0.79-52.17]); by subspecialty (P = .011), as driven by higher positivity rates in laryngology; and by encounter, with higher rates among advanced practice practitioners than physicians (P = .002; odds ratio = 9.97 [95% CI, 2.11-51.16]). TP rates were not significantly different during periods of uncontrolled local outbreak (P = .660). FP rates were not significantly higher within a 48-hour window of a TP (P = .192). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification tests in an outpatient otolaryngology clinic identified a low TP rate (<1%) with most cases being clinically suspected. Laryngology and advanced practice practitioner encounters may have higher positivity rates. Level of evidence: 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85119312021-10-14 Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic Ganesh, Meera Brawley, Craig Cameron Khanwalkar, Ashoke Mycanka, John Conley, David B. Kern, Robert C. Tan, Bruce K. OTO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of point-of-care COVID-19 testing for identifying infected patients in an otolaryngology practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 947 patients tested with a point-of-care nucleic acid amplification test for SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott ID Now). SETTING: Tertiary otolaryngology clinic setting from July to November 2020. METHODS: Tests were characterized by provider-specified indication (symptomatic, preprocedural, and universal), subspecialty, provider type, and contemporaneous regional COVID-19 positivity rate, defined as 12%. Positive results were further classified as true or false positive (TP or FP) based on repeat polymerase chain reaction testing wherever available, and true positivity rates were compared among groups by multiway chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. FP rates within 48 hours of a TP result were also evaluated to assess for batch contamination. RESULTS: A total of 947 SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests were performed, yielding 9 TPs (0.95%) and 5 FPs (0.53%). TP rates were significantly different by testing indication, with higher rates among symptomatic patients (P = .012; vs universal, odds ratio = 7.86 [95% CI, 1.27-83.52]; vs preprocedural, odds ratio = 4.91 [95% CI, 0.79-52.17]); by subspecialty (P = .011), as driven by higher positivity rates in laryngology; and by encounter, with higher rates among advanced practice practitioners than physicians (P = .002; odds ratio = 9.97 [95% CI, 2.11-51.16]). TP rates were not significantly different during periods of uncontrolled local outbreak (P = .660). FP rates were not significantly higher within a 48-hour window of a TP (P = .192). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification tests in an outpatient otolaryngology clinic identified a low TP rate (<1%) with most cases being clinically suspected. Laryngology and advanced practice practitioner encounters may have higher positivity rates. Level of evidence: 3. SAGE Publications 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8511931/ /pubmed/34661041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211049328 Text en © The Authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ganesh, Meera
Brawley, Craig Cameron
Khanwalkar, Ashoke
Mycanka, John
Conley, David B.
Kern, Robert C.
Tan, Bruce K.
Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title_full Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title_fullStr Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title_short Utility of Point-of-Care COVID-19 Testing in an Outpatient Otolaryngology clinic
title_sort utility of point-of-care covid-19 testing in an outpatient otolaryngology clinic
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34661041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473974X211049328
work_keys_str_mv AT ganeshmeera utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT brawleycraigcameron utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT khanwalkarashoke utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT mycankajohn utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT conleydavidb utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT kernrobertc utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic
AT tanbrucek utilityofpointofcarecovid19testinginanoutpatientotolaryngologyclinic