Cargando…

Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates surgical outcome and safety results of conventional (OT) versus endoscopic transaxillary gasless thyroidectomies (ET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. The weighted mean differences or the odd ratios with corr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasaitis, Kristijonas, Midlenko, Anna, Bekenova, Aigerim, Ignatavicius, Povilas, Gulbinas, Antanas, Dauksa, Albertas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34691299
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.105722
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates surgical outcome and safety results of conventional (OT) versus endoscopic transaxillary gasless thyroidectomies (ET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. The weighted mean differences or the odd ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were examined for surgical outcomes and complications. The results were analysed using fixed- or random-effects models. The heterogeneity was checked by the Cochran Q test and the extent of inconsistency was evaluated by the I(2) statistic. RESULTS: Ten studies and 1597 patients were included. All studies found that ET required longer operative time. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after ET on day 1 and day 7. No statistical difference was found in complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: ET has disadvantages such as longer surgery time, but it is a feasible and safe procedure with lower postoperative pain and comparable complication rates to OT. However, good quality prospective randomised studies are necessary to draw firmer conclusions.