Cargando…

Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †

Individual products and models on the market must be specifically differentiated from the rest to meet user demand. In terms of consumer purchasing behaviour, consumers increasingly base their decisions on subjective terms or the impression that the product leaves on them, both in terms of functiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López, Óscar, Murillo, Clara, González, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196532
_version_ 1784582999742873600
author López, Óscar
Murillo, Clara
González, Alfonso
author_facet López, Óscar
Murillo, Clara
González, Alfonso
author_sort López, Óscar
collection PubMed
description Individual products and models on the market must be specifically differentiated from the rest to meet user demand. In terms of consumer purchasing behaviour, consumers increasingly base their decisions on subjective terms or the impression that the product leaves on them, both in terms of functionality, usability, safety, and price adequacy, and regarding the emotions and feelings that it triggers in them. This demand has lead both Asia and Europe to implement new methodologies to develop new products, such as “emotional design” or Kansei engineering. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on the most relevant methodologies based on Kansei engineering and their relevant results in the specific discipline of product design, addressing these five questions: (RQ1) How many studies on KE and emotional design are there in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases from 1995 to February 2021? (RQ2) Which research topics and types of KE are addressed? (RQ3) Who is leading the research on KE and emotional design? (RQ4) What are the benefits and drawbacks of using and applying the methodology? (RQ5) What are the limitations of the current research? We analysed 87 studies focusing on the Kansei methodology used for product design and device technologies (e.g., shape design, actuators, sensors, structure) and aesthetic aspects (e.g., Kansei words selection, the quantification of measured emotions of results, and detected shortcomings), and provided the database with all the collected information. One identified and highlighted sector in the results is the electronic–technological-device sector. Results confirm that this type of methodology has a majority and direct application in these sectors, and they are widely represented in the automotive and electronics industries. Lastly, this SLR provides researchers with a guide for comparative emotional-design work, and facilitates future designers who want to implement emotional design in their work by selecting the specific type according to the results of the SLR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8512474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85124742021-10-14 Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 † López, Óscar Murillo, Clara González, Alfonso Sensors (Basel) Article Individual products and models on the market must be specifically differentiated from the rest to meet user demand. In terms of consumer purchasing behaviour, consumers increasingly base their decisions on subjective terms or the impression that the product leaves on them, both in terms of functionality, usability, safety, and price adequacy, and regarding the emotions and feelings that it triggers in them. This demand has lead both Asia and Europe to implement new methodologies to develop new products, such as “emotional design” or Kansei engineering. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on the most relevant methodologies based on Kansei engineering and their relevant results in the specific discipline of product design, addressing these five questions: (RQ1) How many studies on KE and emotional design are there in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases from 1995 to February 2021? (RQ2) Which research topics and types of KE are addressed? (RQ3) Who is leading the research on KE and emotional design? (RQ4) What are the benefits and drawbacks of using and applying the methodology? (RQ5) What are the limitations of the current research? We analysed 87 studies focusing on the Kansei methodology used for product design and device technologies (e.g., shape design, actuators, sensors, structure) and aesthetic aspects (e.g., Kansei words selection, the quantification of measured emotions of results, and detected shortcomings), and provided the database with all the collected information. One identified and highlighted sector in the results is the electronic–technological-device sector. Results confirm that this type of methodology has a majority and direct application in these sectors, and they are widely represented in the automotive and electronics industries. Lastly, this SLR provides researchers with a guide for comparative emotional-design work, and facilitates future designers who want to implement emotional design in their work by selecting the specific type according to the results of the SLR. MDPI 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8512474/ /pubmed/34640851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196532 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
López, Óscar
Murillo, Clara
González, Alfonso
Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title_full Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title_fullStr Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title_short Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020 †
title_sort systematic literature reviews in kansei engineering for product design—a comparative study from 1995 to 2020 †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196532
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezoscar systematicliteraturereviewsinkanseiengineeringforproductdesignacomparativestudyfrom1995to2020
AT murilloclara systematicliteraturereviewsinkanseiengineeringforproductdesignacomparativestudyfrom1995to2020
AT gonzalezalfonso systematicliteraturereviewsinkanseiengineeringforproductdesignacomparativestudyfrom1995to2020