Cargando…

Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles

Electrospun nanofibres can outperform their melt-blown counterparts in many applications, especially air filtration. The different filtration mechanisms of nanofibres are particularly important when it comes to the air filtration of viruses (such as COVID-19) and bacteria. In this work, we present a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabulut, Fabrice N. H., Höfler, Günther, Ashok Chand, Naveen, Beckermann, Gareth W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193257
_version_ 1784582881333477376
author Karabulut, Fabrice N. H.
Höfler, Günther
Ashok Chand, Naveen
Beckermann, Gareth W.
author_facet Karabulut, Fabrice N. H.
Höfler, Günther
Ashok Chand, Naveen
Beckermann, Gareth W.
author_sort Karabulut, Fabrice N. H.
collection PubMed
description Electrospun nanofibres can outperform their melt-blown counterparts in many applications, especially air filtration. The different filtration mechanisms of nanofibres are particularly important when it comes to the air filtration of viruses (such as COVID-19) and bacteria. In this work, we present an electrospun nanofibre filter media, FilterLayr(TM) by NanoLayr Ltd., containing poly(methyl methacrylate)/ethylene vinyl alcohol nanofibres. The outstanding uniformity of the nanofibres was indicated by the good correlation between pressure drop (ΔP) and areal weight with R2 values in the range of 0.82 to 0.98 across various test air velocities. By adjusting the nanofibre areal weight (basis weight), the nanofibre filter media was shown to meet the particle filtration efficiency and breathability requirements of the following internationally accepted facemask and respirator standards: N95 respirator facemask performance in accordance with NIOSH 42CFR84 (filtration efficiency of up to 98.10% at a pressure drop of 226 Pa and 290 Pa at 85 L·min(−1) and 120 L·min(−1), respectively), Level 2 surgical facemask performance in accordance with ASTM F2299 (filtration efficiency of up to 99.97% at 100 nm particle size and a pressure drop of 44 Pa at 8 L·min(−1)), and Level 2 filtration efficiency and Level 1 breathability for barrier face coverings in accordance with ASTM F3502 (filtration efficiency of up to 99.68% and a pressure drop of 133 Pa at 60 L·min(−1)), with Level 2 breathability being achievable at lower nanofibre areal weights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8511993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85119932021-10-14 Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles Karabulut, Fabrice N. H. Höfler, Günther Ashok Chand, Naveen Beckermann, Gareth W. Polymers (Basel) Article Electrospun nanofibres can outperform their melt-blown counterparts in many applications, especially air filtration. The different filtration mechanisms of nanofibres are particularly important when it comes to the air filtration of viruses (such as COVID-19) and bacteria. In this work, we present an electrospun nanofibre filter media, FilterLayr(TM) by NanoLayr Ltd., containing poly(methyl methacrylate)/ethylene vinyl alcohol nanofibres. The outstanding uniformity of the nanofibres was indicated by the good correlation between pressure drop (ΔP) and areal weight with R2 values in the range of 0.82 to 0.98 across various test air velocities. By adjusting the nanofibre areal weight (basis weight), the nanofibre filter media was shown to meet the particle filtration efficiency and breathability requirements of the following internationally accepted facemask and respirator standards: N95 respirator facemask performance in accordance with NIOSH 42CFR84 (filtration efficiency of up to 98.10% at a pressure drop of 226 Pa and 290 Pa at 85 L·min(−1) and 120 L·min(−1), respectively), Level 2 surgical facemask performance in accordance with ASTM F2299 (filtration efficiency of up to 99.97% at 100 nm particle size and a pressure drop of 44 Pa at 8 L·min(−1)), and Level 2 filtration efficiency and Level 1 breathability for barrier face coverings in accordance with ASTM F3502 (filtration efficiency of up to 99.68% and a pressure drop of 133 Pa at 60 L·min(−1)), with Level 2 breathability being achievable at lower nanofibre areal weights. MDPI 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8511993/ /pubmed/34641073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193257 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Karabulut, Fabrice N. H.
Höfler, Günther
Ashok Chand, Naveen
Beckermann, Gareth W.
Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title_full Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title_fullStr Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title_full_unstemmed Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title_short Electrospun Nanofibre Filtration Media to Protect against Biological or Nonbiological Airborne Particles
title_sort electrospun nanofibre filtration media to protect against biological or nonbiological airborne particles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193257
work_keys_str_mv AT karabulutfabricenh electrospunnanofibrefiltrationmediatoprotectagainstbiologicalornonbiologicalairborneparticles
AT hoflergunther electrospunnanofibrefiltrationmediatoprotectagainstbiologicalornonbiologicalairborneparticles
AT ashokchandnaveen electrospunnanofibrefiltrationmediatoprotectagainstbiologicalornonbiologicalairborneparticles
AT beckermanngarethw electrospunnanofibrefiltrationmediatoprotectagainstbiologicalornonbiologicalairborneparticles