Cargando…

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a comprehensive meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Radiofrequency ablation is a relatively novel treatment that may improve the treatment of HCC. AIM: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhijun, Yu, Qiong, Lu, Xiaozheng, Liu, Yahui, Ji, Bai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34691297
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.105377
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. Radiofrequency ablation is a relatively novel treatment that may improve the treatment of HCC. AIM: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the treatment of HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched for relevant published studies in English (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE) and in Chinese (CBM, CNKI and Wanfang) from their inception until September 23, 2019. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A total of 19 retrospective studies including 2038 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that LLR was superior to RFA in terms of 3-year overall survival rate (OR = 0.62), 1 to 3-year disease-free survival rates (OR = 0.57; OR = 0.41, respectively) and local recurrence rates (OR = 2.71). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis demonstrates that laparoscopic liver resection should be preferred in tumors of size 3–5 cm, while for < 3 cm the long term results are equal.